Page 9 of 15

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:38 pm
by Browncoat
Indiana Holt wrote:
browncoat,

could you please tell me how long your jacket is?

and how much the top sleeves are now? measured flat over the bicep area.

looks really good!
My jacket is the standard 26 inch backlength. I chose it because I figured at 6' 1, Harrison should be taller than me (I know, can o' worms) and my jacket would fall at a similar spot.

If I had to do it all over I would add another inch.

The sleeves are also 25.5 inches giving me the 35 inch armlength that I wanted. The armhole is about 11 inches, bicep is at 8.5 inches and the cuff is at 6 inches.

The sleeves on my ToD actually match the measurements of the Todd's XXL Standard. The Wested ToD differs on the quality of leather which is miles above the Todd's and the body is more fitted on the Wested which I love. The jacket has this type of built in full chest -no baggy stomach area design.

I really like it. Hope that helps.

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:39 pm
by RCSignals
Kt Templar wrote:People who have one of production jackets may be able to confirm. The outer edge on the pleat should be stitched and glued. It's one of the details missing on the proto.
Thanks KT. There is the answer and what I thought. It should be stitched, as mine is and I think the NH was too. I don't think mine is glued as well though, and that's fine.

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:42 pm
by RCSignals
Browncoat wrote:
Indiana Holt wrote:
browncoat,

could you please tell me how long your jacket is?

and how much the top sleeves are now? measured flat over the bicep area.

looks really good!
My jacket is the standard 26 inch backlength. I chose it because I figured at 6' 1, Harrison should be taller than me (I know, can o' worms) and my jacket would fall at a similar spot.

If I had to do it all over I would add another inch.

The sleeves are also 25.5 inches giving me the 35 inch armlength that I wanted. The armhole is about 11 inches, bicep is at 8.5 inches and the cuff is at 6 inches.

The sleeves on my ToD actually match the measurements of the Todd's XXL Standard. The Wested ToD differs on the quality of leather which is miles above the Todd's and the body is more fitted on the Wested which I love. The jacket has this type of built in full chest -no baggy stomach area design.

I really like it. Hope that helps.
We just need the photos of yours now

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:46 pm
by Kt Templar
RCSignals wrote:
Kt Templar wrote:People who have one of production jackets may be able to confirm. The outer edge on the pleat should be stitched and glued. It's one of the details missing on the proto.
Thanks KT. There is the answer and what I thought. It should be stitched, as mine is and I think the NH was too. I don't think mine is glued as well though, and that's fine.
The NH one was stitched, but very lightly, it has almost all unravelled. :(.

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:48 pm
by Holt
Browncoat wrote:
Indiana Holt wrote:
browncoat,

could you please tell me how long your jacket is?

and how much the top sleeves are now? measured flat over the bicep area.

looks really good!
My jacket is the standard 26 inch backlength. I chose it because I figured at 6' 1, Harrison should be taller than me (I know, can o' worms) and my jacket would fall at a similar spot.

If I had to do it all over I would add another inch.

The sleeves are also 25.5 inches giving me the 35 inch armlength that I wanted. The armhole is about 11 inches, bicep is at 8.5 inches and the cuff is at 6 inches.

The sleeves on my ToD actually match the measurements of the Todd's XXL Standard. The Wested ToD differs on the quality of leather which is miles above the Todd's and the body is more fitted on the Wested which I love. The jacket has this type of built in full chest -no baggy stomach area design.

I really like it. Hope that helps.
that helps!

so take of .75'' from 8.5'' top sleeve you will end up with 7.75'' top sleeve.that would be TOO thoght for a 44.thats almost the same sizing for a 40 sized jacket top sleeve.


could you please tell me what the chest is. armpit seam to armpit seam.

thanks man

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:01 pm
by Browncoat
I sent you a pm but I will post to help others as well.

The chest measurement (below the armpit) is 23 inches for reference my Todd's XXL is 23 inches and my US Wings is 24 inches.

The actual armpit to armpit on my Todd's and US Wings is 21 inches. But the ToD is designed with a higher pit at 19 inches. Totally weird...but it does fit like a 44 like many of my other jackets; its the waist area that is slimfit. I dont' think I would wear this jacket if I still had my belly of last year. That's what the US Wings is for! :lol: :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:05 pm
by RCSignals
Measurements for Holt using the TN measurement guide



For my 40

A-B (not including collar stand) 23.5"

C-D laid flat 22.5"

E-F 21"

G-H 7.5"(this is to the true shoulder top not along the yoke top seam as that does not follow the shoulder.)

I-J 26.5" (this has stretched from 26")

K-L 20" (this is to the true shoulder top not along the yoke top seam as that does not follow the shoulder.)

M-N 25.75"

sleeve flat across bicep area 8" (stretched from 7.5")

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:33 pm
by Holt
thanks man.

by reading that I became alittle confused.

is the jacket alittle longer in the front from the back?

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:18 pm
by crismans
RCSignals wrote:The action pleat of the Wested reproduction is stitched, but from the photos the action pleat of the NH jacket appears to be as well. I can't imagine a glued action pleat holding at all.
KT tried it on maybe he remembers.
It doesn't hold. Of course, this is a screen grab and I've certainly been shown that these aren't definitive, but it does look interesting.

Image

Look at a close-up of the jacket from the palace scene you posted. Look at that curl in the jacket. It looks like a glued pleat that's came loose. Since the NH jacket had a stitch here, I guess the question was moot as to whether to include one on the Wested. I wouldn't have blamed Peter a bit for putting one there even if the NH hadn't had one for durability purposes.

And before I take any credit for this, Holt's the one that picked up on the glued pleat. We had poured over that thing forever wondering how the pleat worked and acted as it did. To me, it looks like a glued pleat that's broken loose.

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:32 pm
by RCSignals
Kt Templar wrote:
RCSignals wrote:
Kt Templar wrote:People who have one of production jackets may be able to confirm. The outer edge on the pleat should be stitched and glued. It's one of the details missing on the proto.
Thanks KT. There is the answer and what I thought. It should be stitched, as mine is and I think the NH was too. I don't think mine is glued as well though, and that's fine.
The NH one was stitched, but very lightly, it has almost all unravelled. :(.
As I recall from photos, even from watching the movie, there is a lot of undone stitching on that jacket

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:34 pm
by RCSignals
Indiana Holt wrote:thanks man.

by reading that I became alittle confused.

is the jacket alittle longer in the front from the back?
By those measurements it's longer in the back

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:36 pm
by RCSignals
crismans wrote:
RCSignals wrote:The action pleat of the Wested reproduction is stitched, but from the photos the action pleat of the NH jacket appears to be as well. I can't imagine a glued action pleat holding at all.
KT tried it on maybe he remembers.
It doesn't hold. Of course, this is a screen grab and I've certainly been shown that these aren't definitive, but it does look interesting.

Image

Look at a close-up of the jacket from the palace scene you posted. Look at that curl in the jacket. It looks like a glued pleat that's came loose. Since the NH jacket had a stitch here, I guess the question was moot as to whether to include one on the Wested. I wouldn't have blamed Peter a bit for putting one there even if the NH hadn't had one for durability purposes.

And before I take any credit for this, Holt's the one that picked up on the glued pleat. We had poured over that thing forever wondering how the pleat worked and acted as it did. To me, it looks like a glued pleat that's broken loose.
I think as KT said, it was stitched but much of the stitching had come undone. Even in that photo the outer edge looks like it was stitched.
Anyway it's an odd jacket in a lot of ways.

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:39 pm
by RCSignals
crismans wrote:
RCSignals wrote:The action pleat of the Wested reproduction is stitched, but from the photos the action pleat of the NH jacket appears to be as well. I can't imagine a glued action pleat holding at all.
KT tried it on maybe he remembers.
It doesn't hold. Of course, this is a screen grab and I've certainly been shown that these aren't definitive, but it does look interesting.

Image

Look at a close-up of the jacket from the palace scene you posted. Look at that curl in the jacket. It looks like a glued pleat that's came loose. Since the NH jacket had a stitch here, I guess the question was moot as to whether to include one on the Wested. I wouldn't have blamed Peter a bit for putting one there even if the NH hadn't had one for durability purposes.

And before I take any credit for this, Holt's the one that picked up on the glued pleat. We had poured over that thing forever wondering how the pleat worked and acted as it did. To me, it looks like a glued pleat that's broken loose.
The other thing about that photo is how it looks like the action back goes right to the sleeve. It actually doesn't but from the back from some angles, the way the back puffs up and the sleeve seam folds under, it appears that it does.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:24 am
by Kt Templar
The trough of the pleat is stitched too, just in case that picture made you think otherwise.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:24 am
by crismans
Just got an email from Gemma. They're still out of the washed and regular goat and are expecting a shipment within the next 7-10 working days. So there's a little wait for mine. I'm looking forward to getting this jacket and putting it with my Penman ToD. Geek Vahalla, here I come! 8)

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:49 am
by WhipDude
Why does Wested wait to order leather in such a busy season? You'd think they would have ordered when they were getting low so they would have it in stock. It's been weeks since they've had any. I ordered Nov 27th, reg goat. She told me through email last week Friday that it would be here this weekend. Guess I'm going to have to wait even longer.

I can't imagine how backed up they are because of that.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:12 pm
by Tibor
I thought I read that Peter got in an batch of hides he wasn't happy with since they had a dark line down the center where the spine would be. I think that set them back a bit.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:19 pm
by Michaelson
Yeah, it's on page 6 of this thread.
;-)
Regards !Michaelson

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:38 pm
by coronado3
I'm looking forward to getting this jacket and putting it with my Penman ToD
Crisman

Lets see that hat... post it in the hat section. I have yet to see a "good" version of the temple hat. I am speaking of the bridge scene hat not the horrible, tiny, tapered cockpit hat! :)

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:06 pm
by WhipDude
Your right Michaelson. I take back what I said. I forgot about that bad batch.

I hope they get the shipment in soon.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:49 pm
by RCSignals
Kt Templar wrote:The trough of the pleat is stitched too, just in case that picture made you think otherwise.
Thanks for the clarification KT. That's what I was saying, good to know I was not wrong.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:12 pm
by serrecuir
A question for anyone who's received their washed goat ToD jacket - have you/are you planning on soaking/washing it?

Before I received mine, I was all set to give it a warm water soak to remove any remaining dye, help cut the shine, bring out the texture of the leather, and bunch up the sleeves. But now that I have it, the leather is already shine-free. It's got such a beautiful matte finish, I hate to risk it by throwing it in water. I'm tempted to just wear the heck out of it and let it break in naturally. Let me know if anyone has taken the plunge, and please post pics if you have.

Kind regards,
Craig

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:41 pm
by whipwarrior
serrecuir, your jacket is AWESOME!!! The predistressed goat makes it look like you reached into the movie and pulled it right off Harrison's back (answering the long-standing question about why Indy is suddenly jacket-less midway through the film!) :lol:

That is undoubtably one of the finest Indy jackets I have ever seen. Wear it proudly, sir.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:42 pm
by crismans
I had a OTR Last Crusade in the washed goat and, even though I'm the world's worst to throw a new jacket in the wash, I didn't with that hide. Like you said, the hide's already got the matte finish so there's no shine to knock off. And the hide's so soft that it starts breaking in quickly and getting the creases, etc. (which is my other big reason for washing the jackets). I did put some Lexol on the jacket and it seemed to "toughen" up the leather (I've tried to explain what I mean here before and failed miserably). The hide really did soak up the Lexol.

I think I'd just wear it and forget about the wash myself. It really looks like you've had the jacket for years after only a few months. You're jacket looks great as it is.

And coronoado3, I've not gotten the hat yet but you can bet that I'll post a bunch of pictures when I do. I have to admit that I've had some qualms about going with a ToD but I really like how the hat looks when Indy punches out the guards before beginning to free the kids (similar to the bridge hat). Nice bash and the brim looks great there imo.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:24 pm
by serrecuir
whipwarrior wrote:serrecuir, your jacket is AWESOME!!! The predistressed goat makes it look like you reached into the movie and pulled it right off Harrison's back (answering the long-standing question about why Indy is suddenly jacket-less midway through the film!) :lol:

That is undoubtably one of the finest Indy jackets I have ever seen. Wear it proudly, sir.

WW,

Thanks for that compliment!! It is greatly appreciated. :) I AM extremely thrilled with this jacket, and wouldn't change a thing on it (oh, aside from tacking the inside pocket in place).

I've been torn between leaving the jacket alone and just wearing it vs. giving it a good soaking. Now I'm definitely leaning towards wearing it as is.

Thanks for the advice too, Crismans! And I agree with you on the Mine Car fedora - it is a great hat and would look amazing with this jacket. Be sure to post pics in your jacket when you get your Penman.

Kind regards,
Craig

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:25 pm
by Atticus
Just received my jacket today. Will either post pics tonight or sometime tomorrow. Just wanted to add that I am really impressed with this jacket.

Kevin

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:21 pm
by Browncoat
Okay finally got my camera back and took a couple quick shots. Sorry for the poor lighting but if I put the flash up the reflection is pretty great from the flash.

Anyway, you can get the idea of the fit and length of my jacket:

Open:

Image

Closed:

Image

Jeans are low rise boot cut so you would have to raise the belt buckle about an 1.25 inches to get normal (Indy) khaki waist.

The jacket screams giving it a good soak but I really can't distress it and expect to be able to wear it to work (business casual) so new looking it stays.

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:52 pm
by orb
Browncoat that's a very nice looking jacket you got there!
I like that narrower sleeves so much. What leather is this and jacket size?
Can't wait to get mine.

Regards

orb

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:53 pm
by PSBIndy
serrecuir wrote:A question for anyone who's received their washed goat ToD jacket - have you/are you planning on soaking/washing it?

Before I received mine, I was all set to give it a warm water soak to remove any remaining dye, help cut the shine, bring out the texture of the leather, and bunch up the sleeves. But now that I have it, the leather is already shine-free. It's got such a beautiful matte finish, I hate to risk it by throwing it in water. I'm tempted to just wear the heck out of it and let it break in naturally. Let me know if anyone has taken the plunge, and please post pics if you have.

Kind regards,
Craig
A few months ago, I got my LC washed goat thoroughly soaked during a thunderstorm. It dried pretty quickly and the matte finish stayed the same as when new.

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:27 am
by Browncoat
Thanks, orb: It's an authentic lamb 44 with the 26 inch back and 25.5 inch sleeve. If I had it to do over again, I probably would go washed goat with a 26.5 or 27 inch back.


This last pic is only for reference here is a pic of my Todd's Standard XXL:

Image


If one owns a Todd's Standard, perhaps one can base the fit of a Wested ToD on it? Maybe....at least its a reference to someone wanting to order.

The measurements of my Wested ToD 44 are VERY similar to my Todd's almost exact except for the Todd's is about 1/2 inch longer in back. Believe it or not the stormflap lengths are the same but the Todd "wears" longer for some reason. Might be that Todd's is a "fuller" cut at the shoulder and chest.

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:25 am
by RCSignals
The ToD jacket looks good Browncoat. I'm not sure it needs to longer.

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:37 am
by Holt
that looks really good.can we get a picture from the side?

want to see how those sleeves fold around your arms.

you look like you have the same body type as me.glad I added a some slak in the sleeves.

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:32 am
by RCSignals
Any more of these arrive?

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:00 am
by ReturningSon
Heard from Peter last night...their label machine was acting up..mine will be sent out today! YAH!!!! :) :)

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:50 pm
by McFly
Mine just came today... I'm a little unsure about the collar width (looks huge!) and I think it's too big, and I think the sleeves may be too long.... I was hoping to get them super wrinkled like at the end of the movie, but if the whole jacket is too big, it won't matter. Plus after seeing the washed goat I'm really wishing I'd gone with that instead of dark lamb, but that's that, isn't it? :cry: The lamb is too lightweight for me.. :( *sigh* I'll do some pictures in a minute.

Also, I ordered an unissued MkVII and that didn't come. :? I didn't even know my jacket had shipped! I guess it was nice to get a surprise?

Shane

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
by Holt
man,just shrink it abit.you love it.


cant wait to see the pics soon.

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:54 pm
by McFly
Aha!! This was my order:

Description: Temple of Doom Jacket
Jacket Size: 36
Sleeve Length: 24.5
Back Length: 25
Skin Type: Dk Brown Lambskin
Lining Type: Nylon
Extra Inside Pocket: None
Name Label (optional):
Special Requests: **JACKET SIZE 35**


And they sent me a 36? Were the caps and stars not enough? There's no option for any sizes below 36, but my Raiders jacket is a 34, so I know they make them smaller. Think I can change the leather and all that, too? :x

Shane

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:02 pm
by RCSignals
the sleeves will wrinkle and ride up. Just wear it "constantly" for a week or more.
How much too big in the chest is it? these tend to fit trim so I'm thinking the 36 when you asked for a 35 might be better than you think. Then again have you measured it? Maybe they just don't have any '35' labels?

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:06 pm
by McFly
Well the measurement across the chest is 18", so that means it's actually a 36. I'm not going to wear it anymore or try and wrinkle the sleeves because it's definitely the wrong size. I'd rather it fit trim than me have a jacket that looks bad because it's too big.

EDIT: I guess it's not even worth it to take the pictures, since I don't want this wrong size anyway. If they can't make me a 35 I'll just take a 34 like my Raiders jacket and be done with it. And if they can't do that, I'll just get a refund. Not turning out to be a great day. :?

Shane

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:50 pm
by HWaltonJonesJr.Phd
HOT HOT SHOWER

QUICK DRY


WEAR IT and push up the sleeves


repeat...



or battle the Wested demon...

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:55 pm
by RCSignals
McFly wrote:Well the measurement across the chest is 18", so that means it's actually a 36. I'm not going to wear it anymore or try and wrinkle the sleeves because it's definitely the wrong size. I'd rather it fit trim than me have a jacket that looks bad because it's too big.

EDIT: I guess it's not even worth it to take the pictures, since I don't want this wrong size anyway. If they can't make me a 35 I'll just take a 34 like my Raiders jacket and be done with it. And if they can't do that, I'll just get a refund. Not turning out to be a great day. :?

Shane
Sorry about all that. I hope it works out for you.

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:56 pm
by McFly
Thanks a bunch. I'm just relieved that it's something I can send back and not like I measured wrong and I'm stuck with the jacket.

Shane

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:59 pm
by RCSignals
I suppose you should start with a phone call and or email.
You wouldn't think there would be a problem getting a 35 :?

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:01 pm
by McFly
Yeah, I've emailed them, and also asked where my MkVII is. You'd think they could email you and let you know if something you paid for is out of stock... but I don't want to beat the dead horse on the double checking orders issue, or bash them... I will admit it's tough not to though, when you're upset.

Anyway, I'm sure things will resolve themselves one way or another. It's just a hassle.

Shane

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:11 pm
by coronado3
still take some pix of the details like the storm flap corner, pockets and the side vent... :[

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:34 pm
by McFly
Oh, no problem at all. I can do that!

Btw, the jacket does have prongs on the sliders, but they don't go through the strap - are they supposed to?

Here you go with those detail shots:

Image
Image
Image
Image

Shane

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:02 pm
by indy1936
I am having a hard time understanding what I am seeing. The back panel edge looks like the raiders version from the top down to the buckle. Then on the back panel near the bottom below the buckle it looks like the part that was folded under and stitched is now cut and sewn over top of the back panel? Does that make sense? I'm not sure if that description makes any sense? A picture appears below. Does this configuration make the very bottom of the back panel twist outward?
I am very confused.
:-k

Image

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:17 pm
by RCSignals
indy1936 wrote:I am having a hard time understanding what I am seeing. The back panel edge looks like the raiders version from the top down to the buckle. Then on the back panel near the bottom below the buckle it looks like the part that was folded under and stitched is now cut and sewn over top of the back panel? Does that make sense? I'm not sure if that description makes any sense? A picture appears below. Does this configuration make the very bottom of the back panel twist outward?
I am very confused.
:-k

Image
It's the odd way the ToD jacket vent was constructed. It looks to me almost like it was originally sewn up as an oversight then the stitching cut open to create the open vent.
The first ToD copies from Wested had the vent done differently (there are pics here somewhere) but it was actually a correction to a more conventional vent flap construction. Problem of course is the original jacket wasn't that way.


Wested has done a nice job of re-doing the vent and collar stand end.

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:19 pm
by RCSignals
McFly wrote:Oh, no problem at all. I can do that!

Btw, the jacket does have prongs on the sliders, but they don't go through the strap - are they supposed to?

Here you go with those detail shots:


Shane
Thanks for those photos Shane. They did a nice job, really too bad the jacket is too big.

The prongs of the buckle don't have to go through the strap, and I'm not sure they actually did on the NH jacket.

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:33 pm
by McFly
RCSignals wrote:Thanks for those photos Shane. They did a nice job, really too bad the jacket is too big.
No problem! I really wish it was my size... but hopefully soon it will be!

Shane