Page 1 of 1

A question about Magnoli pants back pockets

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 5:58 am
by Erri
I just looked at this scene from Raiders
Image
and then i read that old thread posted by Magnoli about taylored pants

i wonder if the back pockets shouldnt be a bit more like i roughly drawed in red in the following pic

Image

I'm starting to go really nut for screen accuracy :lol:
Thanks Magnoli for your answer (when it will be posted).

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:35 am
by Texas Raider
I believe I mentioned something about this in the original thread about his pants as well. They needed to be slightly more scalloped and maybe larger too.


great grabs, erri!

have a nice day.

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:38 am
by Erri
Texas Raider wrote:I believe I mentioned something about this in the original thread about his pants as well. They needed to be slightly more scalloped and maybe larger too.


great grabs, erri!

have a nice day.
Thank you my friend, well i hope these screen grabs might help the great Magnoli.

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:06 am
by VP
ImageImageImageImageImage

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:18 am
by Erri
Thank you the VP, the first one is very clear in supporting my... question

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:00 am
by Michaelson
Just a point here, at least from my observation....all the photos show the back of the trousers where Indy is leaning forward. Wouldn't IM's flaps look exactly the same if the flap is buttoned, then the trousers stressed forward, as is shown in erri's photos? I think they would. The flap will look as sharp. If you make them that way in the flat, then stress them, they'll look almost triangular in shape.

I think it's just the way the flap is being pulled (stressed) that's showing us the shape we're seeing. They don't look that way flat.

How about someone putting on a pair of Indy M's trouser, lean forward at the angles like the photos, then take a look at the flap shape and tell us what you see. (No photos, please. I don't want to look at any ones, uh, posterior photos, thank you very much. Just report back what you observe.)

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:08 am
by VP
Michaelson wrote:(No photos, please. I don't want to look at any ones, uh, posterior photos, thank you very much. Just report back what you observe.)
Afraid of someone seeing you surfing on weird sites during worktime, eh? ;)

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:20 am
by Michaelson
Humm. Hadn't thought of that angle. :-k :lol:

Nah. They've walked in on me reading Egyptian magic on demonical possession and not raised an eyebrow. I guess nothing much surprises them anymore..... :wink:

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:28 am
by Erri
Michaelson wrote:Just a point here, at least from my observation....all the photos show the back of the trousers where Indy is leaning forward. Wouldn't IM's flaps look exactly the same if the flap is buttoned, then the trousers stressed forward, as is shown in erri's photos? I think they would. The flap will look as sharp. If you make them that way in the flat, then stress them, they'll look almost triangular in shape.

I think it's just the way the flap is being pulled (stressed) that's showing us the shape we're seeing. They don't look that way flat.

How about someone putting on a pair of Indy M's trouser, lean forward at the angles like the photos, then take a look at the flap shape and tell us what you see. (No photos, please. I don't want to look at any ones, uh, posterior photos, thank you very much. Just report back what you observe.)

Regards! Michaelson
Well Mike, the first pic i took and elaborated is the scene in front of the swordman in Cairo, in that scene indy is just standing and not bending. :wink:
and as you can see in the first (farest) shot the pants are loose as whenever he stands.

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:31 am
by Michaelson
Sorry erri, I'm seeing him bent forward at the waist in all 5 of your photos above, as well as the first photo in the opening post. :-k

I do see the straighter line of the pocket in your closeup though. I'm still of the belief it's the bend of the flap in the flex over the curve of the backside of an individual we're seeing. I'd love to see side by side comparisons of these two trousers laying flat on a table.

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:40 am
by Erri
The 5 photos i posted in the first message are all the same shot but zoomed many times. He's just bent of few grades, how can a pocket change it's shape for few grades?
Well i'll look for other pics just for the sake of it

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:52 am
by Michaelson
erri_wan wrote: He's just bent of few grades, how can a pocket change it's shape for few gradest
Easily. You're also assuming they're the same pair in every shot too. That's the same mistake we make in our jacket discussions. I've had several pairs of NH trousers pass through my hands, and where they were also custom made, no two pairs had the same shaped flap on the back pockets! :roll: :wink:

Please find and post away any and all photos you can, my friend. I'm not saying I'm right. I'm just stating an opinion of what I'm seeing, and something to take in to consideration, as we've seen a LOT of these 'this is what is going on', and discovering that it's not the case at all.

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:56 am
by Erri
I didn't think that we could have had different pockets in the same kind of pants... well that could explain a lot

So my first question from "how screen accurate they are?" change to "is it possible to have them more scalloped (as Texas said)?"

I'll try to take other pics from other part of the movies... by now get another from Cairo :wink:

Image


Anyway i'm waiting for Magnoli here, this is just a friendly question to a great taylor, i dont want that this tread might turn into a campaign against him. It would be highly nefarious

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 12:02 pm
by Michaelson
You've proved my point by your own photos, erri. Look at your first post and red out line of the flap.....flat sides. Look at your latest screen grabs and red line....curved/scalloped flap.

So, what's screen accurate? Looks like and either/or answer to me. They change from trouser to trouser.

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:24 pm
by Indy Magnoli
All I can say is #-o

But seriously... I'm quite happy with the shape, but if you want a different flap shape, feel free to e-mail me a JPG when you order and I'll try to get them as close as I can to your preference. :D

Kind regards,
Indy

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 4:33 pm
by Erri
Indy Magnoli wrote:All I can say is #-o
:lol:
I'm quite happy with the shape, but if you want a different flap shape, feel free to e-mail me a JPG when you order and I'll try to get them as close as I can to your preference. :D
That's a good news, would it cost something more?

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:59 pm
by Indy Magnoli
erri_wan wrote:That's a good news, would it cost something more?
Nope. ;)

Kind regards,
Indy

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:08 am
by Erri
Great thing to know Magnoli :D:D:D:D I think you should add this info to your thread or well we could link this to yours :wink:

Re: A question about Magnoli pants back pockets

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:32 am
by Indy_Railok
erri_wan wrote: I'm starting to go really nut for screen accuracy :lol:
You no nuts, You're crazy!

:lol: , I couldn't hold myself.

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:34 am
by Erri
That's true, as i said to Michaelson... I blame COW :twisted: :twisted:

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:18 am
by Michaelson
That's true....that's what he told me! 8) :wink:

High regards! Michaelson

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:58 am
by Floribama Steve
I got some severe "grooves/no grooves" deja vu while reading this thread. :lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:36 pm
by Michaelson
I, too, felt a disturbance in the force :shock: ....whoops, wrong forum.. #-o :wink:

Regards! Michaelson.

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:44 pm
by Redinight
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 6593505318

Wow...

Edit, pis disapeared, darn it was so great... Definately sculpted, only slightly.

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:20 am
by Indiana Jerry
Michaelson wrote:I, too, felt a disturbance in the force :shock: ....whoops, wrong forum.. #-o :wink:
Sorry, that was me, typing w/ the blastshield down again... :oops:

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:06 am
by Erri
This kind of pants?

Image Image

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:35 am
by Redinight
erri-wan, no it wasn't those. They were such a great mach and when I looked for Korean stuff, they never showed up. I should email the seller to get the pics, because they look so close, and they had normal belt loops and such..

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 3:38 am
by Erri
Redinight wrote:erri-wan, no it wasn't those. They were such a great mach and when I looked for Korean stuff, they never showed up. I should email the seller to get the pics, because they look so close, and they had normal belt loops and such..
mmh interesting, see if you can get the pics :D

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 4:34 pm
by DocWeeks
VP, just wondering when your wife/gf finds all those pics of Ford's posterior how you're going to explain it... :-P

Wow... I remember when I first found IndyGear several years ago... the screen accuracy detail wasn't NEAR this... detailed.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:43 pm
by Michaelson
I do..... #-o

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:36 am
by VP
I don't need a woman.

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:30 am
by binkmeisterRick
I don't need to drink, either, but it sure makes life nicer. :wink:

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:35 am
by Erri
I think this topic can be locked, nothing more we could say about this.

Magnoli offered free changes to everyone who asks for a different shape of the pockets so in conclusion i link to the pants thread viewtopic.php?t=14894

and this is all :wink: