Every time I look at this hat, Eric, it amazes me. It's also hands-down proof that you can make a SA SoC fedora out of a FedIV. Mind you, I have NO idea how you pull it off, but it can be done!
binkmeisterRick wrote:Every time I look at this hat, Eric, it amazes me. It's also hands-down proof that you can make a SA SoC fedora out of a FedIV. Mind you, I have NO idea how you pull it off, but it can be done!
yes. you are very right. it can be done. the only thing I struggle with is the back of the hat. its good looking by all means. but not really the same as the SOC hat. ah well, who sees that anyway? I dont
Indiana Holt wrote:yes. you are very right. it can be done. the only thing I struggle with is the back of the hat. its good looking by all means. but not really the same as the SOC hat. ah well, who sees that anyway? I dont
Tell you what, I'll steal your hat, put it on my head, and run. That way you'll see the back of your hat!
it sure looks like it now. but in my life there is allways something that comes in between. but from tis point it looks like I will make it next year....
I'm with davidb. I cannot seem to get a deep center dent in a Fed. Kudos to you just for that!
Terrific looking hat. Looks terrific (and very SA). You can see all of the hard work you put in getting it that way (why did the movie people have it so much easier! ).
crismans wrote:I'm with davidb. I cannot seem to get a deep center dent in a Fed. Kudos to you just for that!
Terrific looking hat. Looks terrific (and very SA). You can see all of the hard work you put in getting it that way (why did the movie people have it so much easier! ).
I think because they put the hat through some abuse that not many of us (aside from Jason) would ever do to a hat we've spent good money on and probably really care about.
but, if you want to sit on it, roll it up, squish it 6 ways to sunday...who knows what you might get.
Indiana Holt wrote:it sure looks like it now. but in my life there is allways something that comes in between. but from tis point it looks like I will make it next year....
RaidersBash wrote:I think because they put the hat through some abuse that not many of us (aside from Jason) would ever do to a hat we've spent good money on and probably really care about.
but, if you want to sit on it, roll it up, squish it 6 ways to sunday...who knows what you might get.
Aside from the distressing, you can't really "fix" the Fed's shape, including the back, as Holt said (esp. the 3/4 rear), to make it any more S.A. than when you pull it out of its box (without reblocking it entirely). That when combined with the particular angles of the curves to the top affects the way the whole top of the hat appears. You could get it looking good from one angle, but it would throw out another even worse as the felt has to come from somewhere.
i have it look SA from the fornt, the top and the sides. the only thing that look alittle of is that round mushrom bulge like back of the SOC fedora. I have the back of the hat look more like the temple hat.
Indiana Holt wrote:i have it look SA from the fornt, the top and the sides. the only thing that look alittle of is that round mushrom bulge like back of the SOC fedora. I have the back of the hat look more like the temple hat.
thanx again guys
That is the problem I always had. This was a key spot I focused on when working on a block. Something had to happen on the back of the hat to be able to drop the rear of the center bash to 3-1/2" from the brim, yet not cause the hat to taper. My Federations would always taper when I tried to go that low. Plus there didn't seem to be enough hat left on top to get the "fullness" that the Raiders hat had. When I left the bash higher (i.e. 4") so as not to taper the hat, the hat looked more like the Temple of Doom hat from the back.