Leather Facings

Discuss all of the intricacies of the jacket in full detail

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg

Post Reply
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Leather Facings

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

Hi all,

For my first Indy Wested, I had inner facings on the jacket. For my second, I had it without any.

Now, I really much prefer the overall drape of the second jacket, and also how much more comfortable it is without facings. Considering that I seldom use the zipper, it also makes ripping the lining (the main reason for the facing) obsolete.

That, and the fact that the movie just looks much more 'authentic' w/o facings, since it basically just stiffens the whole front.

And finally, yes there is a point to this post: Is there a way to remove the leather facings after the fact? Or would it be much better to simply buy another one instead...?

Thanks!
User avatar
Indiana G
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3918
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: in the Temple of Insanity

Post by Indiana G »

i sent that question out to wested months ago and never got a reply. i really liked my goatskin jacket but hated the leather facings. perhaps your tailor can give you a faster response.
User avatar
indy89
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1254
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: TX

Post by indy89 »

I like the leather facings in my Wings, but now that I know that there not SA I kindda wish they weren't there.
Oh well.

Nevermind, I like the facings.
Lao Feng
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 8:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in the Past

Post by Lao Feng »

I like the facings...I wish G & B used them...they make a real difference in protecting your jacket if you really knock the heck out of it out there in the "real world."
CM
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by CM »

Yeah, I like the facings too. Why wear a toy jacket for a film set when you can wear a real one for life? Besides... if the drape is that important, you need to go out and obtain Harrison Ford's shoulders and chest too.

Cheers - CM
User avatar
djd
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1272
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:52 am
Location: Tranquility Base

Post by djd »

I guess it depends on what you want I guess. For me, I want a SA jacket. I have other leather jackets that I like to wear but I want an Indy jacket to look as much like an Indy jacket as possible. If I didn't I'd join a flight jackets group or something. That's why I'm here....
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

After having an authentic lamb with facings, and one without facings, I can honestly say that leather facings are best left to those who throw themselves off cliffs.

What that means is that unless you're going to take your jacket to some extreme sport situation (mountain climbing, hardcore bike racing, etc) where your jacket is at peril, I would go without facings. Also, if you WERE to get into a situation where your jacket is going to get scrapped badly, leather facings should be the last of your worries! ;)

I personally find that the only real downside to not having leather facings is the zipper- I'm told (and I don't doubt) that occasionally you might get your jacket lining trapped in the zip. However, if you're careful, this shouldn't be an issue. Another thing is the wavy zippers that supposedly occur over time, but with both owners of facings and those without reporting it happening to them, what causes the waviness seems to be up in the air.

The one main difference that I find differentiates jackets with facings and those without is just the stiffness that accompanies it. Screen-accuracy not withstanding, I strongly believe that going WITHOUT leather facings makes for a much for flattering jacket. When you have leather facings, it just makes the front super-stiff, and add to the fact that the pockets add a degree of stiffness to the front of the jacket, you'll wind up with a jacket that tends to flare outwards at the waist. The end result is a bell-shaped reverse-taper to the jacket.

Going without leather facings just seem to make the jacket drape closer to the body in a more complimentary manner. And if you trust yourself not to get your clothes stuck in the zipper, then you should be fine. Besides, if you're worried about having your liner stuck in the zipper, think about it this way: how many times have you gotten your shirt stuck in the zipper? Or certain other things for that matter... :shock: ;)

Just an observation I made.
Last edited by Castor Dioscuri on Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

I personally find that the only real downside to having leather facings is the zipper- I'm told (and I don't doubt) that occasionally you might get your jacket lining trapped in the zip.
I think you meant 'the only real down side to NOT having leather facings et.al......"

If you have facings, you DON"T get your lining trapped in the zip, nor are you prone to wavy zippers.

Regards! Michaelson
User avatar
Garzo
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:49 am
Location: Berlin

Post by Garzo »

I think Wested has done away with the leather faces. I received a horsehide jacket last year and it came with leather facings. I recently ordered a new lamb jacket and, without specifying anything about the facings, it arrived without them.
I hadn't thought much about it and appreciate the leather facings for the extra toughness, but the new jacket does drape quite nicely without the extra leather, while the horsehide is a bit stiffer (although it is horsehide).

Is it a fact that Wested has stopped adding the leather facings, or was it for some reason that I don't know about simply left off my jacket?
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

Michaelson wrote:If you have facings, you DON"T get your lining trapped in the zip, nor are you prone to wavy zippers.
Thanks for the correction about the lining and the zip, Michaelson, BUT your second part... Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a wavy zipper also known as a 'Demon Roll'? And if so, I quote:
Michaelson wrote:The 'demon roll' seems to appear, regardless of the presense or absense of facing to the zipper.
viewtopic.php?t=17714 ;)

And to Garzo, I must also add that I recieved my jacket (with facings) on March of this year. Maybe if you don't specify facings or no facings, it's a crapshoot as to what you'll get?

Speaking of facings though, I wonder if you request facings of 1/2" to 1", will act as a compromise by making the jacket "drapey", while at the same time keeping the liner away from the zip?
User avatar
indy89
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1254
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: TX

Post by indy89 »

indy89 wrote:Nevermind, I like the facings.
Forget what I said earlier. I don't care for the facings either [-(
ANZAC_1915
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 864
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA

Post by ANZAC_1915 »

I got facings (on new Wested) and had asked for them.

I like them. Peter thinks they're better for everyday use --- on the drape comments, hard for me to tell without a faceless jacket to compare. Front looks great on me. The back, not so much.
User avatar
VP
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3812
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 3:14 am
Location: Espoo, Finland
Contact:

Post by VP »

Castor Dioscuri wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a wavy zipper also known as a 'Demon Roll'?
No, Demon Roll is when the other side of the jacket turns on itself, http://indygear.com/cow/viewtopic.php?p=259037#259037
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Thanks VP. I've been away from the site.

VP's right. It's a different problem all together.

Regards! Michaelson
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

I stand corrected! Thanks for clarifying that, I always had those two terms confused.
User avatar
J_Weaver
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2149
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:18 pm
Location: Ramparts of Civilization

Post by J_Weaver »

I personally don't like the facings and will never own another Indy jacket with them. If Peter says the make a difference them I'm sure they do. However, I've got an A-2 that came into the family almost 40 years ago. It doesn't have a facing and the liner is worn in a few places, but along the zipper isn't one of them.

The facings effect and not for the better IMHO, the drape of the jacket.
Post Reply