Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Moderators: Mike, Cajunkraut, Tennessee Smith
- Arkansas Smith
- Laboratory Technician
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 2:27 pm
- Location: No snake eating here!
-
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:09 pm
- Location: South America 1936
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Yikes! There goes more potential profit. Or recouping of investment. Or adds to the loss.
- Herr Doktor
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 7:12 pm
- Location: I don't know...I'm making this up as I go
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Whoops! Disregard.
- fifthchamber
- Professor of Archaeology
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:59 am
- Location: Tachikawa, Tokyo
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I think that's entirely right to do...The Frost River backpack was a clear standout, and the fans jumped on it...But allowing an entirely different company to run with the branding? Seems to me, to be entirely the wrong thing to do here. Filson make decent gear, but none of it was used on the movie, and to allow them to slide in on another companies gear is just wrong..There's always a decent way to do things, and this isn't it....
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Man, when it rains...it pours!
- Indy Magnoli
- Staff Member
- Posts: 6970
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 4:00 am
- Location: Middle Earth, New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Would be interested in seeing the ad.
- Indiana Jeff
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10204
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
- Location: TX Panhandle
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Me as well.
My bet is LFL/Filson will recut the ad removing the bit with the Frost River bag and the whole thing will be dismissed by the courts.
Otherwise it’s going to incumbent on Frost River to prove material harm. We might all be subpoenaed!
Though I would like to think Frost River can make the case that trademark was violated by the removal of their patch.
As well, it would be like if the Broccoli’s cut a deal with Chevy and did a Bond centric commercial. It’s not like someone is going to confuse a Chevy for an Aston Martin.
Mistaking one canvas pack for another is far more likely.
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
My bet is LFL/Filson will recut the ad removing the bit with the Frost River bag and the whole thing will be dismissed by the courts.
Otherwise it’s going to incumbent on Frost River to prove material harm. We might all be subpoenaed!
Though I would like to think Frost River can make the case that trademark was violated by the removal of their patch.
As well, it would be like if the Broccoli’s cut a deal with Chevy and did a Bond centric commercial. It’s not like someone is going to confuse a Chevy for an Aston Martin.
Mistaking one canvas pack for another is far more likely.
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
- fifthchamber
- Professor of Archaeology
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:59 am
- Location: Tachikawa, Tokyo
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
https://www.filson.com/indiana-jones
I think this is the "ad" meant...It's not overt, but having a bag like that, in a company site like this? Does link the two somewhat...
I think this is the "ad" meant...It's not overt, but having a bag like that, in a company site like this? Does link the two somewhat...
- Indiana Jeff
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10204
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
- Location: TX Panhandle
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
100% If the pack hadn’t already been identified I’d be scouring the Filson website to figure out which one was used in the movie. Poor form.
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
- fifthchamber
- Professor of Archaeology
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:59 am
- Location: Tachikawa, Tokyo
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Indiana Jeff wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:30 pm 100% If the pack hadn’t already been identified I’d be scouring the Filson website to figure out which one was used in the movie. Poor form.
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
Yeah eh? The handy links to the bags are close by too...It's a little unfair, and on the nose.....Nothing really, even close in the Filson website....(I had to look...LOL)
-
- Laboratory Technician
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:38 am
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Yikes that clip showing the backpack is SO quick ....seems like milliseconds....it seems Frost River will have a hard time showing any 'material damage'
-
- Laboratory Technician
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:38 am
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
...on the other hand, the publicity of filing the lawsuit will point a lot of people to Frost River, so I guess they should take the win
- Indiana Jeff
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10204
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
- Location: TX Panhandle
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I wonder how much blowback Filson will get from people contacting them and asking for the same bag carried by Indiana Jones.
“Um. We have bags that are similar to what he carries, but not exact.”
“Oh, was the bag Indy uses a special prop piece made by you just for the movie?”
“How about I show you these really nice bags over here.”
The real shame is LFL would never let Frost River advertise the packs as an “Indiana Jones Pack,” but are OK with Filson misrepresenting their packs in the movie through this ad.
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
“Um. We have bags that are similar to what he carries, but not exact.”
“Oh, was the bag Indy uses a special prop piece made by you just for the movie?”
“How about I show you these really nice bags over here.”
The real shame is LFL would never let Frost River advertise the packs as an “Indiana Jones Pack,” but are OK with Filson misrepresenting their packs in the movie through this ad.
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I’m still stuck on Frost River’s assertion that a studio has to “ask permission” to use a product in a film. LOL.
The interest runs the other way: companies PAY for studios to use their product in their films; the studios don’t ask permission.
And it’s a “trademark violation” to remove the branding? It literally happens all the time. How many times do you see laptops in films with no branding? Or cameras in which the “Canon” or “Nikon” has been obscured? All the time.
I think this is just an attempt by Frost River to grab some attention. Unfortunately, I’m not sure how many of their customer base reads The Hollywood Reporter.
The interest runs the other way: companies PAY for studios to use their product in their films; the studios don’t ask permission.
And it’s a “trademark violation” to remove the branding? It literally happens all the time. How many times do you see laptops in films with no branding? Or cameras in which the “Canon” or “Nikon” has been obscured? All the time.
I think this is just an attempt by Frost River to grab some attention. Unfortunately, I’m not sure how many of their customer base reads The Hollywood Reporter.
Last edited by TonyRush on Fri Jul 21, 2023 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44483
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
True, but the story has been picked up by a lot more news agencies and it’s making the rounds.
Regards! M
Regards! M
- Castor Dioscuri
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
That means this previously obscure part of Indy gear fandom has now gone mainstream!!!
Who wants to place bets we'll shortly see a price increase?
Who wants to place bets we'll shortly see a price increase?
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44483
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Oh, they’re WELL aware of our watching the films with microscopes now!
Regards!
Regards!
- whipitgood
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: Los Angeles "A handsome devil in the city of angels."
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
It’s only a problem if you defame their product. I don’t recall the bag falling apart at any point, so it performs its function as intended.
- Indy Magnoli
- Staff Member
- Posts: 6970
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 4:00 am
- Location: Middle Earth, New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I could be wrong, but I think it's pretty standard. We sold some sunglasses to a film company and they asked our permission to use them in the film (and this was just for background characters, I think... because I couldn't even spot them in the movie). So for a BIG production and a piece to be used pretty prominently in the film and advertising... yeah, they probably should have had Frost River sign something...
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Don't see why they would need permission if they removed the logo. Lucasfilm bought the bags and can do whatever they want with them. If you ask permission then you don't need to remove logos. Its not even legally required, just a CYA, just in case. In TV its mostly to avoid accidentally advertising a competitor of a sponsor.
- Indiana Jeff
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10204
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
- Location: TX Panhandle
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
That's an "interesting" description.
Frost River is asking for a minimum of $75,000. I can see Disney/LFL cutting them a check without blinking an eye. It would be worth the goodwill to say, "We didn't mean to cause any harm and are happy to support a small, American brand."
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
Frost River is asking for a minimum of $75,000. I can see Disney/LFL cutting them a check without blinking an eye. It would be worth the goodwill to say, "We didn't mean to cause any harm and are happy to support a small, American brand."
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
It seems that half the sites reporting this are missing the point of what the real core issue is. The 'without permission' stuff is just extra window dressing on FRs part. Disney used their product in a movie (not credited them) and awarded a promotional licence to a different company. Obviously that aint right, it's happened before in movies and it usually gets sorted out.
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:
https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
- backstagejack
- Legendary Adventurer
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:01 am
- Location: Lost in the Jungle
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
xmasters wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2023 7:23 pm .......The 'without permission' stuff is just extra window dressing on FRs part. Disney used their product in a movie (not credited them) and awarded a promotional licence to a different company. Obviously that aint right, it's happened before in movies and it usually gets sorted out.
So I definitely get this..... but what's the difference between using..... a HJ hat but then selling a dorfman as the official hat?
Sure, HJ is getting more traffic as they supplied the hat..... so is Frost River..... but none will get as much traffic as the dorfman hats from the layman out there that just wants an "indiana jones hat".
I guess it comes down to it that Disney didn't inform them of its usage and then didn't have them sign anything in that regards.
They're taking advantage of it though with their....Legacy Collection and "Artifact Edition" which ironically shows the pack with its patch removed.
https://frostriver.com/pages/carry-the- ... bead&_ss=r"For a limited time we will be offering our tried and true Geologist Pack without the leather oval patch, matching the pack that is featured in a lead role of a Hollywood film franchise. (Please note we will NOT accommodate any other special requests, nor will be offering to omit the patch on any other Frost River products.)"
This must be a little bit of an extra little twist of the knife with how much disney has already lost on this film, to now have to pay out more money.....however "small" the amount turns out to be.
- Indiana Jeff
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10204
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
- Location: TX Panhandle
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I think the difference is HJ openly advertises that they produced the hats for the Indiana Jones movies. My understanding is Frost River is forbidden from overtly saying it's their packs in the movie so their bag gets used, they're not allowed to acknowledge that and Filson is now using Indiana Jones to promote their products.
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
Regards,
Indiana Jeff
- backstagejack
- Legendary Adventurer
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:01 am
- Location: Lost in the Jungle
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Ah, okay that makes sense. And Disney can't let them advertise it because of the Filson connection?
If that's the case, I definitely get the lawsuit.
I like that they're offering the bag sans the patch now.... even if it is temporary.
If that's the case, I definitely get the lawsuit.
I like that they're offering the bag sans the patch now.... even if it is temporary.
- Castor Dioscuri
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Oh god, I never thought I'd be drooling over a gas mask bag reproduction (why settle for a copy?), but this is a thing in beauty, even if only in construction!TonyRush wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:08 pm I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:
https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
An Indy bag in waxed canvas? What looks to be extra closures? And hopefully dividers with the 21st century lifestyle in mind? I'm definitely one! I also love that it actually looks pretty tasteful, considering the choice of materials, and wouldn't look out of place with an Ernest Alexander duffel...
- bearbeast
- Legendary Adventurer
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:31 am
- Location: Lost in the search for gear...
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I like how they call it an archaeologist bag, when it's rather a grave robber bag...Castor Dioscuri wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 5:28 amOh god, I never thought I'd be drooling over a gas mask bag reproduction (why settle for a copy?), but this is a thing in beauty, even if only in construction!TonyRush wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:08 pm I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:
https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
An Indy bag in waxed canvas? What looks to be extra closures? And hopefully dividers with the 21st century lifestyle in mind? I'm definitely one! I also love that it actually looks pretty tasteful, considering the choice of materials, and wouldn't look out of place with an Ernest Alexander duffel...
-
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:09 pm
- Location: South America 1936
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Thanks for sharing this, I was looking for something like this 6 months ago and settled for a non-waxed version.TonyRush wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:08 pm I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:
https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
I'm trying to find where they made this announcement. I don't see it on the page linked above. Does anyone have details on how to order this?backstagejack wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:11 pmhttps://frostriver.com/pages/carry-the- ... bead&_ss=r"For a limited time we will be offering our tried and true Geologist Pack without the leather oval patch, matching the pack that is featured in a lead role of a Hollywood film franchise. (Please note we will NOT accommodate any other special requests, nor will be offering to omit the patch on any other Frost River products.)"
This must be a little bit of an extra little twist of the knife with how much disney has already lost on this film, to now have to pay out more money.....however "small" the amount turns out to be.
Tony
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Disregard my previous question. I found it here:
https://frostriver.com/products/geologi ... ct-edition
It's in the "Description" section. You have to click the [+] sign to see it.
https://frostriver.com/products/geologi ... ct-edition
It's in the "Description" section. You have to click the [+] sign to see it.
- marker2037
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 11:04 pm
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
This is the truth. Everyone seems to think that a production company "needs permission" to use a product, but that's not true. If they bought it, they own it and they can do whatever they like with it. As you state, the reason branding is blocked out on TV is due to advertising sponsors, but movies (mostly) don't have reasons to do that.Lightning wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:24 pm Don't see why they would need permission if they removed the logo. Lucasfilm bought the bags and can do whatever they want with them. If you ask permission then you don't need to remove logos. Its not even legally required, just a CYA, just in case. In TV its mostly to avoid accidentally advertising a competitor of a sponsor.
I'm sure the real reason the production team took off the patch was simply because they thought the bag looked better and more authentic without it, not because the audience would have been able to make out the tiny Frost River logo and that it was against copyright rules or anything like that.
Still, poor form from Filson and LucasFilm for trying to capitalize on another brand's product so I have no problem with why Frost River did what they did.
- Castor Dioscuri
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
What Frost River is citing is the Lanham Act:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_ ... to%20occur.
It's not so much about Lucasfilm taking off the patch in the film that is the issue, as it is about them having the patch off and showing Frost River's backpacks in co-branded ads for Filson. Hence, consumer confusion.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_ ... to%20occur.
It's not so much about Lucasfilm taking off the patch in the film that is the issue, as it is about them having the patch off and showing Frost River's backpacks in co-branded ads for Filson. Hence, consumer confusion.
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Hmm...I'm not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV). But, my understanding is that the Landham Act refers to the protection of actual trademarks; not to the goods and services produced by companies who hold trademarks.Castor Dioscuri wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2023 5:38 am What Frost River is citing is the Lanham Act:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_ ... to%20occur.
It's not so much about Lucasfilm taking off the patch in the film that is the issue, as it is about them having the patch off and showing Frost River's backpacks in co-branded ads for Filson. Hence, consumer confusion.
But, I can certainly understand Frost River being upset at seeing their product showing up in a competing company's video. I just don't think it's enough to cause "material harm" to their company or brand.
Plus, if they're really intending on fighting with Lucasfilm, I think they may have muddied the waters of their argument by selling an unbranded version of the bag in question on their own website. If I were the defendant's attorney, I would point out that the Frost River must not be too worried about the identity of the bag since they're more than willing to sell it themselves. But, again, that's just me.
Tony
- Castor Dioscuri
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Excerpt from the filing:TonyRush wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 6:27 pmHmm...I'm not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV). But, my understanding is that the Landham Act refers to the protection of actual trademarks; not to the goods and services produced by companies who hold trademarks.Castor Dioscuri wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2023 5:38 am What Frost River is citing is the Lanham Act:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_ ... to%20occur.
It's not so much about Lucasfilm taking off the patch in the film that is the issue, as it is about them having the patch off and showing Frost River's backpacks in co-branded ads for Filson. Hence, consumer confusion.
Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)) prohibits a competitor from engaging in commercial advertising, marketing, or promotion that “misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of” its own or a competitor's “goods, services, or commercial activities.” The Lanham Act also prohibits a competitor from making “any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact which ...is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation,connection, association ... as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of its own “goods, services, or commercial activities.”
...One of the Lanham Act’s main purposes is to prevent a competitor from misleading the public by placing their competitor’s work forward as its own. It is a remedial statute that is to be broadly applied and construed so asto effectuate its remedial purpose.
Section 43(a) specifically prohibits the use of false descriptions and false designations of origin when advertising or selling goods or services incommerce. The Lanham Act proscribes the reproduction of a work with a falsedescription or attribution as to its creator. Liability under Section 43(a) may arise for a false description or representation even though no trademark is involved. A false designation of origin claim is not limited to literal falsehoods, it also extends to false representations made by implication or innuendo.
Section 43(a) prohibits a practice termed as reverse passing off (also called reverse palming off) in which competitor “A” sells or promotes competitor“B’s” product under “A’s” name. Express reverse passing off occurs when one party obtains the product of a second party, removes the second party's name or trademarks, and then markets or promotes the product under its own name. Reverse passing off activities have been recognized as wrongful because they involve attempts to misappropriate or profit from another's talents and workmanship. The harm from reverse passing off is that the purchaser or viewer is deceived or misled into believing that the products or services come from a source other than the plaintiff. Reverse passing off involuntarily deprives the originator of the product ofthe advertising value of its name and the goodwill that otherwise would stem from public knowledge of the true source of the product.
No argument there!
Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit
Castor, thanks for that additional information! It definitely clarifies.
Thanks!
Tony
Thanks!
Tony
- Castor Dioscuri
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am