Page 1 of 1
need your help to choose my bagstrap and buckle
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 5:37 am
by bastoon
Hi everybody,
I plan to buy at TAG a new bagstrap and Tod buckle to replace the originale bagstrap of my MK6.
But i don't know which is the most appropriate : with or without border grooves ? And what about the size ? 65" or 72" ? I'm not tall : 1,76 m
I want it to be more screen accurate. I will be glad to read your opinion !
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 5:42 am
by JAN
I´d say : No groves, and pick the 65" - You´ll stumple in a longer strap.
Best regards
JAN
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:39 am
by Indiana_Tom
Bastoon, it depends on what style you prefer. If you're a Raiders guy, take the border grooves and the Raiders buckle (highly recommended; I own one).
If you're a Temple/Crusade-Fan, go without border grooves and take the Temple buckle.
But you can also combine the offered styles. Anyway, you'll be pleased with Richard's products.
BTW, take the 65" strap.
Regards,
Tom
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:03 am
by bastoon
thank you very much for your advise.
To be or not to be Raider or Tod ? That is the question !!!!
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:21 am
by Erri
Do you have any pic of that poor lovely web strap?
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:24 am
by bastoon
this is my fault
i hate space travel
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:58 am
by Erri
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:03 am
by Neolithic
Definately go with the 65 strap- I'm about the same height as you and have both lengths- the 65 is a lot better on me.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:42 am
by VP
Is there a length that if you're over it you should get a 72" and if you're under it you should get a 65"?
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:56 am
by Swindiana
I'd say get a 72" and then cut it to fit exactly where you want it to hang and the buckle to be placed. They are the same price, right?
I know for sure that a 72" would be to short for me, even though recommended for a certain hight and above.
Just what I would do.
Regards,
Swindiana
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:49 am
by bastoon
Hi everybody,
Before i place my order to TAG i would like to know one thing : I'm not a "manual guy" you know... so : Is the buckle already attached to the strap ? or i will have to attach all things ? I just watched the tuto and it look like the buckle is attached to the strap...
By the way, am i an heretic if i choose raider strap and temple buckle ?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:50 am
by Erri
I'm not a manual guy aswell but i menaged to put the buckle on! Anyway i think there is a tutorial somewhere, i think it's on indygear.com in the Bag session
bastoon wrote:
By the way, am i an heretic if i choose raider strap and temple buckle ?
Not at all!!! Expecially if you have a wonderful ToD bag
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:49 am
by IndyTaz
Mmm I'm in the same place as Bastoon...I think this thread has solved what buckle "Raiders" and strap "with grooves" for my MK VII.
I'm 1.89cm... is the 65' still the best if you want the buckle in the middle of your chest?
Yeah I know...but I had to ask
Regards
IndyTaz
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:51 am
by Erri
Quite tall arent you taz? I didnt know you use the metrical system in Australia.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:55 am
by IndyTaz
Tall? I suppose. They make us big down here
Yeah we did use the imperial sytem at one stage but now we are metric. Well...ever since I've been around anyway. Did the AB dry out ok?
TAZ
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:01 am
by Erri
IndyTaz wrote: Tall? I suppose. They make us big down here
Yeah we did use the imperial sytem at one stage but now we are metric. Well...ever since I've been around anyway. Did the AB dry out ok?
TAZ
Good for you now you have the metrical system.
I'll post about my hat right now
in the proper topic
Sorry if i cant help you two with the lenght of the bag strap... i have one but it was a gift so... i didn't order anything peculiar nor i asked for anything peculiar, i just needed a strap!
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:02 am
by Swindiana
Taz;
I'm 192.5cm myself, and the 65 version is way to short on me, and the 72 aswell. Both my straps are custom ordered from a leather shop actually.
I'd go for the 72, for sure.
Regards,
Swindiana
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:17 am
by VP
IndyTaz wrote:I'm 1.89cm
That's about ¾ inches.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:22 am
by Dre
Swindiana: how much did it cost you to get a strap made by a leather shop?
i'd like to get a leather strap...but i havent found an alternative to buying it from tpg or wpg or whatever they are. the cost of the straps + postage are just too much to me for a leather strap
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:55 am
by IndyTaz
Swindiana: Cheers mate
VP:
1 metre and 89cm ok? You?
TAZ
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 5:42 am
by Erri
VP wrote:IndyTaz wrote:I'm 1.89cm
That's about ¾ inches.
I thought in Finland you used the metrical system dont you?
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 5:44 am
by Swindiana
Dre wrote:Swindiana: how much did it cost you to get a strap made by a leather shop?
I think the strap itself was around $12 or so, plus shipping in my case. It was made locally in Sweden and I just asked for it to be 1 inch wide, as dark brown as possible and long enough for my needs. If you have a saddle maker near by, or a leather shop you can think of that may be able to help you out you can get it pretty cheap if the shipping costs are cut out. I'd try the yellow pages.
Regards,
Swindiana
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:12 am
by Dre
ah k...thanks for the advice swindiana =)
if i can find a strap here that's as cheap as that it should be alright...maybe ill look now for some saddle makers n email around
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 8:35 am
by bastoon
swindiana write :
the strap itself was around $12 or so, plus shipping in my case.
i think i'm gonna search once more for a local alternative
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:03 am
by VP
erri_wan wrote:I thought in Finland you used the metrical system dont you?
Indeed we do. I'm 188 cm.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:26 am
by Bufflehead Jones
VP wrote:IndyTaz wrote:I'm 1.89cm
That's about ¾ inches.
Thanks VP. We don't use the metric system here in the US, but at least I thought that I knew how it works. That one confused me and I was about to run and get a metric measuring tape to try and figure out how tall he was.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:15 pm
by Indiana Jerry
Bufflehead Jones wrote:VP wrote:IndyTaz wrote:I'm 1.89cm
That's about ¾ inches.
Thanks VP. We don't use the metric system here in the US, but at least I thought that I knew how it works. That one confused me and I was about to run and get a metric measuring tape to try and figure out how tall he was.
This IndyTaz is actual size :arrow: :junior:
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:16 pm
by Bufflehead Jones
Jerry, that's what I thought. Now, I can see how one would get lost in the outback.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:49 pm
by Indiana Jerry
Heck, even that measuring tape would look like the big boulder...
:arrow: :junior:
...look out, IndyTaz!!!
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:31 pm
by Mojave Jack
VP wrote:erri_wan wrote:I thought in Finland you used the metrical system dont you?
Indeed we do. I'm 188 cm.
I prefer to measure everything in Standard Popsicle Sticks. So VP, you are 16.4 Popsicle Sticks tall, and IndyTaz, apparently you are only .16 Popsicle Sticks tall. Note that that is the
not the Imperial Popsicle Stick, which is quite different. Only the
British still insist on using the Imperial Popsicle Stick.
I, myself, am fully 17.1 Popsicle Sticks tall.
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:58 pm
by Serial Hero
This IndyTaz is actual size
maybe the 65mm strap would work better for him
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:06 pm
by Erri
Mojave Jack wrote:VP wrote:erri_wan wrote:I thought in Finland you used the metrical system dont you?
Indeed we do. I'm 188 cm.
I prefer to measure everything in Standard Popsicle Sticks. So VP, you are 16.4 Popsicle Sticks tall, and IndyTaz, apparently you are only .16 Popsicle Sticks tall. Note that that is the
not the Imperial Popsicle Stick, which is quite different. Only the
British still insist on using the Imperial Popsicle Stick.
I, myself, am fully 17.1 Popsicle Sticks tall.
i wonder how many stones you are then
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:57 pm
by Mojave Jack
erri_wan wrote:Mojave Jack wrote:VP wrote:erri_wan wrote:I thought in Finland you used the metrical system dont you?
Indeed we do. I'm 188 cm.
I prefer to measure everything in Standard Popsicle Sticks. So VP, you are 16.4 Popsicle Sticks tall, and IndyTaz, apparently you are only .16 Popsicle Sticks tall. Note that that is the
not the Imperial Popsicle Stick, which is quite different. Only the
British still insist on using the Imperial Popsicle Stick.
I, myself, am fully 17.1 Popsicle Sticks tall.
i wonder how many stones you are then
Well, in these parts we measure everything using the
Kidney Stone.
I weigh in at a healthy 19,134.285714285714285714285714286 Kidney Stones, but I just round that off to 19,134 Kidney Stones. Using that old archaic British measurement, the plain old regular Stone, I come in at 13.21 Stones.
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:58 pm
by Michaelson
And so, how many swallows would it take to carry you aloft?
Regards! Michaelson
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 6:42 pm
by Mojave Jack
Michaelson wrote:And so, how many swallows would it take to carry you aloft?
Regards! Michaelson
Do you mean African or European?
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 4:45 am
by Swindiana
Not a very common type of post by me, but I just had to.
High regards,
Swindiana
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:01 am
by IndyTaz
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 8:02 am
by VP
Well I'm probably a bit younger than you.
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 8:23 am
by IndyTaz
Yes... I bet you are VP...I turn 32 on Oct the 3rd...yippee and still kicking
Life just gets better and better
TAZ
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:08 am
by bastoon
i 've try to search for a TAG alternative near where i live : us stock army, shoe manufacture, bag for women shop, etc...
Nobody had be able to help me... So i definitly order to TAG...
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:10 am
by Indiana Jerry
OUCH...if you didn't already order it, Bastoon, I hate to be the one to break this to you...go check it out yourself.
viewtopic.php?t=14071&highlight=texas+action+gear
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:14 am
by VP