Was Indy's gun an S & M .45 or .44?

Need help finding an Indy Gun, want to discuss film used guns...

Moderator: Cajunkraut

Post Reply
User avatar
'Ohio' Erick
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Ohio

Was Indy's gun an S & M .45 or .44?

Post by 'Ohio' Erick »

I found these two pictures of a Smith & Wesson 44 Hand Ejector - 2nd Model (top) and the Smith & Wesson Commercial Model 1917 .45 ACP (bottom) on the Internet at http://www.juliaauctions.com/firearms/3-03/catalog/. The similarity between the two is unbelievably close. How sure are we that Indy's revolver wasn't actually a .44 Hand Ejector (2nd model)?

Image Image

Warm Regards,

Erick
User avatar
Sergei
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 2047
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 11:44 am
Location: Off the grid, in from the cold - Jack's Canyon ~1119
Contact:

Post by Sergei »

REAL SURE!!! The guns for the trilogy were well documented. They either came from Bapty in London or Syd Stembridge. Our own Lee Keppler actually went to Stembridge and actually fired the Raiders gun. You should check out the gun faq on the main Indygear website:
http://www.indygear.com/faq/gunsfaq.shtml

-Sergei
p.s. Other mods please add anything else I missed.
User avatar
'Ohio' Erick
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Ohio

Post by 'Ohio' Erick »

Sergei,

Sorry! :oops: I must have missed that faqs sheet. Still, the similarity is incredible. Wouldn't you agree?

Has anyone here ever owned or fired one of the .44's?

Warm Regards,

Erick
IndyMac
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 9:12 am
Location: Northern New York

Post by IndyMac »

The 2nd Model Hand Ejector is basically the civilian version of the 1917. The gun is on the same frame and all parts interchange.
The .44 Special is an excellent round, accurate in good guns, soft recoiling in factory loadings, and very versatile if hand loaded. I have a 3rd model Smith in .44 and would't part with it for anything.
User avatar
'Ohio' Erick
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Ohio

Post by 'Ohio' Erick »

IndyMac,

Do you know if the .44 is an easier, less expensive model than the 1917 .45 ACP to get a hold of, about the same, or harder & more expensive?
IndyMac
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 9:12 am
Location: Northern New York

Post by IndyMac »

There were approximately 17,510 2nd Models made and 163,476 1917s, so the 1917 is easier to locate. 2nd Models are generally more expensive but you might find a bargain and also might locate a 2nd with a 4in. barrel which could save a trip to the gunsmith to make it more indyish.
Peacock's Eye
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 10:25 am
Location: Somewhere in Mississippi

Post by Peacock's Eye »

I have seen 2nd Model .44 H.E.'s for as little as $300 and as much as $650 at gun shows, depending on condition. Shooting a .44 Special revolver is similar to shooting a .45 ACP revolver, because the ballistics are similar.
User avatar
Pyroxene
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 1820
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 9:35 am
Location: San Marcos, TX
Contact:

Post by Pyroxene »

I love the picture of the 1917. Those grips are very attractive.
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

They're dead ringers for each other, Eric. Personally I prefer the .44 special round myself. Regards. Michaelson
User avatar
'Ohio' Erick
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Ohio

Post by 'Ohio' Erick »

They really are very handsome pistols. Personally, I can't decide which grips I like better - the ones on the .44 or the ones on the .45. That 1917 is the one I am trying to purchase right now. Someone else is currently reviewing it and if they pass on it then I get it. I'm "holding my breath" & hoping they don't buy it, but I hope they reach a decision soon because my lungs are starting to hurt (y'know, being a smoker & all). :wink:

Warm Regards,

Erick
User avatar
Pyroxene
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 1820
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 9:35 am
Location: San Marcos, TX
Contact:

Post by Pyroxene »

I'll just add that those grips are rare and highly sought after. Good luck on it.
User avatar
'Ohio' Erick
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Ohio

Post by 'Ohio' Erick »

I'll just add that those grips are rare and highly sought after.
Really? Please forgive my ignorance here, but...why?

Warm Regards,

Erick
User avatar
Pyroxene
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 1820
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 9:35 am
Location: San Marcos, TX
Contact:

Post by Pyroxene »

They are missing the S&W medallion from them. You see the Medallion version (Gold & Silver) and the Military version (non-checkered wood) at most of the gun shows and guns for sale.

Very rarely have i seen a checkered grip missing the medallion.
The Smith & Wesson .45 ACP seems to have these grips.
RonC
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 444
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: Paige, Texas

Post by RonC »

Pyro, et al: The "non-medallion" S&W grips are from commercial models of S&W revolvers in the 1920's, I do believe. I have seen them on S&W Commercial model .45s as well as .38's from the same period.
Post Reply