Page 1 of 1
Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:57 pm
by Lightning
I picked up a pair of accurate Colmont binoculars off e-bay for $5. It's in great shape mechanically, it just needed a lot of cleaning, and all the leather needs to be replaced. Without further delay here are the pictures.
with the leather still on
https://webspace.utexas.edu/gatesrr/www/Binoc1.jpg
leather removed
https://webspace.utexas.edu/gatesrr/www/Binoc2.jpg
took me 4 hours (and 2 socks) to get to this
https://webspace.utexas.edu/gatesrr/www/Binoc4.jpg
Colmont FT Paris
https://webspace.utexas.edu/gatesrr/www/Binoc3.jpg
I need to use the Dremil tool to clean the rings on the front
https://webspace.utexas.edu/gatesrr/www/Binoc5.jpg
It's staying like this untill I can make replacement leather pieces
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:09 pm
by IndianaRedmon
Great find lightening. Please post some pictures when you have them restored.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:50 pm
by ShanghaiJack
Nice find, but imho it's a shame that you removed the leather and polished them. I thought they had a lovely patina, but to each his own. I might have to see if I can find a pair. Thanks for posting the pics.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:59 pm
by whipwarrior
Stanley London offers a contemporary reproduction of this type of binocular, if anyone is interested:
http://www.stanleylondon.com/largebinoc.htm
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:22 am
by Lightning
ShanghaiJack wrote:Nice find, but imho it's a shame that you removed the leather and polished them. I thought they had a lovely patina, but to each his own. I might have to see if I can find a pair. Thanks for posting the pics.
I would have left them alone if the leather was in better shape, but one side was badly ripped and both were ready to fall off. Since I plan to replace the leather I though it would be prudent to clean them. I don't have a problem with patinaed brass in general, but personally, I think letting brass turn bright green is letting it go too far. The leather I removed is nearly solid green on the inside and I don't want the new leather to end up in a simmilar situation. I do however, understand where you are coming from. I've got a couple of brass P.O. boxes that I left patina on, but they had not progressed to the green stage yet.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:20 am
by ShanghaiJack
Ah, well I understand in that case. I'm looking forward to pics of the restored binocs.
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:18 am
by Hemingway Jones
Interesting project. I'm sure they'll look great once you restore them. Do these binoculars work?
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:04 am
by Lightning
You bet they work. They look to be about 4X to me. Since they don't have the capability to change width to match different eye spacing it takes a little getting used to, but once you get the hang of it they work great.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:09 am
by VP
Are they LC accurate?
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:36 am
by K on the run
VP wrote:Are they LC accurate?
They could be, looks pretty close to me, it's hard to tell the size of Lightnings Binoculars.
I captured two more stills and tried to lighten them some in PhotoShop.
-K
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:12 am
by Lightning
I think they are the right size. I'll post a picture of me holding them in a couple of days.
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:47 am
by VP
Well?
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:09 pm
by Lightning
Ok, it's been 5 months, Sorry about that.
Anyway:
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:45 pm
by J_Weaver
They look screen accurate to me. Great find!
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:24 pm
by Hemingway Jones
Nice match up shots, lightening; maybe the best I've ever seen.
Those are a great find.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:18 am
by VP
Looking good. Yours look a bit longer in the third pic tho.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 1:09 pm
by Lightning
Hemingway: Thanks, I appreciate that.
VP: I think the size difference in the 3rd picture is a combination of the fact that mine is a close up shot and the original is taken from a distance, and that I have narrower fingers than Harrison Ford so that I can never cover as much space on the body as him.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:40 pm
by Redinight
Hmm, I have had a pair of these sitting behind my dad's bar for as long as I can remember, they belonged to my great grandfather. I'll have to see if they are the same brand/model when I get home.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:05 am
by Texas Raider
Great find! It looks as though the eyepieces are slightly larger on yours.
TR
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:05 pm
by Erri
A bit of an old thread but I thought it was better not to start another one and continue from here.
What do you think of this one? It was on ebay (auction ended already), dated 1914 and described as "1914 WAR FIELD GLASSES IN CASE CROWS FOOT - GREAT WAR GOVERNMENT ISSUE CROWS FOOT / BROAD ARROW FIELD GLASSES 6 INCH ONE EXTENDING SHIELD MISSING"
How do you think it compares with the binoculars from LC?
PS check out also the buckle on the strap
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:34 am
by Mac
That's very close, Erri. Lightning's is spot on...except for the leather, or lack thereof, now.
That one looks like a variation, later or earlier, of Lightning's model. Is it a Colmont as well?
Is it yours now?
If so, then good find! And let's see some pics of the buckle.
- Mac
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:04 am
by Erri
No I was only following the auction. I decided not to bid because it had a broken lens and in my opinion it's best not to buy binoculars unless the lens are still intact. So, sorry no more pictures than that. It ended for around £20 by the way
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:52 pm
by DanielJones
Man, I had to go check my living room. I thought you may have taken them from there. I have a pair exactly like that one. Go figure.
Cheers!
Dan
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:20 pm
by RaiderZee
Lightning, could you provide the length of each section of the binoculars? Also, can you post/post a link to the movie screen caps in larger size?
Good work!
RaiderZee
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:53 am
by Erri
DanielJones wrote:Man, I had to go check my living room. I thought you may have taken them from there. I have a pair exactly like that one. Go figure.
Cheers!
Dan
Please feel free to post some pictures ;-)
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:06 am
by McHale
good binoculars guys! I love the old look...
congratulations guys!
bests
Mc. ;-)
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:26 pm
by Indiana Citroen
hey lightning
well thanks to your post...lookie what I got on fleabay
http://s460.photobucket.com/albums/qq322/stuartdammery/
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:37 pm
by Erri
they look very good!!
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:28 am
by Imahomer
Not the best photo, but from what I can tell it looks pretty good.
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:45 am
by enigmata_wood
Very nice. I am attracted to old technology, it has a utilitarian beauty to it and it is usually sturdy and functional.
I have resisted buying old 'Bin's because the spherical aberation in old lenses can be bad. How good are the lenses in this pair?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:15 pm
by Indiana Citroen
as far as I can tell they are a perfect match....
They do work but ....well they are almost 100 years old so you guess how good they are, no night vision.
The case is in good shape, the strap is broken, and i might fix that later.
At the moment Im distressing my Mark bag
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:29 am
by enigmata_wood
Indiana Citroen wrote:They do work but ....well they are almost 100 years old so you guess how good they are, no night vision.
here's an 'old technology' tip for night vision. wear yellow tinted glasses at dusk, it won't work in absolute darkness but favours your eyes' preference for reacting to sunlight. It also filters out bright white light that ruins your natural night vision.
If the objective lense of your bins (the one furthest from your eyes) is above 1" in. [25mm] in diameter it may gather enough light that a yellow filter will improve your differentiation of detail.
It may give you a head start spotting those pesky Nazis or supernatural beings that threaten all Indyesque activities!
Enigmata
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:42 am
by Erri
If I may add a picture of mine, this is my contribute to the thread. My freshly purchased military-issued British binoculars from 1910's
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:01 am
by binkmeisterRick
Erri, you don't need binoculars to read the forums, just get a regular pair of glasses!
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:25 am
by Erri
I have to say, it's quite a funny picture now that I look at it... I should have expected a reply from Bink
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:54 am
by binkmeisterRick
It
is a funny picture. It kind of creeps me out a little, though. You look like a voyeur! Stop looking at me!!!
It's a neat set of binoculars, though.
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:31 am
by Erri
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:59 am
by GeordieIndy
I've been looking for some of these for a while and have seen different sizes available on the net...
Lightning, do you mind if I ask what the dimensions of the binoculars you have are, and what size the lens diameter is?
Thanks,
GeordieIndy
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:51 pm
by Lightning
diameter of the lens housings is 2.5 inches. lenses themselves look to be 2 inches. the length of the binoculars fully closed is 6 3/16 inches. never have figured out how to recover these things with leather.
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:09 pm
by GeordieIndy
Thanks for the info! I thought I had found some that were accurate, unfortunately they are smaller and a little different.
GeordieIndy
Re: Binoculars! (now with comparison pictures)
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:34 am
by Indiana MarkVII
I've had this pair, which look pretty much the same, ever since the pre-release photos came out for CS. After taking this quick shot just a few minutes ago, I see that my tape measure is not so accurate.