Bags, Boots, Shirts and all other gear should be discussed here.
Moderators: Mike , Cajunkraut , Tennessee Smith
Lukmas
Archaeologist
Posts: 292 Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Uk, England, London
Contact:
Post
by Lukmas » Sat May 24, 2008 7:26 am
Hope the MOD's dont think this is a spoiler. It is not really a big plot twist!
Maybe it is just me. But i am sure Indy's pants were baggy-er in Indy IV than they used to be?
Anymore agree?
Regards
Luke
Lukmas
Archaeologist
Posts: 292 Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Uk, England, London
Contact:
Post
by Lukmas » Sat May 24, 2008 7:32 am
See what i mean.. they dont seem to fit?!
Indiana Strones
Museum Curator
Posts: 1760 Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:48 pm
Location: Roma, Italy
Post
by Indiana Strones » Sat May 24, 2008 7:40 am
I think you can say the same about the jacket.
TheMechanic
Dig Leader
Posts: 597 Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: In a skillet with potatoes & onions
Post
by TheMechanic » Sat May 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Looks like the silver keeper is missing on his gun belt too. And he has is bucked upside down this time. (The buckle facing the other way.)
starks_6
Archaeologist
Posts: 244 Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2002 7:32 am
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post
by starks_6 » Sat May 24, 2008 6:25 pm
I felt watching the movie that they were too big. they looked really long around the crotch area too like they were poorly fitted.... like...dare I say it... OLD MANS PANTS!!!!
den den dennnn
IndyWannaBee
Archaeologist
Posts: 313 Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:45 pm
Post
by IndyWannaBee » Sat May 24, 2008 7:33 pm
At least he didn't have them hiked up above his belly button!!! That would really be Old Man Pants!!!!!