Bi-swing back vs. A-2 design

Discuss all of the intricacies of the jacket in full detail

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg

Post Reply
pwd
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2002 9:45 pm
Location: Texas

Bi-swing back vs. A-2 design

Post by pwd »

The Raiders jacket, as well as the Navy's G-1 have an action back, designed to expand, whereas the Air Force A-2 has a one piece back. I have a G&B Expedition and am contemplating purchasing an A-2. Can someone comment on whether there is a difference in comfort between the two designs? Do the bi-swing back and underarm gussets really make that big a difference in wearability? Thanks for the input!
User avatar
Flattery
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:11 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Flattery »

During my Navy days, I was stationed at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, and worked as a Hospital Corpsman at the med clinic. I made friends with one of the pilots (even though I wasn't supposed to) -- he gave me his G-1 when I left the base and I still have it. I've worn an A-2 as well -- I like the A-2 better. The G-1 is still nice, though. If I were you, I'd go with the A-2, no questions asked.

Just my two cents.

Cheers,
~Flattery
User avatar
Bufflehead Jones
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3191
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Bufflehead Jones »

Hey Flattery,

The Naval Air Station is only 30 minutes from where I live.
User avatar
Flattery
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:11 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Flattery »

Not a bad area. I especially liked Solomon Island.
Lemon
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post by Lemon »

Hey PWD,

The A-2 is a classic design and with the knit cuffs and waistband an excellent choice for winter wear. I haven't found my A-2 to be a problem without the action back.

Depending on the manufacturer, there is some give in the arms for movement. The only exception is when raising hands above your head; then the jacket rides up at the waist. Not a great problem, just an annoyance if you have stuff clipped to your belt like cell phone, blackberry, knife, gun, etc. You have to tug your jacket back down around those items.
User avatar
zeus36
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 462
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:23 am
Location: Ventura County, California

Re: Bi-swing back vs. A-2 design

Post by zeus36 »

pwd wrote:The Raiders jacket, as well as the Navy's G-1 have an action back, designed to expand, whereas the Air Force A-2 has a one piece back. I have a G&B Expedition and am contemplating purchasing an A-2. Can someone comment on whether there is a difference in comfort between the two designs? Do the bi-swing back and underarm gussets really make that big a difference in wearability? Thanks for the input!
"YES" it does make a difference in wearability depending on your build and the tasks you will be accomplishing with the jacket. If you're slim then lack of bi-swing will not be a problem.

There are reasons that the bi-swing back was developed in the first place.....
But if you are a pilot sitting in a cockpit with a stick between your legs and your arms pretty much at your sides- shoulder movement is minimal.

I would suggest asking G&B how much $$ to incorporate those features into an A-2 that is being constructed. But I don't think they are taking custom modifications for a few months (according to the receptionist there)
Indiana Joe
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 897
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 10:13 pm
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Indiana Joe »

Flattery wrote:....he gave me his G-1 when I left the base and I still have it. I've worn an A-2 as well -- I like the A-2 better. The G-1 is still nice, though. If I were you, I'd go with the A-2, no questions asked.
Flattery, what is that you like about the A-2 over the G-1? Just curious.

I.J.
User avatar
Flattery
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:11 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Flattery »

I like the overall look better than the G-1. The G-1 I have has the pilot's fuzzy collar, and even though I like it on that jacket, I like having a simple leather collar. The A-2 was lighter and breathed better in warmer weather. Really it's just a personal preference and aesthetics.
Lao Feng
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 8:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in the Past

Post by Lao Feng »

G & B offers the AN-J-3...which is the G-1 with plain leather collar. Exact same as G-1...gussets, bi-swing back and belted in back...just not fur collar and they add ther A2 wind flap over zipper. Sounds like a good compromise.
User avatar
Flattery
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:11 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Flattery »

Hmm... *strokes chin* I should look into that...
pwd
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2002 9:45 pm
Location: Texas

Post by pwd »

Thanks for the input, fellas...
pwd
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2002 9:45 pm
Location: Texas

Post by pwd »

I went ahead and ordered a Gibson & Barnes Civil A-2. The bad part? They said the jacket would not be made for two months...
User avatar
Flattery
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:11 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Flattery »

It won't even be MADE for two months? :roll:
pwd
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2002 9:45 pm
Location: Texas

Post by pwd »

That's right--ordered on September 1. Expected delivery in November. They must be busy.
User avatar
Flattery
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:11 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Flattery »

Sounds like it. I'm sure it will be worth the wait, I've heard good things about their jackets. Hang in there, buddy.
Post Reply