Insulting? I really have no idea where you are getting that from. Just because I don't agree with your take doesn't make that an insult.
I would like to think I brought useful information and evidence that was unavailable to you. You have chosen to ignore it all because it doesn't fit your agenda. For a guy that just showed up here just four months ago....... to tell me to step away is the REAL insult.
At any rate, I will no longer provide any more advice and information on this subject. Consider me "stepped away".
[/quote]
If you think that as an insult, I apologize. My reference is to you belittling my every attempt to bring to light the possibility that the hat in those scenes is indeed brown. You did the color experiment, and everyone suddenly says(once again) "Oh, that clears it up again!" Then I do the EXACT same thing, and I'm completely ignored, told the colors don't match, or a silly derogatory statement like "Well you're not in tunisia to have a reference to compare the size of the ribbon" or something to that nature. I've been called everything from color blind,to having an inferior computer, to mocking my sign-out(have a nice day)-all because I think a hat is brown and not grey. You seem to think that because I think the hat is brown,that I'm an idiot! New things come to light all the time! Look at the Antidote vial thread. Magnoli himself said "this shows why the archives can't always be trusted" because of the jewels discovered on the vial. I've done ANYTHING but ignore your input, I even copied your experiment to try to show you how it could be flawed, that's all. I've heard all that you've said, but it almost invariably comes back to the info that Michaelson has given. To me,(no insult meant) this just isn't solid enough evidence. Obviously they are trustworthy sources, but the evidence itself is just not there.
Posting above is correct, until solid evidence is found, we'll never know. But we can post our hypothesis constructively, can't we? I don't expect you to agree to "my take", just like I hope you don't expect me to take one persons word as gospel. I'm just asking you to take an objective look at my evidence, and hopefully, nicely present your own.
I've said this before, I'm not trying to argue! I'm simply posting my reasoning as to why I think a certain thing. No different then 3Kbucks posting about his Pork Pie, line on the hat theories. Or Fedora posting about why he thinks the hat is so and so tall. Or Magnoli posting why he thinks the Headpiece is a certain diameter, and so on.
Yes, you WERE and ARE bringing useful info to the table, but it seems(to me at least) that it is with a less than friendly approach(if I'm wrong, once again, apologies) Yes I've been a member for only four months, but I've watched the forum for years. Not to mention been a huge Indy fan for much longer. I could say I'm not getting much of a warm welcome as a newbie, but I'm not that concerned with it. I'm just here to discuss topics with people who want to discuss topics. It's no news to me that my postings are being avoided like the plague, and the cold shoulder feels great
. But, whatever. I'll still probably try to show in example after example WHY I think the hat is brown. Maybe some will see it , maybe some won't WHO CARES! I'm just discussing it! It doesn't really matter in the greater scheme of things, but then, neither does anything else we talk about on this forum, but WE STILL TALK ABOUT 'EM.
have a nice day.