REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Need help finding an Indy Gun, want to discuss film used guns...

Moderator: Cajunkraut

Post Reply
User avatar
chenricy
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:24 pm
Location: Delray Beach, Florida

REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by chenricy »

User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44486
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Michaelson »

I enjoyed that! Thanks! :TOH:

Regard! Michaelson
User avatar
chenricy
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:24 pm
Location: Delray Beach, Florida

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by chenricy »

Michaelson wrote:I enjoyed that! Thanks! :TOH:

Regard! Michaelson
always cool to see an indirect Indy reference :lol:
User avatar
Dangerfreak
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 6:59 am
Location: Isle of Wight, Southern England

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Dangerfreak »

That was informative, thank you. They both seem to be highly regarded revolvers by gun enthusiasts and I enjoyed seeing them compared. I've always had an interest in military history and enjoy learning about historic weapons. Thanks for sharing.
User avatar
chenricy
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:24 pm
Location: Delray Beach, Florida

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by chenricy »

Dangerfreak wrote:That was informative, thank you. They both seem to be highly regarded revolvers by gun enthusiasts and I enjoyed seeing them compared. I've always had an interest in military history and enjoy learning about historic weapons. Thanks for sharing.
Me too man. I do own the S&W so I was happy it kinda won, but of course I'd love to have the Webley too.
User avatar
Dangerfreak
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 6:59 am
Location: Isle of Wight, Southern England

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Dangerfreak »

chenricy wrote:
Dangerfreak wrote:That was informative, thank you. They both seem to be highly regarded revolvers by gun enthusiasts and I enjoyed seeing them compared. I've always had an interest in military history and enjoy learning about historic weapons. Thanks for sharing.
Me too man. I do own the S&W so I was happy it kinda won, but of course I'd love to have the Webley too.
They're both iconic weapons aren't they, and their connection with the Great War only adds to that.

Sent from my XT1700 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Tinplatejeff
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 191
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:06 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Tinplatejeff »

Cool video, thanks for posting it.

:H:
Howard Weinstein
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:06 am
Location: Maryland, USA
Contact:

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Howard Weinstein »

To complete his recently gathered Indy gear, my friend spared no expense -- he bought a real 1912 S & W!
(He shoots as a hobby, and had long wanted a WWI period revolver, so this gave him a good excuse.)
User avatar
chenricy
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:24 pm
Location: Delray Beach, Florida

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by chenricy »

Howard Weinstein wrote:To complete his recently gathered Indy gear, my friend spared no expense -- he bought a real 1912 S & W!
(He shoots as a hobby, and had long wanted a WWI period revolver, so this gave him a good excuse.)
That's awesome, did the same myself :)

Now comes the most important question: did he cut the barrel??
User avatar
Indiana Jeff
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10212
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:59 am
Location: TX Panhandle

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Indiana Jeff »

Thanks for sharing. It's great to see some actual live firing of these guns and not just being used as holster stuffers.


Regards,

Indiana Jeff
Howard Weinstein
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:06 am
Location: Maryland, USA
Contact:

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Howard Weinstein »

chenricy wrote:
Howard Weinstein wrote:To complete his recently gathered Indy gear, my friend spared no expense -- he bought a real 1912 S & W!
(He shoots as a hobby, and had long wanted a WWI period revolver, so this gave him a good excuse.)
That's awesome, did the same myself :)

Now comes the most important question: did he cut the barrel??
No, he didn't. And -- my mistake -- it's made by Colt, though apparently the same as a S & W. Here's the gun:

Image

My friend's details/comments about the gun: "It dates to 1920 based on the serial number. And I got a really good price [$599]. Purists will say that the barrel is too long and was made by Colt, not Smith and Wesson, but both companies made the gun for the US government... I have wanted a WW I era revolver for my collection anyway. This one is in excellent condition save for a couple scratches a past owner made... For the purists, all I can say is that Indy had several different revolvers in Raiders depending on what the prop department pulled out. I never had noticed the difference until I went to the Indy Gear site."
User avatar
chenricy
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:24 pm
Location: Delray Beach, Florida

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by chenricy »

#### pretty! I have the m1917 which is the same as the movie and I still haven't cut the barrel yet. Since its over a hundred years old I still don't have the heart to cut it. Yet...
micsteam
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:33 am
Location: South Florida

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by micsteam »

There's two US made revolvers produced in quantity for WWI, both were made for civilian and police/government use with their own designations ( Colt New Model/S&W Hand Ejector) and then their military designation which was M1917 ... the distinction was M1917 Colt and M1917 S&W both in .45 cal. with 5 1/2" barrels . Originally the US military sidearm was the Colt 1911 .45 automatic at the beginning of US involvement in WWI but production could not keep up ( tooling/assembly was more complicated), therefore, since the US had already been supplying the British .45 Colt and S&W( also in British .455 Eley which was the round used in their Webleys and large frame Enfields) revolvers through lend lease they began issuing them in majority to US troops in all services. The majority of these revolvers were made to take .45 cal rim cartridges but since manufacturing was set up to make .45 auto rim ( these days .45 ACP Automatic Colt Pistol) machinists/armorers/etc. machined down the cylinders to take " half moon" clips. These half moon clips would accept three .45 ACP rounds, essentially early speed loaders, so that the Colt and S&W revolvers would accept rimless cartridges to fire. :TOH:
User avatar
chenricy
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:24 pm
Location: Delray Beach, Florida

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by chenricy »

micsteam wrote:There's two US made revolvers produced in quantity for WWI, both were made for civilian and police/government use with their own designations ( Colt New Model/S&W Hand Ejector) and then their military designation which was M1917 ... the distinction was M1917 Colt and M1917 S&W both in .45 cal. with 5 1/2" barrels . Originally the US military sidearm was the Colt 1911 .45 automatic at the beginning of US involvement in WWI but production could not keep up ( tooling/assembly was more complicated), therefore, since the US had already been supplying the British .45 Colt and S&W( also in British .455 Eley which was the round used in their Webleys and large frame Enfields) revolvers through lend lease they began issuing them in majority to US troops in all services. The majority of these revolvers were made to take .45 cal rim cartridges but since manufacturing was set up to make .45 auto rim ( these days .45 ACP Automatic Colt Pistol) machinists/armorers/etc. machined down the cylinders to take " half moon" clips. These half moon clips would accept three .45 ACP rounds, essentially early speed loaders, so that the Colt and S&W revolvers would accept rimless cartridges to fire. :TOH:
See this, this is why i come to this site!! Thank you for that dude that was awesome to find out. Mine takes those darn half moon clips and i haaaaate them. Such a pain to get the bullets in them... ](*,)
Parttimeteacher
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:22 am

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Parttimeteacher »

A little tip. Any Webleys that are modified to take 45 acp are not safe to shoot. 45 acp has too much pressure for the Webleys that are designed to take .455 Webley rounds. Some people get around this by light-loading their own 45's to safe pressures.

I prefer the Smith and Wesson M1917 myself.
Parttimeteacher
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:22 am

Re: REVOLVER SHOWDOWN S&W vs WEBLEY!

Post by Parttimeteacher »

Also, the S&W Classics line had 2 model 22s. One was the 1917 with 5 1/2" barrel and lanyard ring. The other is a 4" model 1950 without a lanyard ring. Both 45 acp. Modern tech and construction in a classic style revolver. I have one of each and I highly recommend either.
Post Reply