


Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg
Actually his second and third photos show the grain very well.Fortune and Glory wrote:Hey PSB --
Great jacket! Could you please post an extreme close up of the hide to show the grain more clearly in even light? I know it's variable of course, but maybe a light and dense section for comparison?
Always? You have me confused with someone else.Fortune and Glory wrote:RCS --
I would appreciate your not always telling people what they think or what they mean.
Fortune and Glory wrote:The second and third pictures to me are NOT representative of the typical Nowak shrunken lamb grain, at least judging by other jackets seen previously.
The 'dino hide' effect was because of the photography, you are correct about that.Fortune and Glory wrote:As Baldwyn notes, this texture looks in between the shrunken and matte we have seen from Tony previously. It is much less 'dino hide' than previous jackets that have been photographed.
BUT, it may well be the photography. Nowaks in general photograph with much less of a pronounced grain than they have in hand, as I also have come to believe the original film jacket did. A close up -- as I asked for -- would resolve this. The current pictures do not, despite that you say they do.
I'm not suggesting you call anyone. Just relating about the texture of his jacket in the photos as compared to mine, and it is a very good representation.Fortune and Glory wrote:RCS --
Again, you're telling me how things are. I have been to Tony's shop personally, thank you very much -- so don't worry, no need for a call. I have seen Raiders I jackets piled high atop his table -- probably many more than you have ever seen in your life -- some going out to names I recognize from this forum. The shrunken lamb texture here looks different to me, and different from the majority of those I have seen photographed. There is less consistent and pronounced 'pebbling' for lack of a better word. It's hard to put into words accurately, but I'd know it on sight in a second. An almost snakeskin quality. Much more akin to the matte lamb.
Again, I believe the lack of this appearance is due to PSB's photography and the level of light in his pictures. And again, a nice close up of a section under even light would be EXACTLY what I would need to confirm.
But hey, YOU keep telling me what I need...
I will in a few days, when we get some better outdoor light up hereFortune and Glory wrote:Then RCS, please post pictures of yours. That would be very helpful.
I completely disagree with you that Nowaks look the same from wider to closer angles. The leather 'smoothes' out considerably in the wides of every example I've ever seen. A close up of the surface of the leather would be incredibly helpful, as would more even lighting. To me, this change in texture and appearance -- bumpy to smooth, light to dark -- is the greatest indicator that shrunken lamb was used in the film.
Also, the hides from Tony have been remarkably consistent, despite of course having some variation. Everyone's has had a very similar and distinct look. If yours looks like PSB's, I'd love to see exactly what that is.
My guess is Whiskeyman's, until we have full confirmation.Kevin Anderson wrote:So, who does belong to the jacket RC pictured?
In another thread it was speculated that it might be Chris King's. But if it's not his, who owns it? Looks nice.
I wouldn't say mine weighs as much as my TN4, but the hide is certainly thicker feeling and more substantial feeling than the authentic lamb of my ToD.Indiana Holt wrote:aha..
thats why the hide looks different.
I thought there was something ''wrong'' with it.
now that you say it is thick and weighs almost as much as you cowhide jacket, I begin to wonder if Tony has used the New Zeeland lambskin like the skin on Gmann's jacket.
Gmann's jacket is a heavy, grainy/structur, thick lambskin. looks a little like yours...
of course I could be very wrong...