Page 1 of 1

'Simple Confusion'

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:29 pm
by Raider Of The Lost Ark
Really sorry, when describing 'back length' does everyone include 'collar stand' (ROTLA). So 23"/24" or 25" back length, as described, would that be from the very bottom of the jacket to the bottom edge of the collar itself INCLUDING the extra bit of leather that I assume is the 'stand'? :Plymouth:

Re: 'Simple Confusion'

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:50 pm
by Holt
the back length is measured from the bottom of the collarstand seam to the end fo the jacket. ;)

Re: 'Simple Confusion'

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 4:39 pm
by Raider Of The Lost Ark
Indiana Holt wrote:the back length is measured from the bottom of the collarstand seam to the end fo the jacket. ;)
Thanks! However because I've had a weekend from ####, funeral to follow, I just need to confirm that the piece between the collar and back panel is not counted as part of the back length? Sorry my minds a mess.

Re: 'Simple Confusion'

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 4:43 pm
by Holt
nope. the collarstand is not included.

Re: 'Simple Confusion'

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:35 am
by Michaelson
I know that's been a piece of confusion indeed. That's why I always post 'measured from the BOTTOM of the collar stand to bottom of the jacket' when I talk about back measurements.

As Holt has said....twice....no, you do NOT include the collar stand in a jacket back measurement.

Regards! Michaelson

Re: 'Simple Confusion'

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:13 am
by Raider Of The Lost Ark
Michaelson wrote:I know that's been a piece of confusion indeed. That's why I always post 'measured from the BOTTOM of the collar stand to bottom of the jacket' when I talk about back measurements.

As Holt has said....twice....no, you do NOT include the collar stand in a jacket back measurement.

Regards! Michaelson
Very kind. Yeah I saw one of your posts earier. Dang that meens my jacket is an inch shorter than Id asked for. 'Custom', ahem, I suppose it is from "a certain point of view". Man this week just gets 'better and better'

:cry:

Re: 'Simple Confusion'

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:22 am
by Kevin Anderson
Back it goes then. Or should go.