whiskyman wrote:Well, not to name names, but there is a "whip expert" in Germany that has been insinuating that whip makers claiming to be making roohide whips are deceiving their customers by using calf or cow bolsters. Utter rubbish, because as I mentioned roohide is only a preferable leather when it comes to braiding. Using roo for bolsters instead of cow or calf will make absolutely NO difference to the quality of the whip in ANY way!! Just a waste of a more expensive leather!
It only takes a little searching on the internet to disprove that as even a potential practice to deceive anyone. So, that's ridiculous.
Further, I found the guidance from Josh who is making my whip very helpful. I'll paste it here for all to see...
"The [kip] bolsters won't really drive the price down for a few reasons. The parts of the kangaroo skins that get used as bolsters wouldn't really be used for anything else, they come from the very edges and are kind of scrappy and thin and are otherwise scrap. For American bullwhips many people prefer kip because it can help add diameter and can ultimately help with smoothness because it's softer and more supple when it gets conditioned, so it can fill up any creases from the bellies just a little bit better than kangaroo (but that difference is negligible). The bolsters don't really do anything for durability of a whip. So, apart from helping with adding thickness, the decision is really just a piece of mind thing. A lot of people like to be able to say that their whip is 100% kangaroo, or they like to be able to say it's built as close to David Morgan's Indys as possible."
whiskyman wrote:I posted some pics of some of my own whips a few days ago - just to point out I do know what I'm talking about ;-)
Oh, I know. No need to prove yourself to me.
