Page 3 of 3

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:02 pm
by Rundquist
Fedora wrote:
Now, I see more resemblence between our hats and the Raiders fedora than say between the TOD and TLC fedora and the Raiders hat. But maybe that is just me!

Image


In the end, I am able to say that I made the hats for my fav hero. Not Optimo, or Joe Blow hatters. Some may say that we ruined Indy's look. That's their right to do so. I think the hats from us look a heck of alot better than the TOD and TLC hats. But I am predjudiced, and don't mind saying it!! :lol:




But if you prefer this one.........go for it!!! :)

Image
To be honest, although your hat does look more like the Raiders hat at least superficially, it just doesn't move like the Raiders hat. It seemed like a hat better suited for "Oddjob" in Goldfinger. :rolling:

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:04 pm
by Rundquist
DR Ulloa wrote:Just wondering, why would would one of Steve's hats be unfinished? I don't think anyone except Marc spends more time pouncing any one individual hat. Last I heard, ABs were coming with sweatbands and everything!

Dave
A raw edged hat is all I meant. Cheers

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:05 pm
by binkmeisterRick
As I suggested, everyone needs to check their egos at the door and get this thread back on topic.

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:06 pm
by DR Ulloa
Rundquist wrote:
DR Ulloa wrote:Just wondering, why would would one of Steve's hats be unfinished? I don't think anyone except Marc spends more time pouncing any one individual hat. Last I heard, ABs were coming with sweatbands and everything!

Dave
A raw edged hat is all I meant. Cheers
Thanks for clearing that up. Unfinished and raw edge are two completely different things.

Dave

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:08 pm
by Rundquist
binkmeisterRick wrote:As I suggested, everyone needs to check their egos at the door and get this thread back on topic.
We all have egos. Fedora was not above going "mano Y mano" as they say. He's tough. He can take it and so can I. But if you look at this thread, you'll see that I was goaded. I just gave back as good as I got and then some. But we're all cool here. :lol:

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:09 pm
by Indiana Venkman
Rundquist wrote:However, if I wanted a tall Abe Lincoln-ish, hot, cartoonish-looking, unfinished, brown, beaver fedora, yours would be first on my list (or perhaps Keppler's).
See this is where what you are saying starts to turn nasty and you get people jumping on you.

The way you are describing this hat, one that many of the people frequenting this particular forum consider their favorite look, is coming across as an insult. The very things you are criticizing in a somewhat biting way are what some of us LOVE about a good hat. No offense, but although your Optimos are nice looking hats I would never buy one for myself as I am not particular to those styles of hat and they don't suit me. But that is ME, my personal taste. I'm not going to trash the styles you gravitate to in a flippant and insulting manner because I am not fond of the styles. They don't have the 'swing' you mention to my eye. They just look like all the other trendy lids I see EVERYONE wearing now. I want to stand out and to me the 'Indy' sings, swings and jives just fine.

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:10 pm
by Rundquist
DR Ulloa wrote:
Rundquist wrote:
DR Ulloa wrote:Just wondering, why would would one of Steve's hats be unfinished? I don't think anyone except Marc spends more time pouncing any one individual hat. Last I heard, ABs were coming with sweatbands and everything!

Dave
A raw edged hat is all I meant. Cheers
Thanks for clearing that up. Unfinished and raw edge are two completely different things.

Dave
Yeah I meant "unfinished" in the classic sense (not completed), not by hatter jargon. I meant an unfinished fedora by my definition. Cheers

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:15 pm
by binkmeisterRick
That may be true, and you both may be able to take it, but experience has shown that more often than not neither side gives an inch and things continue to escalate and move further off topic. And even if the two of you can take it, others will come in who will start flinging their own mud. (As has already begun to happen.) You and Steve are entitled to your opinions, but it is clear neither one of you is going to budge and that by continuing down this path, the thread will continue to go downhill. This thread has gone far enough off topic and needs to get back on track before it looses the need to remain open.

This is a final warning to everyone.

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:17 pm
by Rundquist
Indiana Venkman wrote:
Rundquist wrote:However, if I wanted a tall Abe Lincoln-ish, hot, cartoonish-looking, unfinished, brown, beaver fedora, yours would be first on my list (or perhaps Keppler's).
See this is where what you are saying starts to turn nasty and you get people jumping on you.

The way you are describing this hat, one that many of the people frequenting this particular forum consider their favorite look, is coming across as an insult. The very things you are criticizing in a somewhat biting way are what some of us LOVE about a good hat. No offense, but although your Optimos are nice looking hats I would never buy one for myself as I am not particular to those styles of hat and they don't suit me. But that is ME, my personal taste. I'm not going to trash the styles you gravitate to in a flippant and insulting manner because I am not fond of the styles. They don't have the 'swing' you mention to my eye. They just look like all the other trendy lids I see EVERYONE wearing now. I want to stand out and to me the 'Indy' sings, swings and jives just fine.

You know Venkman, I really don't care what people think of me. That's the honest truth. I've been here a long time. I've been here longer than most of the current moderators. I don't even care about hats. I don't care about the Indy and I don't care about all of my Optimos or I wouldn't be selling them. But when someone on this board tells somebody else that their opinion is "wrong", it bothers me. I just told all of you that your collective opinions were wrong and you guys didn't like it one bit. Get me? Cheers

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:18 pm
by Rundquist
binkmeisterRick wrote:That may be true, and you both may be able to take it, but experience has shown that more often than not neither side gives an inch and things continue to escalate and move further off topic. And even if the two of you can take it, others will come in who will start flinging their own mud. (As has already begun to happen.) You and Steve are entitled to your opinions, but it is clear neither one of you is going to budge and that by continuing down this path, the thread will continue to go downhill. This thread has gone far enough off topic and needs to get back on track before it looses the need to remain open.

This is a final warning to everyone.
OK

By the way, I'm running for "Grand Poobah" of Indygear. I hope I can count on all of your votes. :Plymouth:



:P

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:17 am
by darthbish
We have so many great offerings nowadays, and the good thing about it is, you can find one that looks very Indyish, while being in your budget.
The great thing about this is that this group here are responsible for most of what we have today. We must support our current sources, and lend our support to all of the vendors.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:48 am
by Fedora
PS- I’m sensing that you are getting a “sour grapes” vibe off of me, otherwise you wouldn’t have posted all that “in the end I was the guy chosen for Indy 4” business. I assure you I could really give a ####. I don’t have any stake in this whatsoever. I haven't bought a fedora in years.

PPS- I'm thinking about sending you a Montecristie for a reblock. Also I might send you a felt hat for a welted edge. Do you think you can help me out? "Master Hatter" doesn't mean much these days anyway, right

Sour grapes? Actually, I am not, although I can see how you might think so. But to set the record straight, no hard feelings at all Rundquist! You and I have always had lively debates, and neither of us has changed! We can be civil, and disagree. That makes all of this very interesting to me.


On the PPS, I have a Montecristi for Magnoli that I am going to turn into a hat, as soon as I can get time. I have done a couple, and really, they are much easier than felt hats to block. Felt is much more labor intensive.

On the welted edge, yeah, I can do those, but choose not to do so. I don't need that business. If I needed it, I would certainly do it though. I would have to find and invest in the plates used for welted edges though. I can also do bound edges, it ain't rocket science to do so, but I don't fancy hand sewing the ribbon, as I hate machinery. But again, if I needed that business, I would certainly branch out. So far, I have been very fortunate to have such a huge market for the raw edged Indy hat. It leaves me no time for the other stuff.


The Master Hatter term is mostly hype today. Ask any well known hatter who did not train under one!! One of the hatters who was my competition trained under a well known master hatter, and we beat him! So much for master hatters is all I can say. ;-) Now, don't take this as me bragging. I am a pretty humble guy, most days. And I have no delusions of being better than Art, Marc, or any number of handmade hatters out there. In fact, I consider myself only passable in the hatmaking deal. I never claimed to be the best at doing anything. I do think I have a decent eye for an Indy fedora, but I am not alone in that department here, on COW. So nothing special about me. But I was lucky is all I can say.

A true Master Hatter would be able to take a rodent pelt, and turn it into any number of hats. The term has been watered down, over the centuries to reflect what it is today. It is almost laughable, as this term is bantered about way too much. It doesn't mean much today in the world of hatmaking gadgetry....and I am being realistic here. Hatters today are basically machine operators, at best, and more than likely stay in their offices as hourly workers generate the Master Hatter's hats. That's a fact. With a few exceptions of course. There are always exceptions.

It would have been nice if we would have had a supplier for the Raiders type felt, and could have used that in the film. But, I have owned an HJ in that same felt, (wrong color) and I can safely say that this sort of felt is not being made today, at least from the 7 existing feltmakers in the world. The current HJ felt I get is too soft and thin and certainly would not hold up in looks. It would have put Bernie into the mental ward. He was distressed about the creases popping out in the action scenes as it was! But, you also did not try to mess with Harrison's hat during these sequences. You would have pulled back a nub! :lol: The only complaint I heard were the days Bernie was not on set. His standin did not do such a good job in keeping the hat styled the same.

On the height of the hat.....well, the HJs Bernie had from some of the prior films were the same crown height.....so, I am not sure what you mean. If you extend the ribbon width up on the pics I posted above of the Raiders fedora(before it shrunk) you will see the height is basically the same as we made. Remember, they picked the height, or Steven did. After being filmed in the wardrobe test. We were just giving them what was requested of us. The TOD and LC hats were a bit shorter, I will give you that. Even when new. And they certainly were stiffer hats than the Raiders fedoras. By the way, over the years I have reblocked older HJs that varied in crown height. From 5 inches up to 6. No consistency over the years in block, height, or color for that matter. It has been snake surprise in regards to them. But, we know for a fact the dimesions on the hats Bernie had in hand, and they were the same height as what we made, but had a 2 7/8 by 2 5/8 brim. But, it is obvious that some of the hats from the other 3 films varied in brim width and even crown height. No surprise here, to me.

In the end, we gave those guys what they wanted. We did pull a fast one and sent only the straighter sided blocks in, to choose from. :lol: Yeah, we did have an agenda, and were running the risk of losing the contract by doing what we did. We could have sent in 4 or 5 different blockshapes and let them choose, but we were afraid to do so!! Afraid they might pick the TOD block.

Now, I am way, way off topic as Bink has said, but I wanted to write a bit more on this subject.

Regarding Lee's new hat, I think he has a winner. And, I am glad Lee went with the same felt that I use. I know this felt really well. And, I would not pick any other over it. If a guy wants a hat as soft as beaver can be, I will soak the raw body in denatured alcohol for a week and leech out the shellac. I can do this, while the factories cannot do so, and still make money. I have done so in the past, and actually made one hat like this for the film. It is the one hanging off the crate, from the early PR pics. Used as a prop only. That hat would have driven Bernie nuts, putting the creases back in. Bernie approached the costume with the "form follows function" attitude. A pragmatist no doubt.

I had sent Lee's factory a block to try and copy for Lee's new hats, last year. Us Indy hat guys sorta stick together, behind the scenes. I helped out Ron at Hatsdirect as well. And Ken at Camptown. Marc and I certainly are not trying to be the only Indy hatters. But, I only offer help to members here. I am faithful to this crew. It would be a wise business decison NOT to do so, but honestly, this is still a great hobby to me, although I certainly make good money with my new site price. But at heart, I am still just an avid Indy fan and get my jollies from making these hats. I am the happiest when I am in the shop making hats. I am the unhappiest when my inbox has more emails than I have time to answer. But, that will change with time. And, I look forward to it.


One thing is for certain. We have such a huge and varied offering of Indy fedoras these days! And to me, that is as good as it gets. Several fan based hatters and retailers have emerged over the years. And, you have to admit that we did not have these choices way back when you and I were members of Indyfan.com. I still have those photos you posted way back on COW(I think) showing the comparion of one Indy fedora to a hat or two that you had. This was in regards to crown height. This was back when we were all(most of us) thinking the Indy fedora was taller than it actually was. We were all wearing 5 3/4 crowned hats back then. Once I started making hats, and seeing pics of them on folks here, I noticed right away I was making them to tall, at 5 3/4 open crown. I dropped down to 5 1/2 fairly fast. But, with this said, sometimes the hat does have to be taller to compensate for head size. But for most folks, the 5 1/4 to 5 1/2 seems to work out pretty good.

One last detail regarding the CS fedora. This hat to me, looks better if you drop the back down to 4, and the front to 4 1/2. Instead of the 4 1/4, and 4 3/4 height respectively. The way the block is shaped allows the hat to be actually a bit shorter looking when you use the lower creases. And, it defines the top crease much better, as some of the film hats look to be too shallow on the top.
To be honest, although your hat does look more like the Raiders hat at least superficially, it just doesn't move like the Raiders hat. It seemed like a hat better suited for "Oddjob" in Goldfinger

Yeah, I agree, that it does look Raider-esque, superficially. The felt is obviously way, way different. And, to date, I have not seen any felt, other than the vintage HJ mentioned above that is exactly like the rabbit felt in Raiders. And, the hat Oddjob wore was stiff enough to stand on, like the old stiff bowlers and derbies of yesteryear. You embellished that statement just a bit. :lol: Most of the hats we sent were actually fairly soft, as you can see in the film, in certain shots. Not in the same category as the Raiders fedora, but probably no more stiffer than some of the LC fedoras. But the felt is certanly expoentially denser than any of the other film hats. You can take one of these bodies and fill the crown with water and it will take a couple of hours before the hat will leak out the first drop of water. So yeah, the denseness keeps the noggin drier than rabbit. When John at Montana Hatters did this test, he used a vintage rabbit, and a lightweight body in pure beaver. The rabbit leaked in less than 15 minutes. Now, he was only testing to see which felt would keep a guy's head dry in a frog strangler. Nothing will beat out pure beaver in such a test. And, only one of the reasons we think pure beaver to be the only way to go, for an actual non costume hat. It may not rain in Southern California, but down here in the South, we get our share of rain. And I wear these pure beaver hats year round. We get lots of heat and humidity. I once bought a high dollar tight weave Montecristi, and honestly, that hat was as hot as my pure beaver felt hat. I was totally shocked. That tight weave you pay the big bucks for is extremly hot for such a light hat! And please don't get that baby wet!! :lol: Fedora

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:45 pm
by Rundquist
Fedora wrote:
PS- I’m sensing that you are getting a “sour grapes” vibe off of me, otherwise you wouldn’t have posted all that “in the end I was the guy chosen for Indy 4” business. I assure you I could really give a ####. I don’t have any stake in this whatsoever. I haven't bought a fedora in years.

PPS- I'm thinking about sending you a Montecristie for a reblock. Also I might send you a felt hat for a welted edge. Do you think you can help me out? "Master Hatter" doesn't mean much these days anyway, right

Sour grapes? Actually, I am not, although I can see how you might think so. But to set the record straight, no hard feelings at all Rundquist! You and I have always had lively debates, and neither of us has changed! We can be civil, and disagree. That makes all of this very interesting to me.


On the PPS, I have a Montecristi for Magnoli that I am going to turn into a hat, as soon as I can get time. I have done a couple, and really, they are much easier than felt hats to block. Felt is much more labor intensive.

On the welted edge, yeah, I can do those, but choose not to do so. I don't need that business. If I needed it, I would certainly do it though. I would have to find and invest in the plates used for welted edges though. I can also do bound edges, it ain't rocket science to do so, but I don't fancy hand sewing the ribbon, as I hate machinery. But again, if I needed that business, I would certainly branch out. So far, I have been very fortunate to have such a huge market for the raw edged Indy hat. It leaves me no time for the other stuff.


The Master Hatter term is mostly hype today. Ask any well known hatter who did not train under one!! One of the hatters who was my competition trained under a well known master hatter, and we beat him! So much for master hatters is all I can say. ;-) Now, don't take this as me bragging. I am a pretty humble guy, most days. And I have no delusions of being better than Art, Marc, or any number of handmade hatters out there. In fact, I consider myself only passable in the hatmaking deal. I never claimed to be the best at doing anything. I do think I have a decent eye for an Indy fedora, but I am not alone in that department here, on COW. So nothing special about me. But I was lucky is all I can say.

A true Master Hatter would be able to take a rodent pelt, and turn it into any number of hats. The term has been watered down, over the centuries to reflect what it is today. It is almost laughable, as this term is bantered about way too much. It doesn't mean much today in the world of hatmaking gadgetry....and I am being realistic here. Hatters today are basically machine operators, at best, and more than likely stay in their offices as hourly workers generate the Master Hatter's hats. That's a fact. With a few exceptions of course. There are always exceptions.

It would have been nice if we would have had a supplier for the Raiders type felt, and could have used that in the film. But, I have owned an HJ in that same felt, (wrong color) and I can safely say that this sort of felt is not being made today, at least from the 7 existing feltmakers in the world. The current HJ felt I get is too soft and thin and certainly would not hold up in looks. It would have put Bernie into the mental ward. He was distressed about the creases popping out in the action scenes as it was! But, you also did not try to mess with Harrison's hat during these sequences. You would have pulled back a nub! :lol: The only complaint I heard were the days Bernie was not on set. His standin did not do such a good job in keeping the hat styled the same.

On the height of the hat.....well, the HJs Bernie had from some of the prior films were the same crown height.....so, I am not sure what you mean. If you extend the ribbon width up on the pics I posted above of the Raiders fedora(before it shrunk) you will see the height is basically the same as we made. Remember, they picked the height, or Steven did. After being filmed in the wardrobe test. We were just giving them what was requested of us. The TOD and LC hats were a bit shorter, I will give you that. Even when new. And they certainly were stiffer hats than the Raiders fedoras. By the way, over the years I have reblocked older HJs that varied in crown height. From 5 inches up to 6. No consistency over the years in block, height, or color for that matter. It has been snake surprise in regards to them. But, we know for a fact the dimesions on the hats Bernie had in hand, and they were the same height as what we made, but had a 2 7/8 by 2 5/8 brim. But, it is obvious that some of the hats from the other 3 films varied in brim width and even crown height. No surprise here, to me.

In the end, we gave those guys what they wanted. We did pull a fast one and sent only the straighter sided blocks in, to choose from. :lol: Yeah, we did have an agenda, and were running the risk of losing the contract by doing what we did. We could have sent in 4 or 5 different blockshapes and let them choose, but we were afraid to do so!! Afraid they might pick the TOD block.

Now, I am way, way off topic as Bink has said, but I wanted to write a bit more on this subject.

Regarding Lee's new hat, I think he has a winner. And, I am glad Lee went with the same felt that I use. I know this felt really well. And, I would not pick any other over it. If a guy wants a hat as soft as beaver can be, I will soak the raw body in denatured alcohol for a week and leech out the shellac. I can do this, while the factories cannot do so, and still make money. I have done so in the past, and actually made one hat like this for the film. It is the one hanging off the crate, from the early PR pics. Used as a prop only. That hat would have driven Bernie nuts, putting the creases back in. Bernie approached the costume with the "form follows function" attitude. A pragmatist no doubt.

I had sent Lee's factory a block to try and copy for Lee's new hats, last year. Us Indy hat guys sorta stick together, behind the scenes. I helped out Ron at Hatsdirect as well. And Ken at Camptown. Marc and I certainly are not trying to be the only Indy hatters. But, I only offer help to members here. I am faithful to this crew. It would be a wise business decison NOT to do so, but honestly, this is still a great hobby to me, although I certainly make good money with my new site price. But at heart, I am still just an avid Indy fan and get my jollies from making these hats. I am the happiest when I am in the shop making hats. I am the unhappiest when my inbox has more emails than I have time to answer. But, that will change with time. And, I look forward to it.


One thing is for certain. We have such a huge and varied offering of Indy fedoras these days! And to me, that is as good as it gets. Several fan based hatters and retailers have emerged over the years. And, you have to admit that we did not have these choices way back when you and I were members of Indyfan.com. I still have those photos you posted way back on COW(I think) showing the comparion of one Indy fedora to a hat or two that you had. This was in regards to crown height. This was back when we were all(most of us) thinking the Indy fedora was taller than it actually was. We were all wearing 5 3/4 crowned hats back then. Once I started making hats, and seeing pics of them on folks here, I noticed right away I was making them to tall, at 5 3/4 open crown. I dropped down to 5 1/2 fairly fast. But, with this said, sometimes the hat does have to be taller to compensate for head size. But for most folks, the 5 1/4 to 5 1/2 seems to work out pretty good.

One last detail regarding the CS fedora. This hat to me, looks better if you drop the back down to 4, and the front to 4 1/2. Instead of the 4 1/4, and 4 3/4 height respectively. The way the block is shaped allows the hat to be actually a bit shorter looking when you use the lower creases. And, it defines the top crease much better, as some of the film hats look to be too shallow on the top.
To be honest, although your hat does look more like the Raiders hat at least superficially, it just doesn't move like the Raiders hat. It seemed like a hat better suited for "Oddjob" in Goldfinger

Yeah, I agree, that it does look Raider-esque, superficially. The felt is obviously way, way different. And, to date, I have not seen any felt, other than the vintage HJ mentioned above that is exactly like the rabbit felt in Raiders. And, the hat Oddjob wore was stiff enough to stand on, like the old stiff bowlers and derbies of yesteryear. You embellished that statement just a bit. :lol: Most of the hats we sent were actually fairly soft, as you can see in the film, in certain shots. Not in the same category as the Raiders fedora, but probably no more stiffer than some of the LC fedoras. But the felt is certanly expoentially denser than any of the other film hats. You can take one of these bodies and fill the crown with water and it will take a couple of hours before the hat will leak out the first drop of water. So yeah, the denseness keeps the noggin drier than rabbit. When John at Montana Hatters did this test, he used a vintage rabbit, and a lightweight body in pure beaver. The rabbit leaked in less than 15 minutes. Now, he was only testing to see which felt would keep a guy's head dry in a frog strangler. Nothing will beat out pure beaver in such a test. And, only one of the reasons we think pure beaver to be the only way to go, for an actual non costume hat. It may not rain in Southern California, but down here in the South, we get our share of rain. And I wear these pure beaver hats year round. We get lots of heat and humidity. I once bought a high dollar tight weave Montecristi, and honestly, that hat was as hot as my pure beaver felt hat. I was totally shocked. That tight weave you pay the big bucks for is extremly hot for such a light hat! And please don't get that baby wet!! :lol: Fedora

I agree that the term “master hatter” can be attributed as a marketing tool. I used it as an adjective. Not once have I heard Graham refer to himself in that regard. I have however seen the term used many times by members on this board to describe Indy hat makers. Let’s face it. We are a society in which “hype” plays a huge role.

I’m not a hatter, so I won’t dispute your ideas on Montecristie hat blocking. I’ll just give my experience. I had a friend that tried to save a few bucks by buying a hat body and having it blocked by a hatter. The hatter just could not get it right. He then sent it to Graham and it came out perfect. The thing is that it’s not an isolated incident. I’ve heard about others with the same experience. A tight weaved Montecristie can have less air moving through it than a looser weaved one, I agree. Some people also shellac them to help keep the shape and that defeats the purpose. However, the light “feel” of a Montecristie is unparalleled. The weight of beaver is actually one of the things that I dislike about it. I can understand being in a cold climate where one might like the “cozy” feel of beaver. But for me it’s the pitts.

No one would ever dispute how long you’ve been at the Indy hat (years of research) and what you’ve given to the hobby. I actually am kind of sorry that you had to become involved in this thread at all. Although you were happy to do it, it could be said that you’ve “given too much”. There are people on this board (some of them are fans and some of them are hatters) that were “born on third base and they think that they’ve hit a home run”. Cheers

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:26 pm
by fedoralover
Well this has really been an interesting thread to read through. I wasn't going to post anything in it but for those that haven't been here as long as some of us I thought I should. And Adam I only do so because one might think that after reading all of your posts about Optimo, one would think that they never mess up and Steve does. Maybe you didn't mean it that way, but with all due respect, it kinda came off that way to me.

I remember when you first found Optimo and posted about them here and posted pics of their hats. I really liked the look and my first one wasn't even an Indy hat, it was a regular fedora in London Gray. I e-mailed Graham the exact specs I wanted. When it arrived it wasn't what I ordered, wrong ribbon and wrong crown height, plus the felt on the brim wasn't pounced out evenly. I sent it back and he fixed the felt and changed the ribbon. It's still one of my favorite hats to this day.

My next one I did want to be an Indy fedora, again I sent the exact specs I wanted. Again it came back different than what I ordered. I decided to save the extra $25.00 in shipping and live with it. But not too long after I got it, it got damp and the crown shrunk horribly, not just a little, it looked like a dunce hat. I was going to just through it away it was so bad. But at that time Steve was starting to reblock hats and I sent it to him and he ended up making it look presentable again.

A few years ago I wanted a nice dress fedora in black and they are actually kinda rare on ebay in the crown height and brim size I wanted. I asked Steve to make me one. I e-mailed him the exact specs I wanted. When I got it, it was exactly what I ordered. The ribbon had hidden stitches in the bow loops just like Optimo does. It isn't an Indy hat at all, just a nice dress fedora in black.

Last year I visited Art Fawcett and he had one of Optimo's 100% beaver felt fedora's that someone had sent him to fix. The edge binding around the brim was all puckered. It wasn't too impressive for a $700 hat.

Now I know you have had a lot of Optimo's and maybe all of your's were perfect. But nobody hits a homer everytime. Steve will admit he doesn't, but neither does Optimo.

I also bought an Optimo off ebay a while back for a friend, he ended up not wanting it and I sold it since it wasn't my size. It was a Navy Blue and it looked great, nothing wrong with it at all. I also happen to have a Navy Blue fedora I had Art Fawcett make for me, so I could compare the two. Art's was just as nice and the felt was even a little softer. The big difference was the price.

This isn't to bash Optimo, I know they make great fedora's, I've seen the pics of yours and I always thought you looked great in them and they always looked great, but they aren't perfect either. And for the price I'd choose Steve or Art any day, knowing I would get just as good at half the price.

fedoralover

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:46 pm
by Kim Hoffman
A bound brim strengthens the brim and helps to support its shape. But not all hats look good bounded. It depends on the hat and personal choice.

The binding in the photo above is nicely done, though.

The hat conformer will give an exact measurement and the contour of one's head. Heads come in all shapes and sizes. On me, the oval/long oval tends to veer to the right, and I generally have to do some steaming to improve the fit. The disadvantage is that a hat made from the Hat Conformer tends to be snug. And as the leather hatband shrinks it grows tighter, so you need a hat stretcher to keep it from shrinking.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:58 pm
by Kim Hoffman
The Optimo hats look good on their site. But fedoras, like everything else have changed over the years, and their crowns are shorter than in the past. And for an Indy hat it's the past we're after.

AB has a fine selection of vintage style hats. Steve and Marc have done their homework. As for the question of fur, beaver for an Indy should be mandatory. Because the hat on your head symbolizes a life of sex and danger and the beaver will hold up better to both. (Real men don't take their hats off even in bed.)

The Keppler hat looks great. He understands what's necessary in an older style fedora.

But, with wear, and care, the stiffness associated with beaver will soften over time.

Besides, the majority of people who will look at your hat and envy it probably know nothing about hats. Which gives you an opportunity to lecture them about the art.

As an aside, if you in the market for a reasonably priced fedora, you might be better off exploring some of the western/cowboy hat stores, as they are more familiar with older styles of hats, and higher crowns. You have to look around because cowboy hats are as expensive as AB or Optimo.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:27 pm
by Rundquist
fedoralover wrote:Well this has really been an interesting thread to read through. I wasn't going to post anything in it but for those that haven't been here as long as some of us I thought I should. And Adam I only do so because one might think that after reading all of your posts about Optimo, one would think that they never mess up and Steve does. Maybe you didn't mean it that way, but with all due respect, it kinda came off that way to me.

I remember when you first found Optimo and posted about them here and posted pics of their hats. I really liked the look and my first one wasn't even an Indy hat, it was a regular fedora in London Gray. I e-mailed Graham the exact specs I wanted. When it arrived it wasn't what I ordered, wrong ribbon and wrong crown height, plus the felt on the brim wasn't pounced out evenly. I sent it back and he fixed the felt and changed the ribbon. It's still one of my favorite hats to this day.

My next one I did want to be an Indy fedora, again I sent the exact specs I wanted. Again it came back different than what I ordered. I decided to save the extra $25.00 in shipping and live with it. But not too long after I got it, it got damp and the crown shrunk horribly, not just a little, it looked like a dunce hat. I was going to just through it away it was so bad. But at that time Steve was starting to reblock hats and I sent it to him and he ended up making it look presentable again.

A few years ago I wanted a nice dress fedora in black and they are actually kinda rare on ebay in the crown height and brim size I wanted. I asked Steve to make me one. I e-mailed him the exact specs I wanted. When I got it, it was exactly what I ordered. The ribbon had hidden stitches in the bow loops just like Optimo does. It isn't an Indy hat at all, just a nice dress fedora in black.

Last year I visited Art Fawcett and he had one of Optimo's 100% beaver felt fedora's that someone had sent him to fix. The edge binding around the brim was all puckered. It wasn't too impressive for a $700 hat.

Now I know you have had a lot of Optimo's and maybe all of your's were perfect. But nobody hits a homer everytime. Steve will admit he doesn't, but neither does Optimo.

I also bought an Optimo off ebay a while back for a friend, he ended up not wanting it and I sold it since it wasn't my size. It was a Navy Blue and it looked great, nothing wrong with it at all. I also happen to have a Navy Blue fedora I had Art Fawcett make for me, so I could compare the two. Art's was just as nice and the felt was even a little softer. The big difference was the price.

This isn't to bash Optimo, I know they make great fedora's, I've seen the pics of yours and I always thought you looked great in them and they always looked great, but they aren't perfect either. And for the price I'd choose Steve or Art any day, knowing I would get just as good at half the price.

fedoralover
Like I said, I really don't care about hats or hat makers. I'm not invested in them (emotionally or otherwise). I sort of used Optimo as a “sacrificial lamb” for some of the points that I wanted to make (nobody buys them around here anyway). I knew that many here with opposite opinions would be screaming bloody murder after some of the things I had to say.

Everyone has different experiences. We all have to accept that not everyone is going to feel the same way about things as we do. This has been my main point in all this. The guy that I sold my Optimo Indy hat to (literally years ago) just got his AB from Steve last month. He was “under whelmed” with it. He liked the feel of the old Optimo better. On the flip side, I am well aware that some people don’t like Optimo, or have had bad experience with them. But so what, either way? Anyone that produces anything, is going to have customers that have problems with their product, it’s that simple.

My Optimo hats have pretty much all been nice. What do you expect me to say? That’s been my experience. Does the fact that other people have had contradicting experiences make me a liar? I get the feeling that some of you don’t believe me.

Again I bring up Optimo (to illustrate my points) because almost nobody on this board gives a #### about them. Nobody gets hurt, well nobody that you guys care about anyway. The fact that I am selling all mine is purely coincidental. I’m done with fedoras (of any kind) forever.

I’m going to make one final analogy and hopefully my point will be made and I’ll be done with this. I was taught that the components of music are melody, harmony, and rhythm. By that definition it could be argued that the greatest music ever engineered is Salsa music. It’s got aces in every category. There is no other music that utilizes every aspect of the components of music as well. It’s got complex polyrhythms. It’s got complex harmony. It’s got flowing melodies. It’s got improvisation. It’s the bomb. And yet if I told you that you had to like it, or “you don’t know anything about music”, you’d all say that I was off my rocker. But why wouldn’t you like it? I already explained that it’s the best thing out there. Cheers

PS- Just to clarify, Optimo was never the issue.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:33 pm
by Michaelson
I get the feeling that some of you don’t believe me
No. Quite honestly, some of us don't care one way or the other, and haven't since this thread went down this path. :[ :lol: ;-)

Optimo, AB, Fed, what ever. Buy what you want and like, and if you have a question, I'm sure someone will find a reason to either agree or disagree with anything that's posted or suggested.

That said, what the heck WAS the original topic of this discussion? :-s

Oh yeah, comparison of Lee's hat and an AB....now I remember.... :-k

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:35 pm
by Rundquist
Kim Hoffman wrote:The Optimo hats look good on their site. But fedoras, like everything else have changed over the years, and their crowns are shorter than in the past. And for an Indy hat it's the past we're after.

AB has a fine selection of vintage style hats. Steve and Marc have done their homework. As for the question of fur, beaver for an Indy should be mandatory. Because the hat on your head symbolizes a life of sex and danger and the beaver will hold up better to both. (Real men don't take their hats off even in bed.)

The Keppler hat looks great. He understands what's necessary in an older style fedora.

But, with wear, and care, the stiffness associated with beaver will soften over time.

Besides, the majority of people who will look at your hat and envy it probably know nothing about hats. Which gives you an opportunity to lecture them about the art.

As an aside, if you in the market for a reasonably priced fedora, you might be better off exploring some of the western/cowboy hat stores, as they are more familiar with older styles of hats, and higher crowns. You have to look around because cowboy hats are as expensive as AB or Optimo.
Sigh ](*,)

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:37 pm
by Rundquist
Michaelson wrote:
I get the feeling that some of you don’t believe me
No. Quite honestly, some of us don't care one way or the other, and haven't since this thread went down this path. :[ :lol: ;-)

Optimo, AB, Fed, what ever. Buy what you want and like, and if you have a question, I'm sure someone will find a reason to either agree or disagree with anything that's posted or suggested.

That said, what the heck WAS the original topic of this discussion? :-s

Oh yeah, comparison of Lee's hat and an AB....now I remember.... :-k

Regards! Michaelson

But some people do care. At least the ones that have contacted me.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:39 pm
by Michaelson
Then you need to take it offline or over to the Fedora Lounge. This got old yesterday, and one warning shot has already been fired by a moderator.

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:43 pm
by Rundquist
Michaelson wrote:Then you need to take it offline. This got old yesterday, and one warning shot has already been fired by a moderator.

Regards! Michaelson

:roll:

Zap the whole thing except the hat comparison stuff, then. Sorry you’re bored by all of this “buddy”.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:43 pm
by Michaelson
No problem, old "friend." :-s

Just drop it and let what's been written soak in for a while without continuing to beat the proverbial dead horse.

Back to topic.

Michaelson

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:23 pm
by Pitfall Harry
Does anyone have anymore shots of Lee's new Indy hat. I'd like to see more pics of it. ;-)

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:25 pm
by DR Ulloa
There are some photos in this thread, though none are too flattering due to the arms length and bathroom mirror shots.

viewtopic.php?t=36346

Dave

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 8:34 am
by Undecagon
Ha, yea, well it's a new hat so i don't have many photos at all, but these are some better ones I got over Thanksgiving break.

Image
Image

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:05 am
by binkmeisterRick
Since this thread is so far off topic now, and since the question has essentially been answered a page or so back with nothing relevant really being added since, I'm going ahead and locking this one down. There are other threads open where folks can show off their new Kepplers when they arrive.

Image