Page 1 of 2

Just ordered a G&B Expedition!!!

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:51 pm
by Shagbd
Ok..... First it was whips....... Then a MkVII.... then the freakin expensive Aldens....... and now..... a Expedition!!! (Do folks call um Expos?)

Im really excited about getting this jacket, It was recommended to me by Paul Nolan, and also from all the great reviews I've read on it.....

BTW, its gonna be in GOAT, cause i hear its pretty Tuff!

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:53 pm
by binkmeisterRick
Congrats! I got to see several G&B jackets at the QM Summit and I can tell you you're in for what heck of a jacket! They're well made and should last you several lifetimes!

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:56 pm
by crismans
Congrats! I've never seen an Expo (Expe) but from everything (I mean everything) I've read, they are very SA and built like a proverbial tank.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:03 pm
by JC1972
Where down South are you? I have lamb because of the weather here in FL and its not thin by any means. Still tough though.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:32 pm
by Rundquist
Great choice. It will outlast you for sure. :Dietrich:

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:27 pm
by MFC
I got a G&B goat a few weeks ago. You will not be disappointed.

-Matt

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:45 pm
by Shagbd
ive done a lil searching but found no definative answer.... but just exactly HOW accurate are they?

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:52 pm
by Indiana G
they were patterned after a raiders stunt jacket and were tweaked for real world durability. an excellent, durable jacket from all the reviews i have seen. it will outlast most of the other indy jacket offerings out there.

for an extreme stitch nazi like myself, i prefer other venues ;-)

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:59 pm
by CM
It's very accurate. Remember many jackets were used in Raiders. This is based on one of them, with a few minor tweaks to make it stronger.

My view has always been I want a jacket like the one in the film only better (ie more functional and better quality)

From what I've seen of the new Tony Nowak Raiders, the G&B is about as accurate as that one. I hear it's as well made too.

It could even be argued that anyone who wants a more accurate jacket than a G&B is clinically insane or just stupidly picky. But it's a free world (or part of it is anyway...) :lol: :-k

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:17 am
by Indiana G
CM wrote:It's very accurate. Remember many jackets were used in Raiders. This is based on one of them, with a few minor tweaks to make it stronger.

My view has always been I want a jacket like the one in the film only better (ie more functional and better quality)

From what I've seen of the new Tony Nowak Raiders, the G&B is about as accurate as that one. I hear it's as well made too.

It could even be argued that anyone who wants a more accurate jacket than a G&B is clinically insane or just stupidly picky. But it's a free world (or part of it is anyway...) :lol: :-k
it may be argued that i'm insane, but i am far from stupid which is why i resent that remark. this hobby has alot of levels and niches and all of them should be respected by all members of the community. from my understanding of your jacket preference CM, i know that you prefer real world to prop replica and that is what you aim your money at.....but making a comment about how G&B is as accurate as a TN is placed in ignorance in my opinion and you should definitely look past your reinforced stitching and proper zippers and seams to understand that. if i wanted a jacket that would be resilient to the effects of time and to be fashionable forever, i wouldn't pick an indy-style jacket to fit the bill. i enjoy buying indy jackets because i want it as close to the screen jacket as possible....imperfections and all. that is where my enjoyment emanates from. to call it stupid is just plain ignorant.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:38 pm
by Rundquist
Indiana G wrote:
CM wrote:It's very accurate. Remember many jackets were used in Raiders. This is based on one of them, with a few minor tweaks to make it stronger.

My view has always been I want a jacket like the one in the film only better (ie more functional and better quality)

From what I've seen of the new Tony Nowak Raiders, the G&B is about as accurate as that one. I hear it's as well made too.

It could even be argued that anyone who wants a more accurate jacket than a G&B is clinically insane or just stupidly picky. But it's a free world (or part of it is anyway...) :lol: :-k
it may be argued that i'm insane, but i am far from stupid which is why i resent that remark. this hobby has alot of levels and niches and all of them should be respected by all members of the community. from my understanding of your jacket preference CM, i know that you prefer real world to prop replica and that is what you aim your money at.....but making a comment about how G&B is as accurate as a TN is placed in ignorance in my opinion and you should definitely look past your reinforced stitching and proper zippers and seams to understand that. if i wanted a jacket that would be resilient to the effects of time and to be fashionable forever, i wouldn't pick an indy-style jacket to fit the bill. i enjoy buying indy jackets because i want it as close to the screen jacket as possible....imperfections and all. that is where my enjoyment emanates from. to call it stupid is just plain ignorant.

I think CM's tongue was placed firmly in cheek on that one. He said that it could be argued, he didn't actually call anyone stupid. Cheers


PS-His point was that the G&B Expo. is a great choice for “prudent” people. I ordered a TN Raiders, but I admit that there is a little voice inside telling me that it’s crazy to spend that kind of money on a jacket.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:52 pm
by Michaelson
Rundquist wrote:
I think CM's tongue was placed firmly in cheek on that one.
Don't you just hate when CM does that?! It makes it next to impossible to understand a word he says. :? :roll:

:lol: ;-)

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:57 pm
by Rundquist
Michaelson wrote:
Rundquist wrote:
I think CM's tongue was placed firmly in cheek on that one.
Don't you just hate when CM does that?! It makes it next to impossible to understand a word he says. :? :roll:

:lol: ;-)

Regards! Michaelson

Sometimes it is very hard to distinguish words from intent. :?

Not that I'm putting words in his mouth. That's just my interpretation.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:19 pm
by Indiana G
if it were just this post, perhaps i would have let it go. but this one followed another post where he addressed and enquirry of mine as "screen idiocy".....and that's why i'm drawing a line in the sand now.

i don't take kindly to words like stupid and idiot or whatever derivations have you for these terms regardless if they are 'tongue in cheek' posts. i also don't take kindly to CM's views on jackets......period. CM, your view is narrow and uneducated as anyone that falls outside your justifications on what makes a good jacket is "moronic" in your eyes. may i ask what items you have purchased in your tenure here to give you that much weight in your perceived opinion?

posting your opinion is fine. lambasting others for theirs is not. it shows poor form but i guess thats what is expected from you......now, how's that for ignorant?

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:21 pm
by Michaelson
Whoa! Let's not fall so far off the rails this thread gets nuked! =;

Please.

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:29 pm
by Rundquist
Although in general, the rule about not saying anything if you don’t have anything nice to say, is a good rule to go by on a public forum, people also need to maintain a thick skin on a public forum. CM can definitely have and express his opinions. He didn’t call anyone out specifically. Cheers


Back to the thread topic please.
:mrgreen: :Dietrich:

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:35 pm
by Indiana G
i have said my peace and will not revisit this subject again, sir.

back on the rails:

believe it or not, i would have an expo right now if slydini took a little longer to post pics of his TN 1. rundquists prototype pics had me sold. this was one major jacket offering that has been elusive to my wardrobe. regardless of its inaccuracies.......and these are inaccuracies that are on the 'anal' side........you won't be regretting owning one. i base that on the opinions i have heard from well respected owners.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:43 pm
by Michaelson
Indiana G wrote:i have said my peace and will not revisit this subject again, sir.
Thank you.

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:23 pm
by JC1972
This is my G&B lamb, which I love. I haven't distressed it yet. For almost $500, I feel I should let it come naturally. If it was a Wested or Todd's (if he made a standard one that fit), I'd have no problem beating it up.


http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y170/JimCem99/001.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y170/JimCem99/002.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y170/JimCem99/003.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y170/JimCem99/015.jpg

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:17 pm
by Shagbd
JC,
That thing is beautiful!

see, I wanted a jacket that was pretty accurate, but that was not my main draw to this jacket.
I have heard from several VERY reliable sources that the goatskin Expo is about the toughest Indy jacket you can get.
I happen to also very much like the cut and style of indy jackets, so this will be something i wear daily, not just a costume peice or prop replica.
Same thing with my Fed 4 hat.... its just tough as nails REAL hat...
Same thing with my Aldens, they get WORN.

to me, i guess thats why i think artificial "distressing" is silly....why RUIN a brand new peice of gear?

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:26 pm
by Rundquist
Shagbd wrote:JC,
That thing is beautiful!

see, I wanted a jacket that was pretty accurate, but that was not my main draw to this jacket.
I have heard from several VERY reliable sources that the goatskin Expo is about the toughest Indy jacket you can get.
I happen to also very much like the cut and style of indy jackets, so this will be something i wear daily, not just a costume peice or prop replica.
Same thing with my Fed 4 hat.... its just tough as nails REAL hat...
Same thing with my Aldens, they get WORN.

to me, i guess thats why i think artificial "distressing" is silly....why RUIN a brand new peice of gear?
If that is your criteria, you picked the right jacket (or at least one of the right jackets).

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:46 pm
by Shagbd
SWEET!
Thanks Rund!!

Ill post pics when she arrives....

The weather is actually supposed to start cooling off NEXT WEEK, so its really perfect timing.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:33 pm
by Texas Raider
That jacket sure doesn't look like a G&B! The back panel isn't tapered, the pockets are an odd shape and the stitching on the side straps looks a little off. :?

TR

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:35 pm
by Rundquist
Texas Raider wrote:That jacket sure doesn't look like a G&B! The back panel isn't tapered, the pockets are an odd shape and the stitching on the side straps looks a little off. :?

TR
You’re definitely looking at a forced perspective in those pics. Still I’m not sure that I’m seeing the same things that you’re seeing. Cheers

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:06 am
by Texan Scott
With the G&B goat, you can be 'drug by a truck' all day, and it takes it like a man! ;-) To me, the most SA jacket out there right now is the Todd's jacket, also the most inexpensive. It is very thin to replicate the SU--screen used jacket in Raiders. Thin but tough in its own right as there have been a few who have put it to the test. If you want a heavier jacket and more durability though, the G&B delivers. The made to order G&B fits like a charm.

What will $1,000 Indy bucks get you:
2 G&B's
2 Todd's Customs
3.38 USW Signature Goatskin Adventurers
4.3 Custom Westeds
5 OTR Wested Specials
5 Blue Label USW
6.67 Todd's Standards

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:11 am
by CM
Indiana G wrote:
CM wrote:It's very accurate. Remember many jackets were used in Raiders. This is based on one of them, with a few minor tweaks to make it stronger.

My view has always been I want a jacket like the one in the film only better (ie more functional and better quality)

From what I've seen of the new Tony Nowak Raiders, the G&B is about as accurate as that one. I hear it's as well made too.

It could even be argued that anyone who wants a more accurate jacket than a G&B is clinically insane or just stupidly picky. But it's a free world (or part of it is anyway...) :lol: :-k
it may be argued that i'm insane, but i am far from stupid which is why i resent that remark. this hobby has alot of levels and niches and all of them should be respected by all members of the community. from my understanding of your jacket preference CM, i know that you prefer real world to prop replica and that is what you aim your money at.....but making a comment about how G&B is as accurate as a TN is placed in ignorance in my opinion and you should definitely look past your reinforced stitching and proper zippers and seams to understand that. if i wanted a jacket that would be resilient to the effects of time and to be fashionable forever, i wouldn't pick an indy-style jacket to fit the bill. i enjoy buying indy jackets because i want it as close to the screen jacket as possible....imperfections and all. that is where my enjoyment emanates from. to call it stupid is just plain ignorant.
Man that's twisted... and funny. Thank God you're over it now.

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:38 am
by JC1972
Rundquist wrote:
Texas Raider wrote:That jacket sure doesn't look like a G&B! The back panel isn't tapered, the pockets are an odd shape and the stitching on the side straps looks a little off. :?

TR
You’re definitely looking at a forced perspective in those pics. Still I’m not sure that I’m seeing the same things that you’re seeing. Cheers
TR,
I assure you its a G&B. And I don't see those things either.

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:52 pm
by Texas Raider
I wasn't accusing you a being a liar or anything, my friend, ;-) I was just making an observation aloud. ;-) You're probably right, just forced perception. I tried to take pics of mine that match yours. The differences I see, mainly, are the pockets and the rear panel. The pockets on mine are smaller and less rounded, and the back panel seems a bit more tapered than the one I see on yours. Also, the stitchin is different on the straps. I think it's probably because of different workmanship between jackets, maybe.

[img][img]http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/7443/jacket001il9.th.jpg[/img][/img] [img][url=http://img78.imageshack.us/ ... .jpg[/img][/img][/url]

[img][img]http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/2184/jacket005nw4.th.jpg[/img][/img]

TR

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:54 pm
by Texan Scott
When did you get yours TR?

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:00 pm
by Texas Raider
About 5 years ago.

TR

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:16 pm
by Dr._J
I dig what you're saying about the back panel not being tapered. Look where the back panel meets the top yoke. It's usually met in the corners like Texas Raider's jacket. This one seems to have a U.S. Wings thing going on (where the back panel is shaped like a rectangle) and doesn't meet in the corners. I don't know if that makes sense. Still a great looking jacket!

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:52 pm
by Holt
TR.is that a goatskin?

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:02 pm
by Texan Scott
Looks like it is based on the grain (from a distance) and thickness?

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:40 pm
by JC1972
Mine was only bought in April and hardly worn as you can see. Could that make a difference? Or has G&B changed their style? Or b/c mine is lamb? :-k

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:36 pm
by Texas Raider
Yes, mine is goatskin. JC, I'm having the feeling it's just a difference in personnel that made the jacket. To my awareness, I don't think they have changed their pattern of the jacket, as there was never anything wrong (at all!) with it. I also had another one that I got brand new, and it was pretty much identical to the one you see in my pics, but the color of yours. It too was goat. Maybe you could contact them and see what is up, maybe a replacement is in order (if you are interested in doing so).

TR

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:07 pm
by MFC
JC,

I got mine from G&B a few weeks ago. It's a little hard to tell from your pictures due to the angle, but I think my pocket flaps look just like yours. I think that is just how they are doing them now.

-Matt

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:21 pm
by Texan Scott
Here is an excerpt from an interesting post by Dave Marshall of G&B in another thread:

"I explained that we have had the same leather team for years. When the slow summer months come around, most factories lay off people for lack of work; not us, we are diversified enough that we keep our people busy continuing to make a good salary. We also realize that once you lay off good artisans, you risk not having the talent when the season picks up."

The only other comment I would add is that the difference in taper or no taper and other slight differences might be a custom made jacket versus an OTR G&B jacket. When I first ordered an Expedition, a 44 Short was ordered for the preference in shorter sleeves. However, the torso of the jacket was too short for me and I sent it back in exchange for a made to order. She literally pulled the OTR jacket off the rack and sent it, as it was already made. Taking in the straps slightly will also help with the taper effect.

A customer always has preferences, but I've always believed that someone else, or a few people has/have worried about SA before the product is ever offered for sale, before it ever reaches me. Having access to a stuntman's, screen used jacket from Raiders has to be a great beginning!

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:34 pm
by JC1972
MFC wrote:JC,

I got mine from G&B a few weeks ago. It's a little hard to tell from your pictures due to the angle, but I think my pocket flaps look just like yours. I think that is just how they are doing them now.

-Matt
Thanks Matt.

TR, I'm not going to return it. To me, it looks fine (I'm new to jackets & the whole Indy hobby). And I'm not one to nit-pick. Few more years of this, who knows and I might.

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:31 pm
by CM
I think the G&B's vary a bit. Some pocket flaps are a little more squared off, mine is mega scalloped... Also the pocket on the other side of the windflap is often a little too close to the zip. Mine is just 3 cm instead of the 4-6cm space we see in most screen shots. Other than that (as Indy G knows) I reckon the G&B can't be beat. :notworthy:

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:51 pm
by Shagbd
well I got my size 44R Goat Expedition in today and it is FANTASTIC!

really, all the bragging and stuff said about this jacket doesnt begin to describe it!
Screen accuracy aside,its just a super well built jacket, the Goatskin is really nice and heavy but very supple at the same time with a nice pebble grain to it... its very dark brown...nearly black in some light, buit im sure it will age nicely and only look better with time.

thank you again to Paul @ Midwestwhips for suggesting this one to me!

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:56 pm
by Indiana G
;0

boom baby!!! gotcha :)

lets see it my friend.......if the TN1 didn't come up, that very jacket would probably be in my closet right now :)

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:54 pm
by Texan Scott
Yeah! Post 'em up! What's the deal? :P ;-) :whip:

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:00 am
by Michaelson
Indiana G wrote:......if the TN1 didn't come up, that very jacket would probably be in my closet right now :)
Why? There's nothing saying you can't own both! :lol:

Regard! Michaelson

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:06 pm
by Shagbd
FINALLY we have pictures!!!

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb133/shagbd/gb1.jpg

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb133/shagbd/gb2.jpg

yeh............ it really IS that dark...... almost looks black!

here it is in the sun.... its a perfect fit!

Image

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:02 pm
by Texas Raider
Now, THAT is a Gibson and Barnes, no question. Does everybody see the differences to which I'm referring in the former pictures of that other G&B? This one looks exactly like mine, same pockets, etc, etc. Generally they never differ, that is why I questioned that other one.

Looks great, Shag! Glad you like it,,they really are the best jacket out there, IMO.

TR

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:19 pm
by CM
Shagbd wrote:FINALLY we have pictures!!!

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb133/shagbd/gb1.jpg

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb133/shagbd/gb2.jpg

yeh............ it really IS that dark...... almost looks black!

here it is in the sun.... its a perfect fit!

Image
EDIT - I got this wrong. Forget I was here...

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:30 pm
by Texas Raider
That one is fine, that's the way they are made and supposed to be. I'm sure the other side matches.

TR

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:10 pm
by Holt
wow.your face man...Im sorry...what happend? ;-)



LOVE the jacket.I am a 44 too.whats the backlength,sleeves and across chest measurements??

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:22 pm
by Texan Scott
SA! Didn't Indy wear a smiley face in all the movies?


...he does after receiving a new G&B jacket! ;-)

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:59 pm
by Shagbd
anybody else notice the Aldens and Morgan whip?