I got this one last week.
well done wested!
The only problem is that it is 1,5 inch too short
![Brick wall ](*,)](./images/smilies/Indy_wall.gif)
Time to order a new one.......
![Eh? :-s](./images/smilies/Indy_eh.gif)
Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg
Interesting. I have never had that experience myself over 25 years and dozens of leather jackets. I have had jackets that seem to stretch in the sleeves a couple of times, but that's another story.Michaelson wrote:You're a rare bird if you haven't, VP. You must have received a jacket with correct sleeve length from the 'get-go', as ALL jacket sleeves 'ride up', no exceptions. This is no 'opinion' or 'theory', just plain fact.
It occurs at the elbow in the leather gathering due to the bend of your elbow. All jackets will lose up to an inch in original/new length in that location once broken in...that is, unless you never bend your arms.![]()
Ask any tailor/jacket maker. They'll tell you the same thing.
Regards! Michaelson
I also have never experienced any significant ride-up in any of my leather jackets...CM wrote:Interesting. I have never had that experience myself over 25 years and dozens of leather jackets. I have had jackets that seem to stretch in the sleeves a couple of times, but that's another story.
Interesting as well. I've owned dozens of leather jackets for over 36 years+, and they have ALL done it, by every manufacturer and every type hide imaginable but 'roo (that's one I never got hold of before they discontinued import).CM wrote:Interesting. I have never had that experience myself over 25 years and dozens of leather jackets.
Thickness of the leather, type of leather, etc.djd wrote:I think it's probably more dependent on the thickness of the leather. Thin leather tends to bunch up a bit more- motorcycle jackets never bunch up because the leather is much too thick for those creases to develop. The Raiders look seems to work best with thin leather...
Yepp thats me the long-sleeved manIndiana Holt wrote:29'' sleeves![]()
no wonder you feel that those sleeves on your jacket are short. you dont exactly have short arms if you need 29'' sleeves
There is something different looking about the sleeve attachment to the body of the jacket I think. Not sure tehy are higher on the shoulder.Rudolf wrote:Michaelson , I know that the sleeves tend to be slightly curly on my other jackets they have been 0.5 inch shorter not more
the strange thing about this jacket was that the shoulders were a little higher which I think is good but it made the sleeves shorter than usual.
RCSignals ,I think there are better shoulders that are tighter back and a little higher that allows the shoulder seam push up a bit and make it almost looks like shoulder pads (almost ),and a tighter in this case only 19 inch Yoke seam.
Tundrarider, yes I like a bit shorter sleeves, it´s a custom
and I will probably not kep it, has ordered a new today with 29 inch sleeves an a slightly longer body also.
I really like your nowak ,how long is it in the body and sleeves? I think we are about the same length 6,5..
Re-read my original post. I said 'up to 1 inch'.Rudolf wrote:Michaelson , I know that the sleeves tend to be slightly curly on my other jackets they have been 0.5 inch shorter not more
Hmm?( you've experienced the regular 'ride up' in the sleeves, those sleeve cuffs will be up around your elbows!)Michaelson wrote:Re-read my original post. I said 'up to 1 inch'.Rudolf wrote:Michaelson , I know that the sleeves tend to be slightly curly on my other jackets they have been 0.5 inch shorter not more
.05 inch is within that statement.![]()
Regards! Michaelson
its a deeper collar.that_dog wrote:Something is amiss on those measurements, as there is no way there is a 6.5 inch disparity between the sleeve and front lengths. My TN has a 24" front with 26.5" sleeves and that 2.5" difference is just about spot on (and is the same as the original jacket, which has a 23" front with 25.5" sleeves).
### then it's true, I have monkey armsTundrarider wrote:Here are the measurements:From the bottom of the collar stand to the bottom of the JACKET BACK is 26”Rudolf wrote:I really like your nowak ,how long is it in the body and sleeves? I think we are about the same length 6,5..
From the bottom of the collar stand to the bottom of the JACKET FRONT is 24” (Along the zipper edge.)
From the point where the yoke meets the collar stand (at the neck) to the bottom of the JACKET FRONT is 27”
Sleeve length from the top of the yoke (where it meets the sleeve) to the cuff: 26"
If your arm length is truly 27 1/2 " then 29" will probably be just right.
Interesting about the body measurement comparisons: Mine appears to be 3 " longer at the zipper and 4 " longer from the yoke to the bottom of the jacket front.![]()
Thanks for the compliment.![]()
Michael
Michaelson wrote:Interesting as well. I've owned dozens of leather jackets for over 36 years+, and they have ALL done it, by every manufacturer and every type hide imaginable but 'roo (that's one I never got hold of before they discontinued import).CM wrote:Interesting. I have never had that experience myself over 25 years and dozens of leather jackets.![]()
Are you saying that every jacket you've owned and worn, there are no wrinkles what so ever at your elbow? For every wrinkle formed in a jacket elbow, that is length taken away from the end of the sleeve. That is 'ride up'.
Personally I've never EVER seen a used/worn leather jacket that had no elbow wrinkles formed from wear. That would be interesting to see.
If anyone is familiar with the old program 'Are You Being Served', that was the running gag, as it is an industry standard. ANYTHING a customer tried on at Grace Brothers that was too long (and some of the examples were hilarious...sleeves 4 to 5 inches too long and the like) was covered with the standard answer "don't worry sir/madam....it will ride up with wear...."![]()
Regards! Michaelson
.05 inch!?! Now THAT's nit-pickey!Michaelson wrote:Re-read my original post. I said 'up to 1 inch'.Rudolf wrote:Michaelson , I know that the sleeves tend to be slightly curly on my other jackets they have been 0.5 inch shorter not more
.05 inch is within that statement.![]()
Regards! Michaelson
I've worked it out then; my arms must be shrinking...Michaelson wrote:Well, consider this...unless your jacket sleeves are making new material every time you bend your arms, that material has to be coming from somewhere to create those wrinkles. That 'somewhere' is the cuff end of your sleeves.![]()
Regards! Michaelson
Got a laugh here!CM wrote: "I'm free, Captain Peacock..."
CM wrote:I've worked it out then; my arms must be shrinking...Michaelson wrote:Well, consider this...unless your jacket sleeves are making new material every time you bend your arms, that material has to be coming from somewhere to create those wrinkles. That 'somewhere' is the cuff end of your sleeves.![]()
Regards! Michaelson
Kt Templar wrote:Sorry Rudolf please don't take his the wrong way, it think that jacket is just too tight and short for you.
IMO it needs a little more room in the chest and shoulder, more length in the body, longer sleeves and wider sleeves at that. It actually gives the impression of being about a size too small for you.
I like the pocket proportions and the larger collar diameter.