What do you guys think? I am under the assumption, that size generally isn't an issue. For the most part, we are ordering jackets in and around the same size. So an inch or two in the shoulders and sleeve, shouldn't disrupt the accuracy of the entire jacket. Only in extreme cases should it matter. For example, if Tony was asked to make a jacket for an infant or a giant... obviously then, he would make adjustments to the jacket's details (ie. pockets, flaps etc...) to look appropriate on that size of jacket.
Here is what others have said so far...
nicktheguy wrote:I think if someone was to define a completely screen accurate jacket, they would have to have the exact specifications of what was used in the film - in this case it would have to be that of the size of Harrison Ford....however (and I am speaking as a stuntman) quite often the stunt double costumes are a size or two larger than the ones worn by the principle performers...why? To allow for pads. I would be willing to bet that the stunt jackets were larger to allow for stunt pads and jerk vests...this would mean that Screen accurate would have to be particualr to a certain scene or action sequence. To be honest, the size alterations on pockets and collars would only be noticeable on extremely large or extremely small jackets.
Any thoughts?TheChimp wrote:It's subjective, but I would say yes, it is screen accurate. If you were to say no, then I don't think anything could be considered SA unless it not only was in HF's size, but had every distressing mark in exactly the same place on the jacket. Even this isn't possible since there were multiple jackets.... so relax. It's SA.
s.