However, my gunsmith does not think that that is what was done and he points out some very interesting observations that I point out below:

1) At point "1" we can see that the sight has been "pinned" on to the barrel. It may have also been soldered but we can't really tell.
2) This is the most revealing point. The unfinished part of the barrel is NOT part of the rest of the barrel. IT IS A TOTALLY DIFFERENT PIECE!! We can see in the photo that at point "2" the "W" in Wesson is cut in half. We see the back half of the "W" on the main part of the barrel but we don't see the front half of the "W" on the nose! If the bluing was simply sanded away or otherwise removed it still would have left the front half of the stamped "W". These are 2 different parts connected together!
3) At point "3" we can see a bit of a gap and uneveness between the two parts.
4) We can see the horizontal serrations in the nose of the barrel that should also be seen in the main part of the barrel even through the bluing. Also if the nose was sanded or filed to remove the bluing the serations should run vertical around the barrel and not horizontal as we see here. The two parts just look too different to be the same barrel.
My gunsmith thinks that this is either the barrel nose of some other gun attached to the front of the S&W with a sleeve or dowel. Or it could be some sort of "band" that slips over a machined off front section of the S&W. He feels stronger about the "band" idea as we do know the gun was fired so some type of internal sleeve or dowel would make it difficult or impossible to fire. We also see that pin at the base of the front sight which could be actually holding the band onto the machined S&W nose.
I bring this up so that we can start a discussion on these newly discovered facts. I know that the "band" idea has been out there but was discarded for the sanded nose theory. With this new perspective we may need to bring back the "band" theory once again!
Let the analysis begin!
