'Straight' vs. tapered back panel

Discuss all of the intricacies of the jacket in full detail

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg

Post Reply
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

'Straight' vs. tapered back panel

Post by ob1al »

I just noticed this picture from MN Jones's roadtrip thread (hope you don't mind me using the pic MN! ) :

<img src=http://www.minnesotajones.com/EC-17.jpg>

Compared to:

<img src=http://www.indygear.com/gear/images/Fs_vs_Wested1.jpg>

(FS left, Wested right)

The back panel looks very tapered on the original jacket - much more so than current jackets pictured. The shape looks more \/ than [ ].

The bottom of the back panel looks to be MUCH narrower than the top, probably providing a much snugger fit.

Is this just an illusion created by the display in the picture?
User avatar
Marc
Vendor
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2002 2:29 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Marc »

Is this just an illusion created by the display in the picture?
No, you're right. The FS Expo has a tapered back panel, while on Westeds the back panel is square, unless requested to be different (which is why I just love Wested: there's almost nothing you can't change, and it won't cost you several hundred bucks).

Regards,

Marc
Gobler
Vendor
Posts: 644
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 11:53 pm
Location: Peoples Republic of Kalifornia, West of Covina
Contact:

Post by Gobler »

I too like the tapered look but did the Raiders jacket have it as well? Or is this jacket a Raiders? (thought it was LC)

Cheers,
Jeff
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

It's a LC jacket. I think. :-k
User avatar
Flash Gordon
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:38 pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Flash Gordon »

On the right action pleat on the original jacket, it almost looks like there's a seam running parallel to the edge about an inch or so in. Is THAT why the action pleats don't wave and buckle on the original as much?
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

Good eyes, Flash.

You can make it out on the left side top as well.

It looks to be an inch in from the edge of the pleat. The distressing of the jacket has done us a favour here and clearly shown the depth of the pleat.

This suggests to me that the LC jacket had action pleats no deeper than 1", and a very tapered back panel going down to a narrow waist. We already know the jackets were made from very stiff, thick lambskin. Together, these factors would explain the lack of movement in the action pleats in LC.
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

Here are a few stills to reinforce this theory, from theraider.net:

<img src=http://www.theraider.net/films/crusade/ ... ns/c13.jpg>

<img src=http://www.theraider.net/films/crusade/ ... ns/c69.jpg>

<img src=http://www.theraider.net/films/crusade/ ... ns/c60.jpg>

Very little action pleat...erm...action :wink: at all in the above shots.

It makes sense to me that. as the jackets in LC were made from scratch to a new pattern, the movement of the A.P's might be limited - it must have been a bind for the wardrobe dept. people to keep readjusting them between takes in the other movies.

BTW - I am an action pleat fan, but I now believe the A.P's in LC were very minimal indeed. Perhaps Peter could help us out here when he's next around?
Captain D
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1045
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 1:22 pm
Location: York County, PA

Post by Captain D »

Thank you for your pics....its great to see the BACK of the Last Crusade jacket on display, lol,.....

However, to me this Last Crusade jacket looks smaller than the Last Crusade jacket that is on display at the Smithsonian....and it looks like the back of the Temple of Doom jacket that Chris King wore on MK's web-site at www.regular-guy.com....But, perhaps its just me....

Thank you for posting!
Captain D
Minnesota Jones
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 4136
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 2:41 pm
Location: Messin' with Saquatch...
Contact:

Post by Minnesota Jones »

I can confirm with certainty that the jacket at the Museum of Science and Industry is indeed a LC Jacket - it has the snap buttons on the storm flap, it's distressed as all get out (including tears even) and the right coat pocket appears it's been stretched out a bit (Grail Diary anyone?).

And I don't mind people posting my pictures here, that's what they're for! :)

Here's the two jackets on display (the Chicago jacket is first, and then the Smithsonian one...)

Image Image
Rixter
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 2:27 pm

Post by Rixter »

Geez, you think they could display a brand new jacket for such a prestigious display as in the Museum of Science and Industry. Maybe someone could sneak in there over night and apply some globs of Pecards to it, maybe a moderator familiar with using Pecards. :roll:
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Can't think of a soul, myself.... :roll: 8-[ You have anyone in mind? 8) :wink: Regards. Michaelson
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

Rixter wrote:Geez, you think they could display a brand new jacket for such a prestigious display as in the Museum of Science and Industry. Maybe someone could sneak in there over night and apply some globs of Pecards to it, maybe a moderator familiar with using Pecards. :roll:
As an act of self-sacrifice and philanthropy, I'm prepared to swap my brand new Wested for that old, battered rag they have on show.

I think I'll email them right now with that big-hearted offer. :wink: :wink:
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

Thanks _ - was the jacket which you examined a Raiders or a LC jacket?

My theory is that the jackets for the third film were cut quite differently, as I understand the original patterns had been misplaced at the time. This would account for the increased taper to the back hem, the almost non-existent action pleats (see above) (plus the larger collar and pockets, press-stud fasteners and so on which we know about already).
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Quick, Ma, hand me the shotgun. Looks like _ is crawling into the yard again. :-s :wink: High regards, old friend! Michaelson
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

_ thanks for that very fascinating history lesson. It explains a lot, IMO.

What I would be most interested to learn now are the differences between the patterns reproduced from the Keppler prototype and the final patterns for the LC jackets, which presumably incorporated extra input from Ford and the filmmakers?

Ford was a little older, and certainly must have been ‘measured-up’ over again for LC. What tweaks were made at that time to the Keppler prototype pattern and how, if at all, do these changes reflect in the LC jackets which are available today?
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

Who can say why they put a press-stud on the jacket...
That's an interesting one. If they were trying to recreate the Raiders jacket, the inclusion of the top press stud particularly was such an obvious deviation from the original jacket that it must have been deliberate, and it must have served some purpose.

Running the movie through in my mind, I can't think what that purpose was.... :-k
User avatar
Mr. Das
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 3:43 am
Location: Toronto

Post by Mr. Das »

They probably had a scene in the nazi mansion that was scrapped. The press studs are used to hold the flap in place so it doesn't flap around during a storm. So maybe there was an alternate scene where Indy stayed outdoors a bit more.
Captain D
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1045
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 1:22 pm
Location: York County, PA

Post by Captain D »

The only time in L.C. that Indy had his jacket zipped up, that I can think of, would be escaping from the German zepplin....all the way to where Henry Sr. says, "these people are trying to kill us!" Then Indy says, "I know dad!" I'll have to check on the DVD to see if he has it snapped on the lower button or not.....Also, on the Young Indy episode (The Mystery of the Blues) Indy also has his L.C. jacket zipped up, but I can't remember seeing if he used the lower press-stud or not on it......

Kind Regards,
Captain D
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

After wearing the Indy jacket for as long as I have, I ALWAYS request the studs on my storm flaps, regardless of version. In the wind, they're a God send. I imagine Ford got tired of being beat with his own jacket anytime the wind machine was turned on. :wink: Michaelson
User avatar
Gater
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 10:28 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Contact:

Post by Gater »

Before I got my Wested, I had a 'close enuff' jacket that had press studs, and instead of zippering it up, if I didn't want the bottom hanging open, I could just snap the bottom closed, so it wasn't restrictive in any way, but wasn't hangin out, either. It was quite functional and practical.
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

My (new) Wested goat is a Raiders version, but I included press studs both top and bottom, they are really practical. But this still doesn't really explain the inclusion of the studs on the LC jacket. I bet Peter would know.
User avatar
Ken
Staff Member
Staff Member
Posts: 2366
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 7:24 am
Location: Back from the field
Contact:

Post by Ken »

I was speaking to Peter yesterday and heard the about the James Dean jacket for the first time. Basically they took the james jean jacket, took the top breast pocket off, added A2 pockets and extened the action pleats at the back and that was how the Indy jacket we know and love came into existence. The thing which really impressed me was that this all happened within the space of a week - they saw the jacket, got Peter to make it, took it to Ford to try on, made tweakings and adjustments and then made an initial 10 more for the film all in the space of a week! What a feat!

Ken
User avatar
binkmeisterRick
Stealer of Wallets
Posts: 16926
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Chattering with these old bones

Post by binkmeisterRick »

WOW! Not THAT'S service!!! Maybe as a related "Indy" trip I should go back down to James Dean's hometown, which is less than an hour south of me!
User avatar
Magnum
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2002 9:11 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

Post by Magnum »

Flash Gordon,

You make a very interesting observation. It looks almost as though the back panel on the Wested in Chicago was taken in on either side, approximately 1 inch from the end of the action pleat. By taken in I mean as anyone would have done to a shirt that blouses out too much in the back and provides a more fitted look and feel.

So could this be the answer to the tapered look we all seek? Just have your Wested's taken in to provide that V look. Thoughts anyone?
schwammy
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Burbank, California

Post by schwammy »

_ wrote:remember EVERYTHING in the late 1980's had big collars!
Actually, I remember it being the opposite. Big collars were popular in the late 70s, but by the late 80s, wasn't the trend more toward skinny 'Blues Brothers' ties, suits with narrow lapels, and polo shirts with tiny collars? My suit from high school had such tiny lapels, it looked like one of those sack suits from the fifties.

An irrelevant point, I realize; I just wonder if I am remembering it wrong.
User avatar
binkmeisterRick
Stealer of Wallets
Posts: 16926
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Chattering with these old bones

Post by binkmeisterRick »

By the time the 80's really rolled around, there was a throwback to design inspired by the 1950's. Just look at Pee Wee's Playhouse. (Indiana Jones and the Playhouse of Doom? :lol: ) It seems as though things go retro for whatever was 20 to 30 year prior, which explains the resurgence in 60's, 70's, and now 80's fashion.
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Actually, it was a mix of both decades. Example? Look at the trousers. Definitely WW2 officer pinks in design, but the belt loops were for the then popular wide leather belt! I remember them well. :roll: Regards. Michaelson
FLATHEAD
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 723
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 7:18 am
Location: Central New Jersey

Post by FLATHEAD »

Speaking of the 80's, just remember, nothing comes between Brooke
and her Jordaches...

I fell in love with the way those pants fit... every curve...... of.....Oh baby...

Flathead
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Easy there, big fellow....take a deep breath.... :shock: :wink: Regards. Michaelson
User avatar
IndyBlues
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1523
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Inside a really nice jacket.
Contact:

Post by IndyBlues »

Strange, my Wested DOES have a tapered back panel. After all this discussion, I just assumed mine was square. Well, I took a tape measure to it, and sure enough, it's pretty tapered.
I get 21" up top, 17 1/2" at the bottom.

Anyone else check theirs?
User avatar
Bufflehead Jones
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3191
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Bufflehead Jones »

IndyBlues,

It fit that cut bod of yours so well, you never noticed how tapered it was. Mine is tapered, too. The taper just runs in the other direction.
User avatar
Bufflehead Jones
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3191
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Bufflehead Jones »

Actually, all joking aside, my Wested Raiders measures 19 3/4" across the top, and 17" across the bottom.
User avatar
IndyBlues
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1523
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Inside a really nice jacket.
Contact:

Post by IndyBlues »

Bufflehead Jones wrote:IndyBlues,

It fit that cut bod of yours so well, you never noticed how tapered it was. Mine is tapered, too. The taper just runs in the other direction.
:lol: I wish that were the case my friend. My JACKET is tapered the right way, infortunately, my BODY is tapered in reverse, too. :P
Indianafred
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 2:21 pm
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

Post by Indianafred »

Is there any pics of the "james dean" jacket, as it looked before the indy transformation?
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

Strange, my Wested DOES have a tapered back panel. After all this discussion, I just assumed mine was square.
I always assumed there was a little taper to the current back panel - my point is the taper on the pictured LC jacket looks much more extreme (plus without action pleats as we know them).

It It looks as though the back panel on the LC jacket was taken in on either side, around 1 inch from the end of the action pleat, for a more 'fitted' look.
Indiana Joe
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 897
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 10:13 pm
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Indiana Joe »

FLATHEAD wrote:Speaking of the 80's, just remember, nothing comes between Brooke
and her Jordaches...

I fell in love with the way those pants fit... every curve...... of.....Oh baby...

Flathead
Flathead, I believe nothing came between Brooke and her Calvins. :wink:
Indiana Ken wrote:I was speaking to Peter yesterday and heard the about the James Dean jacket for the first time. Basically they took the james jean jacket, took the top breast pocket off, added A2 pockets and extened the action pleats at the back and that was how the Indy jacket we know and love came into existence. The thing which really impressed me was that this all happened within the space of a week - they saw the jacket, got Peter to make it, took it to Ford to try on, made tweakings and adjustments and then made an initial 10 more for the film all in the space of a week! What a feat!

Ken
That is a very interesting tidbit. I hadn't heard that before.

I.J.
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

I was speaking to Peter yesterday and heard the about the James Dean jacket for the first time. Basically they took the james jean jacket, took the top breast pocket off, added A2 pockets and extened the action pleats at the back and that was how the Indy jacket we know and love came into existence. The thing which really impressed me was that this all happened within the space of a week - they saw the jacket, got Peter to make it, took it to Ford to try on, made tweakings and adjustments and then made an initial 10 more for the film all in the space of a week! What a feat!

Ken
I hope this can be incorporated into the main site during the revamp - it's a little gem of design information!
ob1al
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:41 am
Location: The Yookay
Contact:

Post by ob1al »

Here's a comparison shot between the Wested and a James Dean Jacket.

<img src=http://uk.msnusers.com/_Secure/0VQCz*64 ... 4133030105>
User avatar
binkmeisterRick
Stealer of Wallets
Posts: 16926
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Chattering with these old bones

Post by binkmeisterRick »

I remember doing a google search for James Dean jackets and ended up with several results... Is there any way of finding out which Dean jacket was used as a model? Was it a movie jacket or a personal jacket of Dean's? At any rate, this is a good comparison pic and the closest match I've seen.
FLATHEAD
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 723
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 7:18 am
Location: Central New Jersey

Post by FLATHEAD »

Flathead, I believe nothing came between Brooke and her Calvins.
That right! My mind never really got past just looking at her. Oh,
by the way, You got the look. No, YOU got the look...

Flathead
Post Reply