Pics of new Wested Raiders Custom

Discuss all of the intricacies of the jacket in full detail

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg

Post Reply
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Pics of new Wested Raiders Custom

Post by indy1936 »

Received this right at the end of December. It is a custom 46L. The yoke is much smaller and higher than on my previous three raiders jackets. Which looks great when wearing it. It measures at least 1 inch higher. I swapped out the rectangular sliders for black tri-glides so that the straps will face the back panel. I didn't specify the inside pocket, collar/storm flap placement or yoke size but they all came out great. My only gripes would be the back panel not extending all the way out and the pockets being just a tad small (making it harder to fit my hands inside the side warmers). I think on larger jackets it is hard to find a piece of leather big enough to cover the entire back panel. Best jacket I've received yet! I'm happy with it!

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Post by Raider S »

Looks really nice. Pockets do seem small, but look good.
User avatar
Holt
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 14456
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

the jacket looks good,and the hide will last forever,just wait until it relaxes.

but to give you the truth.I would send it back to wested and let them do bigger pockets on the jakcet.

the pockets will tear since you must force your hands into the handwarmers.send it back now so you wont regret it later.

and I would let them instal some new buckles instead of those blueish ones.

the back panel looks great and so does the yolk versus sleeve seam.

just my2cents.

Holt
RCSignals
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3665
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:32 pm
Location: Twin Galaxies

Post by RCSignals »

It looks nice. I agree with Holt about the pockets. It almost looks like they are ToD jacket sized pockets
User avatar
Holt
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 14456
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

also the jacket being a 46 Long will make them look even smaller.

send it back,they will tear eventually


what size are the pockets?


I did this,see the difference.the one on the left is more suited for the jacket


Image
Last edited by Holt on Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Post by Raider S »

Thought you had a TOD. I think they put TOD size pockets on yours by mistake or something.
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

Thanks for the input. The pockets do seem a bit small i think they are 6" x 7". The buckles are black in person but showed up blue in the photos for some reason.
User avatar
Texas Raider
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 1820
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:47 am
Location: Back in Texas, AGAIN! (but still under my hat)

Post by Texas Raider »

Man, I can't believe that Wested doesn't recognize the need to make the pockets proportionate to the specific size jacket! That jacket is a 46,,that's pretty big,,the pockets need to be MUCH bigger to be to scale with the jacket.

TR
User avatar
PSBIndy
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 838
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Post by PSBIndy »

Also one pocket looks quite bigger than the other. Send it back.
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

The photo with the 1 bigger pocket was showing how a larger pocket would look. It was edited. :)
Last edited by indy1936 on Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Holt
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 14456
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

PSBIndy wrote:Also one pocket looks quite bigger than the other. Send it back.
:lol:

and what is that big red ugly line on the jacket,I mean what is that all about? thats not SA

:lol:
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

:)
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

Here's a question. How much taper should the back panel have from top to bottom? This seems to have more taper than previous jackets. It seems to look better when wearing it though.
User avatar
Browncoat
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:02 pm
Location: California

Post by Browncoat »

I actually like the taper. It probably looks really good if it matches the taper of your back especially with the straps pulled for a custom fit.

The pockets do look like ToD pockets.

I'd like to see a Wested with Tony's 6.5 x 8 pockets myself. I think larger pockets and fuller cut sleeves would really improve the Wested pattern.
User avatar
Texas Raider
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 1820
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:47 am
Location: Back in Texas, AGAIN! (but still under my hat)

Post by Texas Raider »

Taper should be there on back panel.

TR
RCSignals
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3665
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:32 pm
Location: Twin Galaxies

Post by RCSignals »

PSBIndy wrote:Also one pocket looks quite bigger than the other. Send it back.
:lol: that Holt
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

Browncoat wrote:I actually like the taper. It probably looks really good if it matches the taper of your back especially with the straps pulled for a custom fit.

The pockets do look like ToD pockets.

I'd like to see a Wested with Tony's 6.5 x 8 pockets myself. I think larger pockets and fuller cut sleeves would really improve the Wested pattern.
My other 3 Westeds (98, 03, 04) have the 6.5 x 8 pockets. Weird how they are smaller this time. I did ask for the scalloped flaps so maybe they somehow assumed smaller pockets based on someone elses specs. I think this jacket actually has tighter cut sleeves which worked out ok this time as my last jacket was a little baggy in the sleeves near the wrist.
User avatar
PSBIndy
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 838
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Post by PSBIndy »

indy1936 wrote:The photo with the 1 bigger pocket was showing how a larger pocket would look. It was edited. :)
Send it back anyways, it's cursed. :)
User avatar
bigrex
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1188
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:21 pm
Location: Alfecca Meridiana

Post by bigrex »

PSBIndy wrote:
indy1936 wrote:The photo with the 1 bigger pocket was showing how a larger pocket would look. It was edited. :)
Send it back anyways, it's cursed. :)
or haunted. :shock:
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

Now I'm spooked! :anxious:
User avatar
crismans
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: southeast KY

Post by crismans »

I wouldn't think the scalloped pocket flaps would have anything to do with the size (but what do I know?). If the pockets are too small for you to comfortably put your hands in without the risk of tearing, I'd send it back for bigger pockets. If not, you'll never be totally happy with it and end up getting another one with bigger pockets (or that's what I'd do anyway :[ ).
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

crismans wrote:I wouldn't think the scalloped pocket flaps would have anything to do with the size (but what do I know?). If the pockets are too small for you to comfortably put your hands in without the risk of tearing, I'd send it back for bigger pockets. If not, you'll never be totally happy with it and end up getting another one with bigger pockets (or that's what I'd do anyway :[ ).
I was thinking maybe they thought I wanted Platon's pockets? The smaller pockets popped up in this thread also: http://indygear.com/cow/viewtopic.php?t=32710
Indywannabe
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:41 am
Location: Vasteras, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Indywannabe »

A question:

Did you request the yoke seam to be 1 inch higher than the armseam or did it come this way?
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

Requested. It looks like they just shrank the size of the yoke which raised the seam by about 1" - 2". The arm seams seem to be positioned the same as in my other jackets.
User avatar
sebas
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 190
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 7:15 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post by sebas »

Great-looking jacket, indy1936. I love the grain and color. Having said that, those cargo pockets indeed are tiny. Temple of Doomish. A bit of a hybrid jacket, I suppose.
Cheers.
CM
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by CM »

Browncoat wrote:

I'd like to see a Wested with Tony's 6.5 x 8 pockets myself. I think larger pockets and fuller cut sleeves would really improve the Wested pattern.
Really? In the past the biggest problem with Wested is that the pockets have been way too big. 6.5 x 8 is common enough for Wested but they often go at 7 X 8.5 which is nuts. We used to call them clown pockets on this site.

Apart from this particualr jacket, then pockets on Wested are ususally okay these days for a Raiders. Forget their LC jacket - they never seem to get them right unless you send in specs.
RCSignals
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3665
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:32 pm
Location: Twin Galaxies

Post by RCSignals »

CM wrote:
Browncoat wrote:

I'd like to see a Wested with Tony's 6.5 x 8 pockets myself. I think larger pockets and fuller cut sleeves would really improve the Wested pattern.
Really? In the past the biggest problem with Wested is that the pockets have been way too big. 6.5 x 8 is common enough for Wested but they often go at 7 X 8.5 which is nuts. We used to call them clown pockets on this site.

Apart from this particualr jacket, then pockets on Wested are ususally okay these days for a Raiders. Forget their LC jacket - they never seem to get them right unless you send in specs.
It's looking more like there isn't a 'common enough' Wested Raiders pocket size.
too many requests for variations maybe. A vicious circle.
RCSignals
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3665
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:32 pm
Location: Twin Galaxies

Post by RCSignals »

Look at the pockets on this one

Image
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

Woah! Tall! :shock:
RCSignals
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3665
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:32 pm
Location: Twin Galaxies

Post by RCSignals »

indy1936 wrote:Woah! Tall! :shock:
It's a Wested on that famous auction site
User avatar
knibs7
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3261
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 5:55 pm
Location: TX
Contact:

Post by knibs7 »

Wow those pockets would be at my ribs!!!

Nibs
User avatar
Browncoat
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:02 pm
Location: California

Post by Browncoat »

CM wrote: Really? In the past the biggest problem with Wested is that the pockets have been way too big. 6.5 x 8 is common enough for Wested but they often go at 7 X 8.5 which is nuts. We used to call them clown pockets on this site.

Apart from this particualr jacket, then pockets on Wested are ususally okay these days for a Raiders. Forget their LC jacket - they never seem to get them right unless you send in specs.
Well 7 X 8.5 inch pockets would be oversized unless the jacket was a 60R+ :lol:

Wested's pattern does need tweaking. Can you honestly say (leather excluded) from a superficial standpoint that the Wested pattern is more accurate than the TN? The TN has the larger pockets, fuller sleeves and shorter body pretty much everything opposite of standard present Wested.

As far as what has happened in the past, its funny that jackets made in the past and were possibly snubbed for their inaccuracies are now being relooked for their construction, hide, etc. One person's garbage is another's treasure. :lol:

It is a vicious cycle but its great that Wested offers that much customization for the low price point.
User avatar
indy1936
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Post by indy1936 »

CM wrote: As far as what has happened in the past, its funny that jackets made in the past and were possibly snubbed for their inaccuracies are now being relooked for their construction, hide, etc. One person's garbage is another's treasure. :lol:
It is interesting. As noted by others I have found some features on my 90s Wested to be similar to the TN. It also includes details that are now considered screen accurate but were later changed based on customer input. The pocket shape, pleat depth, collar/storm flap placement come to mind as matching some current ideas on accuracy. Also interesting how things such as the side straps and d rings were modified once delivered to the set. All of this has been discussed before though. :P
Post Reply