Page 1 of 1
Someone else's dirty work (predistressing)
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:49 pm
by binkmeisterRick
Why predistress your jacket when you can get one that was predistressed by someone else? Many folks know that I generally prefer to let my gear distress naturally just by wearing it. I own a Wested goatskin which I've had for three years. It's wrinkled and broken in very nicely, but still looks "new" since I treat it with Pecards twice a year. That said, I don't baby that jacket in the least.
I always thought it would be cool to have one Indy jacket that
looked like it had been through countless adventures and back, but I'd never be one to artificially distress my own jacket. I just can't bring myself to do it. Well, it just so happened that Rick5150 had an authentic lamb Wested which he predistressed himself, but had shrunk a bit much for him because he, uh, has a habit of shrinking jackets.
The measurements looked right and the price was even better, so he was kind enough to send the jacket my way.
Just to get the specs out of the way, this is how it was ordered back in 2003:
Size: 38/Slim
Leather: Authentic Lambskin
Lining: Cotton
Hardware: Brass “D: rings, Brass Zip (RH pull)
Sleeve length: 24-¼” 11 ½” circumference maximum
Back info: Tapered back panel and standard 24” length
Inside Pocket: Unlined w/nylon zipper
Extras:
Gussets
Adjust front to prevent the “ride-up”
I really like how this jacket feels and looks. He did a great job distressing it. The only thing I'm a little uncertain on is the sleeve length. In the front comparison pic, the left side shows the sleeve length as it is. The right side shows the sleeves shortened a little. I like it both ways for different reasons, though opinions on this would be appreciated. The pictures were taken next to natural window light. On with the pics! (And for reference, the fedora is a vintage Dobbs that Steve brought back to life, pre-AB.
)
Front with jacket open. Regular sleeve length on left, shortened sleeves and drowsy expression on right.
Zipped.
Back (unzipped in front).
From the side with gusset visible.
If I could get a good outside shot, you'd be able to see a lot more of the subtlties.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:13 pm
by indy89
That jacket looks good, bink. Also, nice hat!
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:03 pm
by Indiana G
that looks like a very well loved jacket. good catch!
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:41 pm
by McFly
Hey! Trader Joe's!
Oh... nice jacket... *mumble* Peter... *mumble* Michaelson *mumble* hahaa... do you remember when... *mumble* very ToD *mumble* ...VP... *mumble* definitely shorter.
So basically... the answer to your question is: oblique.
Hope that helped.
In Christ,
Shane
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:46 pm
by binkmeisterRick
IndyMcFly wrote:Hey! Trader Joe's!
Glad you noticed the jacket, McFly!
It does look like a well loved jacket, which is one of the things I love about it.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:38 am
by Strider
Sure is looking good, Bink! Congratulations, I'm envious!
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:56 am
by Technonut
Very nice.... Looks good on you.
Personally, I like the looks of the longer sleeves..
Nice lid too....
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:07 am
by Indiana Jerry
I really like the job he did on the back...simple, understated. Fits you well, too. Good choice, Bink!
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:36 am
by McFly
Glad to be of service, Bink!
I agree with Curly - the back does look good. But I think the shorter sleeves... I think they look less stretched.
In Christ,
Shane
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:28 am
by Jorenz
Hey Bink, When I cross my eyes and look at the first pic (side by side)you look 3D.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:57 am
by Kt Templar
That looks great, (darn I should have snapped that one up!).
One bad ##### beat up looking jacket.
I like the the shorter sleeves.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:59 am
by djd
Looks good. I like it!
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:13 am
by Michaelson
Well, put MY vote in for the longer sleeves.
Sure, the short one's look great when your arms are at your side, but bend your arms or reach out like you're going to be reaching for the wheel of your car, and those cuffs will be a good 4 inches above your wrist.
Long is the way to go, Bink.
Regards! Michaelson
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:29 am
by Swindiana
NICE jacket!
I'd go for the longer sleeves too. My goat is about the same sleeve length on me -jacket open, though zipped all the way up they ride up a bit from the jacket being tighter over the shoulders.
How about shortening one of them to please everyone?
Regards,
Swindiana
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:30 am
by Dr.Seuss
Michaelson wrote:Well, put MY vote in for the longer sleeves. Long is the way to go, Bink.
Longer is better. (From someone with a chronic case of short sleeves.)
Sincerely,
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:38 am
by Michaelson
Dr.Seuss wrote: (From someone with a chronic case of short sleeves.)
Sincerely,
We're members of the same lodge, my friend.
Regards! Michaelson
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:57 am
by binkmeisterRick
Thanks for the compliments, guys. My goatskin Wested has shorter sleeves, so I may leave these longer for the variety. The sleeve length when I raise my arms, etc., is likely the reason I'll leave them. Even so, all I'd need to do is roll the sleeves in a little if I wanted to shorten them. No need to go to a tailor since they stay put just fine for me.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:47 pm
by VP
IndyMcFly wrote:Oh... nice jacket... *mumble* Peter... *mumble* Michaelson *mumble* hahaa... do you remember when... *mumble* very ToD *mumble* ...VP... *mumble* definitely shorter.
So I now have the same member status as Peter and Michaelson?
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:54 pm
by binkmeisterRick
VP wrote:IndyMcFly wrote:Oh... nice jacket... *mumble* Peter... *mumble* Michaelson *mumble* hahaa... do you remember when... *mumble* very ToD *mumble* ...VP... *mumble* definitely shorter.
So I now have the same member status as Peter and Michaelson?
No, he just put you on the same, uh, list. 8-[
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:17 pm
by Michaelson
...I have a feeling it's not a good list either, VP!
Regards! Michaelson
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:26 pm
by Dr.Seuss
Far better than being placed on the "short sleeve list."
Michaelson, nice having you as a comrade at arms (long arms, that is).
Sincerely,
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:30 pm
by McFly
Michaelson wrote:...I have a feeling it's not a good list either, VP!
Regards! Michaelson
He
was mentioned right after "ToD" so take that as you will.
I voted for short sleeves cuz (that thar's gruduate spellin') the sleeves on my Auth. Lamb are short like that. Actually probably a little longer but closer to that than the long sleeves.
In Christ,
Shane
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:39 am
by Indiana Jerry
Yeah, monkey arms checking in. Too short can't be fixed...too long can be wrinkled with time (or other tricks) or even tailored. So far I've never had a jacket with sleeves too long, though.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:58 am
by IndianaGuybrush
I've got freakishly long arms for my body size too, or at least thats what I have to conclude based on the availability of pre-fab jackets in my size. I also go for length on the sleeves. Remember, it's easier to take some away than it is to add some on.
Besides, if you look at the films the long sleeve look is more SA.
The jacket looks great Bink. I'm a big fan of natural distressing but I definitely see the merit of having one of each. A well distressed jacket just has an edge over one that still looks shiny and new. You lucked out buddy, heck of a nice catch.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:37 pm
by binkmeisterRick
Rick5150 did an outstanding job on his predistressing of this jacket. I've seen a number of jackets that look like someone took sandpaper to them, but this is one of the best jobs I've seen. I have a vintage horsehide jacket from the '40s which is naturally distressed from years of wear, and Rick's job looks just as true in his artifical ageing of this jacket. There are a lot of subtleties which simply don't show on screen.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:38 pm
by Michaelson
Thing about rick5150 is most of HIS jackets come with REAL distressing jobs from him falling off that dang mountain he likes to climb.
Regards! Michaelson
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:40 pm
by binkmeisterRick
True. And this one was caught in a downpour, to boot! So I guess as far as distressing goes, his jackets are really 50/50 then, huh?
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:41 pm
by rick5150
Michaelson wrote:Thing about rick5150 is most of HIS jackets come with REAL distressing jobs from him falling off that dang mountain he likes to climb.
Regards! Michaelson
Just for the record, I don't fall
all the way off. In fact, I just bagged another one this weekend (Mt. Cabot) and I did not fall until the very top. Dead serious. Just when I saw the marker that marked the peak, I tripped over a root and went down to my knees. :evil:
binkmeisterRick wrote:Rick5150 did an outstanding job on his predistressing of this jacket. I've seen a number of jackets that look like someone took sandpaper to them, but this is one of the best jobs I've seen. I have a vintage horsehide jacket from the '40s which is naturally distressed from years of wear, and Rick's job looks just as true in his artifical ageing of this jacket. There are a lot of subtleties which simply don't show on screen.
Thank you for that. I never took sandpaper to that jacket for the record. I learned from my goatskin that might not be a great idea.
Especially for someone who uses shoe & boot oil on the jacket. The scuffed spots you get with sandpaper really darken and look awful when oiled.
Normally when I get a jacket, I wipe it with alcohol to kill the shine. A while later I will lightly acetone the seams. Not to remove all the color, but just to lighten them ever so slightly in certain spots. A short time later, I lightly wipe the jacket in key areas with acetone. Again, just removing a little bit of color. You can always remove more later.
Of course, all the while, it gets worn in between. It may get scratched up when I am bushwhacking a trail (or when I fall off mountains), or it may get wet. But that is three years or so of natural distressing as well as the artificial distressing. The natural distressing at the bottom of the back panel looks less realistic than the artificial distressing to me.
I had over 20 different jackets and have cut my collection down significantly, but still have a rotating stock of 10 at any given time. Get rid of a few to get a few more. (I am having a custom jacket made by Vanson Leathers that the
House, M.D. fans will appreciate.)
To wait for each to distress naturally would take a lot longer than I figure I have left.. but I am glad you like it and it looks great on you. It is good to see it being worn again.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:44 pm
by binkmeisterRick
Thank YOU, Rick! I'm really enjoying this jacket!
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:46 pm
by Michaelson
rick5150 wrote:Just for the record, I don't fall all the way off. In fact, I just bagged another one this weekend (Mt. Cabot) and I did not fall until the very top. Dead serious. Just when I saw the marker that marked the peak, I tripped over a root and went down to my knees. :evil:
See, he does it to the REST of his gear TOO!!
Regards! Michaelson
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:01 pm
by rick5150
Not to mention my knees. NH is called the Granite State for a reason.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:01 pm
by Indiana Jerry
Rick, wasn't it you who also stated sometime you'll bunch up the arms, at least bend at the elbow to make those nice wrinkles, then just wipe across the top of them w/ acetone? A simple trick, but a clever one.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:15 pm
by Canyon
binkmeisterRick wrote:Thank YOU, Rick! I'm really enjoying this jacket!
And it looks so good on you as well.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:19 pm
by binkmeisterRick
Thanks, Canyon. I'm Rick5150 shrunk in the wash.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:40 pm
by rick5150
Indiana Jerry wrote:Rick, wasn't it you who also stated sometime you'll bunch up the arms, at least bend at the elbow to make those nice wrinkles, then just wipe across the top of them w/ acetone? A simple trick, but a clever one.
Yes, that is part of my distressing as well. You have a great memory. Of course, the problem is that it only works on jackets that allow you to bunch the sleeves up to the elbows. Most of the latest Indy jackets I have are too tight in the sleeve to allow this. I think you can see this effect quite clearly in bink's pictures - especially his right sleeve.
Then again, as the warmer weather comes, I push the sleeves up and wear the jacket that way. I like the look.
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:17 am
by IndyTaz
Wow!!! i love that look on you Bink....ahem, I mean from one guy to another looks great. Looks very natural. I like long sleeves too.
Acetone huh? Rick...do you oild or bootpolish them as well after the acetone treatments? I am thinking of doing that to my lamb. Have you written an in depth tutorial b4? Consider doing it now? LOL
Regards
TAZ
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:24 am
by binkmeisterRick
Uh, thanks, Taz. I think. 8-[
I think I'm going to stick with leaving the sleeves longer as it currently is. I like not having the cuff halfway up my arm when I raise my arms. I just wish it weren't in the 80's and 90's out... oh, heck, Harry did it, right?