Well aged DelCarpio?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:51 am
I'm sure I'm not alone in this, but it seems pretty easy to distinguish an "Indy" whip's maker just by looking at it. For example...
Morgans: The new handle design is unmistakable, and the older ones have the unmistakable aged look.
Strains: Flawlessly cut strands and tight plaiting.
DelCaprios: Blasts from the past, as far as Morgans go, but identified by their "youthful" look.
Nolands: I can't put my finger on what it is, but the thong shape or overlay stands out to me.
My though, however, is that an aged Delcaprio would be indistinguishable from the highly valued Morgans of yesteryear. Anyone one disagree, or own an aged DelCaprio to prove/disprove my theory? Also, does anyone have an "off-brand" Indy that they think cannot be distinguished from a Morgan? Care to share a picture and test us?
Dang it though...why does it seems there's no mistaking a Morgan, no matter how young or old? Maybe it's because I owned one, but as soon as I see one (even a picture) my brain sends off a flare.
Morgans: The new handle design is unmistakable, and the older ones have the unmistakable aged look.
Strains: Flawlessly cut strands and tight plaiting.
DelCaprios: Blasts from the past, as far as Morgans go, but identified by their "youthful" look.
Nolands: I can't put my finger on what it is, but the thong shape or overlay stands out to me.
My though, however, is that an aged Delcaprio would be indistinguishable from the highly valued Morgans of yesteryear. Anyone one disagree, or own an aged DelCaprio to prove/disprove my theory? Also, does anyone have an "off-brand" Indy that they think cannot be distinguished from a Morgan? Care to share a picture and test us?
Dang it though...why does it seems there's no mistaking a Morgan, no matter how young or old? Maybe it's because I owned one, but as soon as I see one (even a picture) my brain sends off a flare.