Some TN shrunken lamb pics (even MORE)

whiskyman · Post by **whiskyman** » Sun May 31, 2009 10:43 am

I must be mad starting another thread - but I really liked these pics and thought I'd share them with all those fellow fans of shrunken lamb. Taken today, it was too hot for 747. Antipodians take note, I am in no way complaining in this thread - and especially for Holt, I've even smiling!

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y285/p ... CN0541.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y285/p ... CN0532.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y285/p ... CN0529.jpg

gwyddion · Post by **gwyddion** » Sun May 31, 2009 11:40 am

I still realy like the way your jacket looks Whisky. Great looking jacket!

Oh, and nice parot you've got there. What is it?

Regards, Geert

Post by **Holt** » Sun May 31, 2009 1:34 pm

Haha. its so obvious what your thinking in the 4th close up picture.

great pictures Nick.

bests
Holt

Raider S · Post by **Raider S** » Sun May 31, 2009 2:43 pm

For those looking for an alternative to the lamb, I'd say the 747 cowhide is an outstanding choice that captures some of the texture and depth of the shrunken lamb. Mine must be the nicest leather I've had my hands on.

RCSignals · Post by **RCSignals** » Sun May 31, 2009 3:22 pm

It really looks great on you Whiskyman. Looks like it fits well, just keep wearing it.

You found it to be OK on a hotter day?

crismans · Post by **crismans** » Sun May 31, 2009 5:02 pm

Terrific looking jacket. The leather looks superb and the fit is outstanding.

Yojimbo Jones · Post by **Yojimbo Jones** » Sun May 31, 2009 5:31 pm

Indiana Holt wrote:Haha. its so obvious what your thinking in the 4th close up picture.Holt

Yeah - "Don't try anything, birdy"

Nice jacket, man! Fits you fine - don't go doing anything crazy like selling it, now, will you?

spenyk · Post by **spenyk** » Sun May 31, 2009 6:43 pm

What kind of hat is that?

PSBIndy · Post by **PSBIndy** » Sun May 31, 2009 8:56 pm

How much for the bird?

bigrex · Post by **bigrex** » Sun May 31, 2009 9:01 pm

If you're mad it's in a good way, never can get enough of quality gear pics.

whiskyman · Post by **whiskyman** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:00 am

That's not my parrot - i found it sitting ona deckchair so it was only a brief acquaintance.

A couple more pics from today - first time I've gone hiking in gear in about 4 years!! Was a lot of fun.

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:04 am

I've probably said this a few times about various jackets over the past year, but right now, that is the best and most accurate
Raiders jacket reproduction I have seen. Simply superb, and it's nice seeing pictures of it worn in it's 'natural habitat'.

whiskyman · Post by **whiskyman** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:29 pm

If I'd known how few people I was going to meet I would've taken a bullwhip along as well.
I think outdoor pics are the best when it comes to photographing jackets, hats etc..

Baldwyn · Post by **Baldwyn** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:47 pm

Fantastic pictures, thanks Whiskyman. That jacket is definitely one of my favourite shrunken lamb specimens!

Post by **Holt** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:26 pm

well, It looks like you got the spirit back Nick. Welcome

would you mind making the last pics links due the 6 pics per thread rule?

BTW, lamb is the way to go for a Raiders jacket. not goat, cow, horse. Not even soft goat from wested when I think about it...even though I have it...

dont get me wrong, I love the other hides, but for the acurrate Raiders look it must be lambskin..... The pictures proove it.

Zendragon · Post by **Zendragon** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:01 pm

This jacket really looks great in photos. It really looks the part.

PLATON · Post by **PLATON** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:30 am

Whiskyman,
What size you wear? Ford's size?

Post by **Holt** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:33 am

why?

is this about the length again? then please dont start anything, Im burned out about this issue....

PLATON · Post by **PLATON** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:50 am

No no, it's not about the length.
Length is over.

agent5 · Post by **agent5** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:54 am

don't go doing anything crazy like selling it, now, will you?

I don't think this is a promise he can make even if he wanted to. From past experiences I don't think he has control over this issue. It just ends up happening.

Yojimbo Jones · Post by **Yojimbo Jones** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:15 am

WM, that is an AWESOME jacket.

whiskyman · Post by **whiskyman** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:40 pm

PLATON wrote:Whiskyman,
What size you wear? Ford's size?

When I originally gave Tony a few measurements and a couple of pics, he said my jacket would be the same size as Ford's. I think that's probably true - when I tried on the TOD jacket at MBA, it fit me perfectly!

Post by **Michaelson** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:41 pm

Meaning you're Ford's size....25 years ago.

Regards! Michaelson

whiskyman · Post by **whiskyman** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:58 pm

I think he was in better shape though!!!!

RCSignals · Post by **RCSignals** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:20 pm

Michaelson wrote:Meaning you're Ford's size....25 years ago.

Regards! Michaelson

Ah, but based on Ford's CS jacket size, he hasn't changed much if at all.

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:19 am

RCSignals wrote:
Michaelson wrote:Meaning you're Ford's size....25 years ago.

Regards! Michaelson
Ah, but based on Ford's CS jacket size, he hasn't changed much if at all.

Between ToD (the jacket whiskey tried on at Noel Howards was from TofD, and the one whiskey said fit perfectly) and CS, Ford went from a size 42 to a size 44.

So, yes, Ford has changed....just like the rest of us as we've aged.

Regards! Michaelson

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:24 am

I thought Ford was a size 40 in Crystal Skull?

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:28 am

Nope. Raiders.

Regards! Michaelson

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:32 am

Yet Tony tells us his jackets front chest measurement was 22". That makes it a size 40. I'm sure RC can confirm this.
In fact, I recall RC posting that some might find it strange that the chest measurement for the Raiders jacket Tony had was 22.5, larger
than the 22 inches of the CS jacket.
Where did this idea of it being a 44 come from? Unless you're using the odd notion that 2x22 inches gives you a size 44?
A skin-tight 44, sure...

Dutch_jones · Post by **Dutch_jones** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:33 am

Michaelson wrote:Nope. Raiders.

Regards! Michaelson

Yep and 42 in TOD because he had to bulk up for the shirtless scenes !

Satipo · Post by **Satipo** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:40 am

I don't think you even need measurements to see that Ford is MUCH stockier now than in his Raiders and TOD days.

Dutch_jones · Post by **Dutch_jones** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:50 am

Satipo wrote:I don't think you even need measurements to see that Ford is MUCH stockier now than in his Raiders and TOD days.

Very true, this pic proves it

This shows how buffed his chest looks which IMO is much bigger than in TOD.
http://macleans.files.wordpress.com/200 ... -01816.jpg

he seems to be in very good shape for someone aged 67 ? He looks very old though but buffed up, he could be a Wrestler !
http://bauergriffinonline.com/2007/12/0 ... 120407.jpg

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:52 am

I remember in years past Lee Keppler telling me in all his studies and research just how pleased he was to own and wear jackets that were the exact same size that Ford wore in Raiders. Lee wears size 40.

Regards! Michaelson

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:56 am

Whatever guys.

I still say it was a size 40, as Tony's measurements suggest.
I'm happy to be proven wrong though. And pics of a 'buff' Ford don't tell us his jacket size.

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:06 am

In fact now that I think of it, forget trying to prove me wrong.
I've ordered second a Crystal Skull jacket from Tony, this time slightly larger in the shoulders, and half an inch off the chest.
It's pretty much exactly the specs on Tony's website, minus an inch of the sleeves.
Going over the specs with me over the phone, Tony said 'So, we're going with Ford's measurements this time, ok'.
These measurements included the 22 inch front chest measurement. 22 inches x 2 = 44 inches.
This is standard sizing for a size 40 jacket with 4 inches of room. Don't be fooled by the 44.
It's a size 40 folks. Ford isn't getting bigger, he's 60+, he's shrinking. He is in great shape though, granted.
Pics can be deceiving.

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:08 am

Speaking for myself, kevin, I'm not going by photos.

Not sure about your 'chart', but I just pulled my G&B Expedition out of my closet this very minute. It measures 22 inches side to side front, 22 inches side to side back. 22 x 2= 44. It's marked size 44T.

I pulled my U. S. Wings VIP out. 22 inches front. 22 inches back, 22 x 2 =44. Their chart marks their 'L' to fit size 44-46.

I just pulled my Wested cloth Raiders out. 22 inches front. 22 inches back. 22 x 2 = 44. It's marked 44.

So, there's 3 manufacturers who match your measurements, and NONE of them come up with a size 40. Two of the jackets are custom, one OTR.

There's no way in the WORLD I can get my carcass in a size 40....well, maybe my leg, but something seems amiss in your chart.

Regards! Michaelson

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:11 am

Well, what are you going by then? What evidence do you have that it's a size 44, when the measurments identify it as a size 40?
Sorry to keep going on about this, but it's had me baffled for ages every time the size of the CS is referred to as a 44...
Please enlighten me, I don't claim to know everything, and I'm humble enough to admit I'm wrong, when I'm wrong.

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:13 am

Read my addition in my post above.

Thoughts?

Just to be clear, I'm not try to prove you right OR wrong. I honestly don't care one way or the other. If that's your contention, so be it...but I do want to point out to you that no other company we deal with seems to go by the chart you're using in determining size.

Regards! Michaelson

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:31 am

Well, I didn't mention any 'chart'...

However, I can see where we're getting confused here. I think several members had a similar discussion way back in the Nowak owners
thread months ago. Sizing confusion.
I think many will agree that a size 40 jacket is for someone with a 40 inch chest.
But it's not going to be exactly 40 inches around, that would make it very tight. Room is added, usually 2+ inches, making 4 or so inches of room.
So, my jacket, and Ford's, would be 22 inches from armpit to armpit, (where the chest measurement is supposed to be taken).
20 inches for the half-chest measurement, plus 2 inches for room. Multiply that by two and of course you get a jacket that is 44 inches around
the chest.
However, if you don't call a jacket that has an armpit to armpit (front chest) measurement of 22 inches a size 40, then fair enough. Call it whatever you want, but it is a size 40.
On a related note, my G&B Expedition, size 40, is large around the chest. Laid flat, armpit to armpit it's about 23.5 inches, making it closer to a 42.
Don't many say that G&B make their jackets slightly larger?
It's quite loose around the chest. Very comfortable though.
I'm getting sick of typing 'measurement', so I'm done. Thanks for the discussion Michaelson! TOH

Dutch_jones · Post by **Dutch_jones** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:45 am

Look kevin, if Ford was a size 40, 30 years ago and he is more buffed now, that means he is not a size 40 ! and a 44 sounds much more plausible then a 40.

Raider S · Post by **Raider S** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:52 am

I can see the headline: Crazed Fans Mob Harrison Ford With Tape Measure!

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:56 am

It has been stated that the Raiders jacket Tony had has a chest measurement of 22.5 inches. It is commonly accepted that this jacket is a size 40.
The jacket Tony made for Ford in Crystal Skull has a chest measurement of 22 inches. It is commonly accepted by me that is it crazy to say that a
jacket with a smaller chest measurement than a size 40 is actually a size 44.
Is that clear enough?
I know Ford is in great shape. A 40 inch chest, like mine, is not exactly small, folks, especially for a fellow of Harrison's age.
I work out quite a bit, and I'm a very similar shape to Ford in those last few pics. And I wear a 40R.
And I just went and typed 'measurement' three more times. I always miss the second 'e'.

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:00 am

I've heard that possibility mentioned before, Raider....

I understand where youre coming from, kevin, and you're right, this comes up every 6-8 months or so, and I believe we all walk away just as confused as when we walked in.

Where's FLATHEAD when you need him? He has a better handle on this than I do.

As I've always understood things, you include the 4 inches in the size, NOT subtract it. So, if you have a 40 inch chest with 4 inches of play added, it's a size 44 to the industry, not a size 40. My jackets seem to hold true to that 'theory', and they're made by manufacturers from around the world.

(Oh, and I didn't mean to come across 'hard edged' when I said 'I didn't care'. It's just in the big picture, it's one of those things that really doesn't matter between friends when it comes right down to it. TOH )

Regards! Michaelson

Kevin Anderson · Post by **Kevin Anderson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:06 am

No hard feelings whatsoever, Michaelson, and I enjoy the debate when it's friendly and civil.
It's something I wanted to get to the bottom of, but you're right, it's not exactly critical.
I think it comes down to ones definition of sizes, and we know that changes from continent to continent, and manufacturer to manufacturer.
I will still maintain it's a 40, but I respect the opinion that it is a 44.
Sorry to Whiskeyman for the hijack; back to looking at pictures of his wonderful jacket. And the parrot!
P.S. 'manufacturer' is almost as annoying for me to type as 'measurement'!

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:08 am

Kevin Anderson wrote:P.S. 'manufacturer' is almost as annoying for me to type as 'measurement'!

Do you mess that word up too! I had to re-type it twice before it looked right to me!

Agreed....and now back to your regularily scheduled program...already in progress......

HIGH regards! Michaelson

Satipo · Post by **Satipo** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:10 am

I see what you're saying about standard jacket sizes and their measurements, Kevin. Could it be possible that Tony's CS jacket measurements for Ford have become a little confused somewhere along the line? I'm a well-built 40R myself, but I honestly wouldn't compare my appearance to a T-shirted Ford as he appears now.

Michaelson wrote:Agreed....and now back to your regularily scheduled program...already in progress......

Sorry, didn't see this. Ignore my question.

Post by **Holt** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:38 am

Hey Mark. I am so surprized by these measurements. like I was a while ago when we spoke about the exact same thing in an other thread.

this jacket here is a 44 80's cut.

3 of my 44 jackets measured this.This is why I need to have wested downsize the jacket for me....

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g182/ ... wested.jpg

Post by **Michaelson** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:45 am

Yep, something was DEFINITELY awry in your jackets, that's for sure!

Regards! Michaelson

Dutch_jones · Post by **Dutch_jones** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:49 am

Indiana Holt wrote:Hey Mark. I am so surprized by these measurements. like I was a while ago when we spoke about the exact same thing in an other thread.

this jacket here is a 44 80's cut.

3 of my 44 jackets measured this.This is why I need to have wested downsize the jacket for me....

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g182/ ... wested.jpg

Holt, I checked the jacket I bought from you and it measures 21" across!
also a 44

Post by **Holt** » Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:07 pm

Im so lost cuz, I spoke to other people with UK made 44's and they measure 24 to 25'' across.same as mine...

and I spoke to a few persons who have Uk made 42's and they measure 23'' across.....

something really weird is going on thats for sure.....