Talking to hatters about what would have constituted the "Australian model" fedora, etc.
For years this was a good topic for discussion, when Deborah. N. said it was their Australian model(in reference to the Raiders HJ)
Then, this year, I think it was, we found out from an interview with her, that what she meant was, the only hat in the HJ shop at the time with enough crown and brim to use to make her vision of the Raiders fedora was an Aussie slouch type hat with the wide brim, pinned up on one side. So, using that as the clay, Swales worked on it, cutting the brim down to the specs she wanted and made the prototype for what was to follow. The hat had air vent holes in the crown, and she requested the copies not to have them.
I have always wondered if that first hat she took with her, in her personal luggage to France to begin filming was the prototype, since she said she had only one hat at that point in time. The ribbon would have probably covered the holes up.
What I'm not sure about is whether I've got the degrees of each element correct and in what ratio to each other. ...and how X adjustment will affect Y. But that's where all the fun is, huh? But when you say a tad of taper on the sides, are you talking like 1/8 of an inch or something more noticeable?
Yep, that is where the fun comes in! Because, the point at which the hat starts the taper on the block is important. Just how far up, if any, do you go to start the taper? Or, does the taper start at the very bottom of the block?
Then at what point, measured from the bottom of the block, does the radius start? All of this is important. I suggest trial and error. That's how I did it. And it is a great learning experience, because you learn how small nuances affect the final look of the hat.
On the taper issue, the front and back are not the same as what you see on the sides. On the sides, I have found that anything 1/4 an inch and larger is just too much, because it will not vanish when you put the creases into the hat. So, anything from 1/16ths to 3 1/16ths, per side is what I find works well.
My own studies of the Raiders block have told me some taper is involved, because I can reference my CS blocks and compare by film, the Raiders fedora and the CS fedora. The comparison told me the Raiders block had some taper built into the block, and that it morphs from a regular oval on the bottom to a round oval on the crown. The classic fedora block shape.
The devil is in the details. That is, where you start the taper, and also where the radius starts that forms the tip of the crown.
Then there is the front and back taper, and where this breaks to form the radius that becomes the tip, or top of the crown. I have found that there is taper in the front and back too. It has to be there in order for the regular oval bottom to morph into the round oval tip of the crown. If the block is straight up, on the front and back, you get a true reverse taper, that is NOT what the Raiders fedora had. The reverse taper we see in the SOC hat is caused by bulging felt, and not the blockshape. True reverse taper is not seen in the Raiders fedora. It's a caricature that some of us have put into the block. To mimic the bulge in back. But, it is inaccurate to the film hat. But I have seen some old films that had this true reverse taper on the back of the hat, which means the block used for those hats was straight up, front and back. Fedora