Page 1 of 1

WWII Canadian Webley Holsters

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:52 pm
by Rob
I have found an Aussie cache of WWII Canadian Webley holsters. Does anyone have such a thing already to comment on whether they are good/bad/indifferent?

No pictures yet... will endeavour to go and check them out this lunchtime.

Price? AUD$25 each... which is US$17.86 :shock:

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:00 pm
by IndyBlues
$17.86 US, huh??? To quote Arte Johnson:
Veeeeedddyy intedesting!

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:00 pm
by Rob
Just to set expectations, I did some quick research, and it looks like Canada went to the following style in 1937, which probably is what my informant is referring to as WWII gear... I will double check, but just to set expectations, what I just found might be this:

Image

:cry: :cry: :cry:

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:22 pm
by Amaziah Rimfire
Yes, that's the one! It attaches to the belt with a pair of brass C-clips on the back and has a slot inside for a cleaning rod. It's not "Indy", though.

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:28 pm
by Rob
Just heard back... as suspected, they are this model :(

Sorry to get everyone excited...

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:02 pm
by skywlkr
Aren't the Webley holsters we are after the WWI variety rather than WWII. I think even the British used canvas holsters in WWII (correct me if I'm wrong).

Luke

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:02 pm
by Amaziah Rimfire
Yes, you want the WWI ones. I have a couple of the WWII Canadian web holsters. My S&W Victory model fits perfectly, and a .380 Webley or Enfield would fit well too. Not sure if a large frame revolver like the S&W HE2 or the Colt New Service would fit.

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:08 pm
by Michaelson
The old Webley .455 MK VI was retired as primary Military British sidearm just prior to WW2, though a few saw action in the home guard. The Mk IV .38 (.380 British) replaced it, and carried a 200 gr. full metal jacketed bullet that was supposed to be equal in knock down power as the stubby .455. I guess theorically it could have, but after holding a .455 shell, and the replacement .380 British, one can only wonder if they were off their rocker when they made the change, as the size comparison is like comparing a large truck to a sedan. But, the .455 was originally a black powder round, with the .380 smokeless, and the .455 didn't transistion well to the smokeless power (metalurgical problems with the gun frame), so it was downgraded to backup status in the arsonel. The MK IV is probably 2/3 the size of the .455, and so the holster IS quite a bit smaller. Regards. Michaelson

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:15 pm
by Fedora jr.
Michaelson, you are too smart my friend.

Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:03 pm
by Michaelson
Wish I could remember the important stuff....like where I leave my car keys and the like. :? :wink: Regards. Michaelson

Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:13 pm
by binkmeisterRick
Just keep 'em next to the coffee, my friend. Bingo. Problem solved. :wink:

bink

Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:14 pm
by Michaelson
Now THAT'S a GOOD idea! :D Regards. Michaelson

canadian holsters

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:28 pm
by jack
rob,
are the holsters 37 pattern?
if they are then there won't be much/if any difference, i use an australian issue 37 pattern pistol holster which is in unnisued condition, thats no different to the british, the canadian ones you have will be the same,
post some pictures and i'll tell you for sure then but they will not be any different to british issue afterall its the same patern of equipment


captain j burtonwood

webley revolvers

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:37 pm
by jack
your right michelson,
the .38 200grain does not compare to the .455
the mark 4 webley had no stopping power!! There is an account that a british officer at opperation goodwood fired his mark 4 webley six times at a german at 20 yards!! six rounds to bring someone down, the .455 would knock someone into the other world at 20 yards.


captain j burtonwood