Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Bags, Boots, Shirts and all other gear should be discussed here.

Moderators: Mike, Cajunkraut, Tennessee Smith

Post Reply
User avatar
Arkansas Smith
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 2:27 pm
Location: No snake eating here!

Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Arkansas Smith »

IndianaJustin
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1363
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:09 pm
Location: South America 1936

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by IndianaJustin »

Yikes! There goes more potential profit. Or recouping of investment. Or adds to the loss. #-o
User avatar
Herr Doktor
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 7:12 pm
Location: I don't know...I'm making this up as I go

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Herr Doktor »

Whoops! Disregard.
User avatar
fifthchamber
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Tachikawa, Tokyo

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by fifthchamber »

I think that's entirely right to do...The Frost River backpack was a clear standout, and the fans jumped on it...But allowing an entirely different company to run with the branding? Seems to me, to be entirely the wrong thing to do here. Filson make decent gear, but none of it was used on the movie, and to allow them to slide in on another companies gear is just wrong..There's always a decent way to do things, and this isn't it....
User avatar
Charybdis
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1657
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:36 pm
Location: Palmetto State (SC)

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Charybdis »

Man, when it rains...it pours!
User avatar
Indy Magnoli
Staff Member
Staff Member
Posts: 6974
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 4:00 am
Location: Middle Earth, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Indy Magnoli »

Would be interested in seeing the ad. :-k
User avatar
Indiana Jeff
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10212
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
Location: TX Panhandle

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Indiana Jeff »

Me as well.

My bet is LFL/Filson will recut the ad removing the bit with the Frost River bag and the whole thing will be dismissed by the courts.

Otherwise it’s going to incumbent on Frost River to prove material harm. We might all be subpoenaed!

Though I would like to think Frost River can make the case that trademark was violated by the removal of their patch.

As well, it would be like if the Broccoli’s cut a deal with Chevy and did a Bond centric commercial. It’s not like someone is going to confuse a Chevy for an Aston Martin.

Mistaking one canvas pack for another is far more likely.


Regards,

Indiana Jeff
User avatar
fifthchamber
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Tachikawa, Tokyo

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by fifthchamber »

https://www.filson.com/indiana-jones

I think this is the "ad" meant...It's not overt, but having a bag like that, in a company site like this? Does link the two somewhat...
User avatar
Indiana Jeff
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10212
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
Location: TX Panhandle

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Indiana Jeff »

100% If the pack hadn’t already been identified I’d be scouring the Filson website to figure out which one was used in the movie. Poor form.

Regards,

Indiana Jeff
User avatar
fifthchamber
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Tachikawa, Tokyo

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by fifthchamber »

Indiana Jeff wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:30 pm 100% If the pack hadn’t already been identified I’d be scouring the Filson website to figure out which one was used in the movie. Poor form.

Regards,

Indiana Jeff

Yeah eh? The handy links to the bags are close by too...It's a little unfair, and on the nose.....Nothing really, even close in the Filson website....(I had to look...LOL)
Adirondack Jones
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:38 am

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Adirondack Jones »

Yikes that clip showing the backpack is SO quick ....seems like milliseconds....it seems Frost River will have a hard time showing any 'material damage'
Adirondack Jones
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:38 am

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Adirondack Jones »

...on the other hand, the publicity of filing the lawsuit will point a lot of people to Frost River, so I guess they should take the win
User avatar
Indiana Jeff
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10212
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
Location: TX Panhandle

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Indiana Jeff »

I wonder how much blowback Filson will get from people contacting them and asking for the same bag carried by Indiana Jones.

“Um. We have bags that are similar to what he carries, but not exact.”

“Oh, was the bag Indy uses a special prop piece made by you just for the movie?”

“How about I show you these really nice bags over here.”

The real shame is LFL would never let Frost River advertise the packs as an “Indiana Jones Pack,” but are OK with Filson misrepresenting their packs in the movie through this ad.


Regards,

Indiana Jeff
TonyRush
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by TonyRush »

I’m still stuck on Frost River’s assertion that a studio has to “ask permission” to use a product in a film. LOL.

The interest runs the other way: companies PAY for studios to use their product in their films; the studios don’t ask permission.

And it’s a “trademark violation” to remove the branding? It literally happens all the time. How many times do you see laptops in films with no branding? Or cameras in which the “Canon” or “Nikon” has been obscured? All the time.

I think this is just an attempt by Frost River to grab some attention. Unfortunately, I’m not sure how many of their customer base reads The Hollywood Reporter.
Last edited by TonyRush on Fri Jul 21, 2023 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44486
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Michaelson »

True, but the story has been picked up by a lot more news agencies and it’s making the rounds.

Regards! M :M:
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

That means this previously obscure part of Indy gear fandom has now gone mainstream!!! :Dietrich:

Who wants to place bets we'll shortly see a price increase? ;)
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44486
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Michaelson »

Oh, they’re WELL aware of our watching the films with microscopes now! :lol:

Regards!
User avatar
whipitgood
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: Los Angeles "A handsome devil in the city of angels."

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by whipitgood »

TonyRush wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:11 pm I’m still stuck on Frost River’s assertion that a studio has to “ask permission” to use a product in a film. LOL.

The interest runs the other way: companies PAY for studios to use their product in their films; the studios don’t ask permission.

It’s only a problem if you defame their product. I don’t recall the bag falling apart at any point, so it performs its function as intended.
User avatar
Indy Magnoli
Staff Member
Staff Member
Posts: 6974
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 4:00 am
Location: Middle Earth, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Indy Magnoli »

TonyRush wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:11 pmI’m still stuck on Frost River’s assertion that a studio has to “ask permission” to use a product in a film. LOL.
I could be wrong, but I think it's pretty standard. We sold some sunglasses to a film company and they asked our permission to use them in the film (and this was just for background characters, I think... because I couldn't even spot them in the movie). So for a BIG production and a piece to be used pretty prominently in the film and advertising... yeah, they probably should have had Frost River sign something...
User avatar
Lightning
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 300
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 6:06 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Lightning »

Don't see why they would need permission if they removed the logo. Lucasfilm bought the bags and can do whatever they want with them. If you ask permission then you don't need to remove logos. Its not even legally required, just a CYA, just in case. In TV its mostly to avoid accidentally advertising a competitor of a sponsor.
LNBright
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 3:57 pm
Location: TN-VA line

Quirky?!

Post by LNBright »

User avatar
Indiana Jeff
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10212
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
Location: TX Panhandle

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Indiana Jeff »

That's an "interesting" description.

Frost River is asking for a minimum of $75,000. I can see Disney/LFL cutting them a check without blinking an eye. It would be worth the goodwill to say, "We didn't mean to cause any harm and are happy to support a small, American brand."

Regards,

Indiana Jeff
xmasters
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:50 am
Location: UK

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by xmasters »

It seems that half the sites reporting this are missing the point of what the real core issue is. The 'without permission' stuff is just extra window dressing on FRs part. Disney used their product in a movie (not credited them) and awarded a promotional licence to a different company. Obviously that aint right, it's happened before in movies and it usually gets sorted out.
TonyRush
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by TonyRush »

I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:

https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
User avatar
backstagejack
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:01 am
Location: Lost in the Jungle

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by backstagejack »

xmasters wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 7:23 pm .......The 'without permission' stuff is just extra window dressing on FRs part. Disney used their product in a movie (not credited them) and awarded a promotional licence to a different company. Obviously that aint right, it's happened before in movies and it usually gets sorted out.

So I definitely get this..... but what's the difference between using..... a HJ hat but then selling a dorfman as the official hat?

Sure, HJ is getting more traffic as they supplied the hat..... so is Frost River..... but none will get as much traffic as the dorfman hats from the layman out there that just wants an "indiana jones hat".

I guess it comes down to it that Disney didn't inform them of its usage and then didn't have them sign anything in that regards. :-k

They're taking advantage of it though with their....Legacy Collection and "Artifact Edition" which ironically shows the pack with its patch removed.
"For a limited time we will be offering our tried and true Geologist Pack without the leather oval patch, matching the pack that is featured in a lead role of a Hollywood film franchise. (Please note we will NOT accommodate any other special requests, nor will be offering to omit the patch on any other Frost River products.)"
https://frostriver.com/pages/carry-the- ... bead&_ss=r



This must be a little bit of an extra little twist of the knife with how much disney has already lost on this film, to now have to pay out more money.....however "small" the amount turns out to be.
User avatar
Indiana Jeff
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10212
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
Location: TX Panhandle

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Indiana Jeff »

I think the difference is HJ openly advertises that they produced the hats for the Indiana Jones movies. My understanding is Frost River is forbidden from overtly saying it's their packs in the movie so their bag gets used, they're not allowed to acknowledge that and Filson is now using Indiana Jones to promote their products.

Regards,

Indiana Jeff
User avatar
backstagejack
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:01 am
Location: Lost in the Jungle

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by backstagejack »

Ah, okay that makes sense. And Disney can't let them advertise it because of the Filson connection?

If that's the case, I definitely get the lawsuit.

I like that they're offering the bag sans the patch now.... even if it is temporary.
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

TonyRush wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:08 pm I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:

https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
Oh god, I never thought I'd be drooling over a gas mask bag reproduction (why settle for a copy?), but this is a thing in beauty, even if only in construction!

An Indy bag in waxed canvas? What looks to be extra closures? And hopefully dividers with the 21st century lifestyle in mind? I'm definitely one! I also love that it actually looks pretty tasteful, considering the choice of materials, and wouldn't look out of place with an Ernest Alexander duffel...
User avatar
bearbeast
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:31 am
Location: Lost in the search for gear...

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by bearbeast »

Castor Dioscuri wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 5:28 am
TonyRush wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:08 pm I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:

https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
Oh god, I never thought I'd be drooling over a gas mask bag reproduction (why settle for a copy?), but this is a thing in beauty, even if only in construction!

An Indy bag in waxed canvas? What looks to be extra closures? And hopefully dividers with the 21st century lifestyle in mind? I'm definitely one! I also love that it actually looks pretty tasteful, considering the choice of materials, and wouldn't look out of place with an Ernest Alexander duffel...
I like how they call it an archaeologist bag, when it's rather a grave robber bag... :CR:
IndianaJustin
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1363
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:09 pm
Location: South America 1936

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by IndianaJustin »

TonyRush wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:08 pm I just realized another reason why Frost River is likely a bit prickly: they sell their own version of Indy’s gas mask bag…but (of course) without coming out and claiming an affiliation:

https://frostriver.com/products/archaeologist-satchel
Thanks for sharing this, I was looking for something like this 6 months ago and settled for a non-waxed version. :TOH:
TonyRush
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by TonyRush »

backstagejack wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:11 pm
"For a limited time we will be offering our tried and true Geologist Pack without the leather oval patch, matching the pack that is featured in a lead role of a Hollywood film franchise. (Please note we will NOT accommodate any other special requests, nor will be offering to omit the patch on any other Frost River products.)"
https://frostriver.com/pages/carry-the- ... bead&_ss=r



This must be a little bit of an extra little twist of the knife with how much disney has already lost on this film, to now have to pay out more money.....however "small" the amount turns out to be.
I'm trying to find where they made this announcement. I don't see it on the page linked above. Does anyone have details on how to order this?

Tony
TonyRush
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by TonyRush »

Disregard my previous question. I found it here:
https://frostriver.com/products/geologi ... ct-edition

It's in the "Description" section. You have to click the [+] sign to see it.
User avatar
marker2037
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 11:04 pm

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by marker2037 »

Lightning wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:24 pm Don't see why they would need permission if they removed the logo. Lucasfilm bought the bags and can do whatever they want with them. If you ask permission then you don't need to remove logos. Its not even legally required, just a CYA, just in case. In TV its mostly to avoid accidentally advertising a competitor of a sponsor.
This is the truth. Everyone seems to think that a production company "needs permission" to use a product, but that's not true. If they bought it, they own it and they can do whatever they like with it. As you state, the reason branding is blocked out on TV is due to advertising sponsors, but movies (mostly) don't have reasons to do that.

I'm sure the real reason the production team took off the patch was simply because they thought the bag looked better and more authentic without it, not because the audience would have been able to make out the tiny Frost River logo and that it was against copyright rules or anything like that.

Still, poor form from Filson and LucasFilm for trying to capitalize on another brand's product so I have no problem with why Frost River did what they did.
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

What Frost River is citing is the Lanham Act:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_ ... to%20occur.

It's not so much about Lucasfilm taking off the patch in the film that is the issue, as it is about them having the patch off and showing Frost River's backpacks in co-branded ads for Filson. Hence, consumer confusion.
TonyRush
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by TonyRush »

Castor Dioscuri wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 5:38 am What Frost River is citing is the Lanham Act:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_ ... to%20occur.

It's not so much about Lucasfilm taking off the patch in the film that is the issue, as it is about them having the patch off and showing Frost River's backpacks in co-branded ads for Filson. Hence, consumer confusion.
Hmm...I'm not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV). But, my understanding is that the Landham Act refers to the protection of actual trademarks; not to the goods and services produced by companies who hold trademarks.

But, I can certainly understand Frost River being upset at seeing their product showing up in a competing company's video. I just don't think it's enough to cause "material harm" to their company or brand.

Plus, if they're really intending on fighting with Lucasfilm, I think they may have muddied the waters of their argument by selling an unbranded version of the bag in question on their own website. If I were the defendant's attorney, I would point out that the Frost River must not be too worried about the identity of the bag since they're more than willing to sell it themselves. But, again, that's just me.

Tony
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

TonyRush wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 6:27 pm
Castor Dioscuri wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 5:38 am What Frost River is citing is the Lanham Act:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_ ... to%20occur.

It's not so much about Lucasfilm taking off the patch in the film that is the issue, as it is about them having the patch off and showing Frost River's backpacks in co-branded ads for Filson. Hence, consumer confusion.
Hmm...I'm not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV). But, my understanding is that the Landham Act refers to the protection of actual trademarks; not to the goods and services produced by companies who hold trademarks.
Excerpt from the filing:
Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)) prohibits a competitor from engaging in commercial advertising, marketing, or promotion that “misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of” its own or a competitor's “goods, services, or commercial activities.” The Lanham Act also prohibits a competitor from making “any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact which ...is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation,connection, association ... as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of its own “goods, services, or commercial activities.”

...One of the Lanham Act’s main purposes is to prevent a competitor from misleading the public by placing their competitor’s work forward as its own. It is a remedial statute that is to be broadly applied and construed so asto effectuate its remedial purpose.

Section 43(a) specifically prohibits the use of false descriptions and false designations of origin when advertising or selling goods or services incommerce. The Lanham Act proscribes the reproduction of a work with a falsedescription or attribution as to its creator. Liability under Section 43(a) may arise for a false description or representation even though no trademark is involved. A false designation of origin claim is not limited to literal falsehoods, it also extends to false representations made by implication or innuendo.

Section 43(a) prohibits a practice termed as reverse passing off (also called reverse palming off) in which competitor “A” sells or promotes competitor“B’s” product under “A’s” name. Express reverse passing off occurs when one party obtains the product of a second party, removes the second party's name or trademarks, and then markets or promotes the product under its own name. Reverse passing off activities have been recognized as wrongful because they involve attempts to misappropriate or profit from another's talents and workmanship. The harm from reverse passing off is that the purchaser or viewer is deceived or misled into believing that the products or services come from a source other than the plaintiff. Reverse passing off involuntarily deprives the originator of the product ofthe advertising value of its name and the goodwill that otherwise would stem from public knowledge of the true source of the product.
TonyRush wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 6:27 pm Plus, if they're really intending on fighting with Lucasfilm, I think they may have muddied the waters of their argument by selling an unbranded version of the bag in question on their own website.
No argument there!
TonyRush
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by TonyRush »

Castor, thanks for that additional information! It definitely clarifies.

Thanks!
Tony
User avatar
Castor Dioscuri
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Interesting Frost River Lucasfilm Lawsuit

Post by Castor Dioscuri »

:TOH:
Post Reply