Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Discuss all of the intricacies of the jacket in full detail

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg

Post Reply
User avatar
steerpike
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:17 am
Location: Italy

Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by steerpike »

Probably well discussed in the past, but I was curious to know something more specific about the originals. Who knows the exact differences in lenght from the two movies?

ImageImage

:TOH:
User avatar
Texan Scott
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 5838
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:55 am
Location: A felt body at rest tends to stay at rest. Sieze the day!
Contact:

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by Texan Scott »

The most important thing is how it fits on you. Some like their jackets to be shortened somewhat, while others may prefer the jacket to be slightly longer for everyday wear. I noticed that there appeared to be differences between the Raiders and LC jackets, as I would need a 25 1/2" BL for the Raiders jacket, and around 27" BL for the LC jacket. Curious, I posed this sort of question to the man, and here is what he said:

"Yes it is a different pattern.
The shoulders also are more sloped on the crusade
Wear and be happy
Cheers
Peter"

So you or others might take that into consideration when placing a future order. The patterns are different but the features are similiar. Typically, the LC yoke is wider, as are the arm holes, so that means that the sleeves are usually wider. Because the arm holes are wider, the jacket tends to ride up more than the Raiders jacket, when the arms are lifted. If you really like that pattern, you can compensate for this idiosyncrasy by requesting RoLA sleeves and gussets, for instance. Though not entirely SA, this will give you a better range of motion. Again, I think it more important to get the best fit for you. fyi. ;)
User avatar
Holt
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 14466
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by Holt »

I think there is about 2 or 2.5'' lenght difference between the two.

Nowak copied the original raiders which measured about 23.5'' backlength the Lc's where 25.5'' or 26'' maby 26.5''
User avatar
Forrest For the Trees
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:01 am
Location: Okay, it's not really the South... it's Texas

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by Forrest For the Trees »

In some scenes, the LC jacket appears to be pretty short, like the Raiders jacket. Maybe a better way to think about it personally, is where should the back length end when compared to your pants (assuming your belt line is around your waist properly)? It would appear the proper back length is just above or along the top edge of the back pocket flaps, IMO.
User avatar
nicktheguy
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 1834
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by nicktheguy »

Then again it will take into consideration if we are talking natural waist or commonly worn pant area. ;)
User avatar
Forrest For the Trees
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:01 am
Location: Okay, it's not really the South... it's Texas

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by Forrest For the Trees »

nicktheguy wrote:Then again it will take into consideration if we are talking natural waist or commonly worn pant area. ;)
Sure, but this is personal preference. But, you're right, either way, natural waist, or a bit lower, will make quite a difference when looking at proper back length for an Indy jacket.

I'm 5' 10," and a 25" back length is about perfect as it sits just at the tops of the back pockets of my jeans.
CM
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by CM »

Holt wrote:I think there is about 2 or 2.5'' lenght difference between the two.

Nowak copied the original raiders which measured about 23.5'' backlength the Lc's where 25.5'' or 26'' maby 26.5''
That's a good point. Do we know for certain that all the Raiders jackets were cut at 23.5 - or just the one given to TN?

It's funny but to me all the Indy jackets look about the same length - depending on the shot. It's the difference in the leather which catches my eye - the stiffness of LC and CS, the softness of Raiders, the wrinkling and wear in the ToD.
User avatar
Forrest For the Trees
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:01 am
Location: Okay, it's not really the South... it's Texas

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by Forrest For the Trees »

It looks almost as short as the Raiders jacket (to me) in this shot:
http://www.theraider.net/showimage.php? ... ts/292.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Bruce Wayne
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1304
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:56 pm
Location: Gotham City by way of Hoosierville 46304

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by Bruce Wayne »

I say the LC jacket is shorter simply because Ford is older so his pants are naturally going to be hiked up more...
WConly
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1716
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 2:20 am
Location: Topeka, Kansas

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by WConly »

CM wrote:
Holt wrote:I think there is about 2 or 2.5'' lenght difference between the two.

Nowak copied the original raiders which measured about 23.5'' backlength the Lc's where 25.5'' or 26'' maby 26.5''
That's a good point. Do we know for certain that all the Raiders jackets were cut at 23.5 - or just the one given to TN?

It's funny but to me all the Indy jackets look about the same length - depending on the shot. It's the difference in the leather which catches my eye - the stiffness of LC and CS, the softness of Raiders, the wrinkling and wear in the ToD.


This is exactly how I have always viewed it as well. There are a great deal of variables involved here when you think about it. I would imagine that just like hats -- no two exactly being perfectly idendtical in size -- the same would also be true with jackets -- custom made or not. Variances do occur. W>
Taco-Bot
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:33 pm

Re: Raiders vs LC Back Lenght

Post by Taco-Bot »

CM wrote:It's funny but to me all the Indy jackets look about the same length - depending on the shot. It's the difference in the leather which catches my eye - the stiffness of LC and CS, the softness of Raiders, the wrinkling and wear in the ToD.
Am I correct in thinking that the shoulders are really wide on the Temple of Doom jacket?
Post Reply