Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:27 pm
by Bufflehead Jones
binkmeisterRick wrote:Bufflehead, I thought the reason you were singing soprano was because of what the wife did to you after your last purchase! :wink:
Oh, no. But that is the reason that I am temporarily sleeping out on the deck. #-o

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:10 pm
by independent
deck of your 5 million dollar yacht? :wink:

And here's a pic I stole from another thread (sorry), where you can see the pants are saggy, but worn a few inches below his natural waistline:

Image

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 5:34 am
by PLATON
Image

and here is a photo where you can see that the pants are not low rise and not tapered.

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:43 am
by Bufflehead Jones
milesfides wrote:deck of your 5 million dollar yacht? :wink:
I wish!

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:38 am
by Kt Templar
PLATON wrote:Image

and here is a photo where you can see that the pants are not low rise and not tapered.
Ohh! Where do I sign up for some Indy bell bottoms! 8) :lol:

Look at the perspective in that shot Platon wide at the botton narrow at the top because it was taken from very low angle. Not a good example.

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:36 pm
by independent
I'm not so sure. Those pants are still on the hips to me. The natural waist is significantly higher:

"Natural Waist: Bend to one side - the natural crease that appears is your waist."

For most people, this is going to be above the belly button. In that pic, I would imagine harry's belly button to be right where the whip crosses his shirt placket.

I don't know, it looks clear to me those pants are worn on his hips, even with the angled shot.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:59 am
by independent
Platon, any word on those pants from Wested?

Peter: are you offering the pants in regular rise, or do you plan on doing so?

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:23 pm
by PLATON
I sent PM to Peter but no reply yet.
I will send email and will see.

Meantime, I found some very good screen caps showing how the pants should be. Unfo, my other PC is fried and I need to get them out of the hard disk.

Will do so soon and will post them here.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:47 pm
by agent5
I sent PM to Peter but no reply yet.
Peter does not reply to PM's here.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 7:01 pm
by Bufflehead Jones
agent5 wrote:
I sent PM to Peter but no reply yet.
Peter does not reply to PM's here.
:shock: .....Ummm........ :-k .......Please don't tell me that it was bink that replied to those pms that I sent to Peter. #-o

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 7:15 pm
by Michaelson
Yep, that was news to me too, Buff. :shock: How DID bink get access to Peter's PM account? He's written me on several occasions from there.:-k :wink:

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 7:33 pm
by Scandinavia Jones
Hmm... did these particular PMs involve cash transactions? I'm afraid you guys've been had. :shock:
This is becoming a nuisance - recently, I received a strange PM from a "Dr. Mbinko" who claimed to be a prominent lawyer from out of town... something about him wanting to transfer $10.000.000 to my bank account - all I needed to do was to PM him back with my account info. Alternatively, I could always send my wallet to some boiler room... didn't make much sense, so I didn't get back to him.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:08 pm
by Bufflehead Jones
Michaelson wrote:Yep, that was news to me too, Buff. :shock: How DID bink get access to Peter's PM account? He's written me on several occasions from there.:-k :wink:

Regards! Michaelson
I don't know. I thought he only took his wallet. #-o

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:13 pm
by agent5
I just assumed Peter never replied to PM's sent from here because he ignored maybe 5-6 of mine over the years and I've heard the same claim from many more members, always being told it's best just to call him.

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:54 am
by Erri
Maybe Peter has a life after his job! :lol:
:wink:

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:06 am
by Michaelson
Could be. :wink:

Regards! Michaelson

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:18 am
by agent5
Oh, I know he has a life as all our members do. However, almost all members will answer the pm's after life stops. Peter did not, 5 or 6 separate times. Like I said, I know I'm not the only one either.

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:08 am
by Michaelson
Could be too, agent5, but the answer is, yes, he DOES answer PM's here, and has so many times to many of us.

I believe, though, he prefers to reply to detailed questions and order discussions from his place of work so he has an official business record of the exchange. He doesn't really have that here through a PM.

Regards! Michaelson