Temple jacket proto for US Wings.

Discuss all of the intricacies of the jacket in full detail

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg

HDRnR
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: Where Forrestal cashed in

Post by HDRnR »

Holt, yes however if you look at your prototype even tho it goes all the way to the edge the vertical line of the backpanel along the sides has an arc to it, they are not straight lines so not really a V, I think that might prevent the flare out and allow going all the way to the edge.
User avatar
Holt
Craftsman
Posts: 14391
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

no its not a total V backpannel...it is sligthly V tappered..slightly..

thats why I said it is more of an V then a [ ]

and read the rest of my post about the flaring out...

I updated it..

bests
Holt
Doug C
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:26 am

Post by Doug C »

HDRnR, the prototype jacket had the one inch indentions typical of all US Wings jackets but it was altered away by bringing the sleeves closer to the panel. The pleats on these jackets are almost always open, however just like Holt had mentioned only the really deeply made ones flare out like crazy, and only Wested does 'em like that (not all of their jackets tho). Ford's jackets certainly have open action pleats, just watch closely and you see it constantly, the thing is they are shallow pleats and look fine that way. That opened effect can be minimized with elastic but the deep pleats will still look odd. So, yea what Holt said.. :D

Doug C
HDRnR
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: Where Forrestal cashed in

Post by HDRnR »

Thanks for clearing that up guys, I'm really looking forward to this ToD jacket, even more so now.
User avatar
crismans
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: southeast KY

Post by crismans »

DougC, I meant to ask you about the alterations. I know you had the sleeves tapered, but what all did you have altered to the torso. Holt believes (and I agree) that the ToD jacket lies somewhere between the Raiders cut and the LC cut.
Doug C
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:26 am

Post by Doug C »

Basically the torso and arms were slimmed down or narrowed a bit. If you look at the pitures of me wearing it, it was a bit too much for my build, but oh well.. but this necessitated the sleeve seems to be raised and that in turn eliminated the gap on the sides of the back panel. The straps were reconfigured and raised too. New skinny silver zipper (euro configuration), new lining.

Doug C
User avatar
Tennessee Smith
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10570
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Everything we need is right here.

Post by Tennessee Smith »

Holt, the jacket is looking good so far and Agent5 nice website link, I'm amazed at the amount of detail :D :tup: :tup: :tup:

Is there anyway this could be ready by Christmas? Also, will this be a Cow only jacket?
agent5
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3911
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:02 pm

Post by agent5 »

and Agent5 nice website link
Thanks. It was done over a year ago and since then much more has come to light on that jacket. I'm glad some here are taking up the mantle to get this project off the ground. The more the better. I like choices.
User avatar
crismans
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: southeast KY

Post by crismans »

Tennessee Smith wrote:Holt, the jacket is looking good so far and Agent5 nice website link, I'm amazed at the amount of detail :D :tup: :tup: :tup:

Is there anyway this could be ready by Christmas? Also, will this be a Cow only jacket?
Holt and I are working as hard as we can (especially Holt-he's a jacket workhorse! :shock: ) but there are so many variables, I don't think there can be a set time schedule. We're trying as hard as we can to nail down the specs and then everything goes off to the Sgt.

Again, in his original email, Hack said he would make 100 limited edition jackets for COW members only. If there is a good response to these, however, I imagine they could go into regular production if the demand was there.
User avatar
Tennessee Smith
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10570
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Everything we need is right here.

Post by Tennessee Smith »

This sounds great!!! Thanks Crismans!!!



One more question... Since the TOD is notably longer than the Raiders version, will this fall into the standard Tall length and if it's offered in a Tall how much longer will it be than the reg Tall?
User avatar
WeeMadHamish
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:32 am
Location: Ledyard, CT

Post by WeeMadHamish »

Indiana Holt wrote:look here.

see the red lines.thats were the new shoulder seam should be.

also the red dots are the armholes

bests
Holt
No offense to your model, Holt, but he's a bit of a hunchback. :lol:

Sorry to stick on this, but you want it to look right, correct? Your sketch doesn't account for the fact that the torso tapers toward the shoulder, and that the cut of clothing reflects that (or else it wouldn't fit correctly.) The repositioning of the seam shouldn't be so parallel. Rather, it should follow the lines of the trapezius, radiating from the shoulder hole at an almost square angle. Here, I pulled this screencap off of theraider.net:

Image

It's not a great image, but you can see the shoulder seam fairly clearly. In the overlay, the red line follows the actual curve of his shoulder (because as pointed out, the jacket is worn pretty far off of his shoulders because he lost weight and they replaced the liner with a thinner fabric.) The green line traces the seam as seen. The blue line is about where the seam appears on Raiders models of the jacket, ie on top of the ridge of the trapezius. As you can see, the movement is not proportional... the end of the seam at the collar has moved farther back, while the end at the sleeve seam has moved less. This is because of the tapered shape of the torso-shoulder construction.

Of course, this is all just my opinion, as I am not a professional pattern cutter, but this is what I see and what I believe according to my design and construction aesthetics.

Interestingly, this seems like the only time that the jacket isn't falling off of his back; the seam sits a bit higher on his shoulders.
golpeo_rapidamente
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 5:56 am
Location: Far Kew,Melbourne
Contact:

Post by golpeo_rapidamente »

Great work

Cant wait til we see a working model
User avatar
JC1972
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1134
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:38 pm
Location: Lake Mary, FL

Post by JC1972 »

Tennessee Smith wrote:This sounds great!!! Thanks Crismans!!!



One more question... Since the TOD is notably longer than the Raiders version, will this fall into the standard Tall length and if it's offered in a Tall how much longer will it be than the reg Tall?
I was wondering this too as I may need a tall being 6'3"
User avatar
Holt
Craftsman
Posts: 14391
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

I think the ''longer'' jacket was a bit made up.

when I watch Temple I dont see it exacly so much longer then the raiders jacket.

everybody says that is it longer..but they allways refer to the elephant scene..yeah off course it looks longer when Indy sits on an elephant,any jacket would

see here..
see where the jacket ends a little under his belt..now either it was a shorter jacket or Indy wore his pants on his hips...you decide.
Image

bests
Holt
Doug C
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:26 am

Post by Doug C »

Holt wrote:
I think the ''longer'' jacket was a bit made up.
OMG!! I could NOT agree more! It's never looked longer to me either. I think the whole idea of a longer length was Peter's idea when he was asked to make a TofD jacket for someone long ago. Also, I think that Peter's Raider jackets in the early days were a bit too short in the waist (my early ones were for sure) and therefore it was a natural thing to add an inch for a TofD. I could be wrong but that's my guess. Regardless, when assessing the jackets length look at where the sleeve ends in comparison to where the body ends - there not a great bit of difference between the first three movies. Actually I think if anything, the TofD looked slightly shorter than raiders (both in sleeves and waist).

Doug C
CM
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by CM »

Indiana Holt wrote:I think the ''longer'' jacket was a bit made up.

when I watch Temple I dont see it exacly so much longer then the raiders jacket.

everybody says that is it longer..but they allways refer to the elephant scene..yeah off course it looks longer when Indy sits on an elephant,any jacket would

see here..
see where the jacket ends a little under his belt..now either it was a shorter jacket or Indy wore his pants on his hips...you decide.
Image

bests
Holt
We never knew for certain if the jacket was longer - and I certainly never accepted this as fact. That was just Peter's claim when he used to tell us that he made the jacket. He'd say it was the same as the Raiders jacket only 1 inch longer.
User avatar
Tennessee Smith
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10570
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Everything we need is right here.

Post by Tennessee Smith »

Well, since _ just did the write up for the TOD jacket does he have specs on the different types used? He said Harrison had lost between 8-12 lbs by the time filming had began so the Cooper jacket was too large for him so they altered the lining to adjust to his "new" size for some of the shots (this could account for the Longer look, albeit just that it's too big for him). From the writing it said numerous jackets were used, are you using an amalgamation of all types or selecting one specific look for this jacket?
User avatar
Holt
Craftsman
Posts: 14391
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

well IMO people can say what ever they want about it..

in my eyes this is NOT a long jacket.

I have seen long jackets and this jacket above is super short when compared to a long

bests
Holt
agent5
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3911
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:02 pm

Post by agent5 »

The shorter pockets will also create an illustion of a longer jacket since it makes the body look longer.
User avatar
Weston
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:14 pm
Location: The jungles of Oh-ree-gahn, USA

Post by Weston »

For what it's worth, I think the only difference in length is the back. It looks a bit longer on the Tod jacket, and a little shorter on the Raiders jacket. I think the front looks the same length on both jackets.

Weston
Doug C
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:26 am

Post by Doug C »

I can agree with all that Weston just said! While it may not be considered a long jacket it shouldn't be shorter than a Raiders either. Again - body length is relative to what the sleeves lengths are. Not equal but not far off.

Doug C
Prescott
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 10:59 am

Post by Prescott »

We know that the smaller pockets in the front make the jacket look longer on Ford. I also believe that a longer yoke down the back also creates the illusion of a longer jacket. You have two features, front and back, that complete the effect.
-P-
User avatar
Inbanana
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:08 pm

Post by Inbanana »

The only thing I can tell about the length is that is back of the jacket looks like it totally covers the pocket flaps of the pants in most of the scenes where Indy is standing upright, but when he raises his arms to hug Willie (bottom right), you can see the flap poke out from the bottom...
Image
The Raiders jacket on the other hand looks a little bit shorter to me (you can usually see the bottom edge of the flap just under the jacket)... or, like you guys said... its probably just the back length thats mainly different.
User avatar
coronado3
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:45 pm
Location: indiana

Post by coronado3 »

I hate it when the back of a jacket is super short. When i sit, it feels like th bottom is across my kidneys!
agent5
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3911
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:02 pm

Post by agent5 »

It also matters where Ford wore his pants in both movies. If he wore them even slightly higher in Raiders than TOD, it will change how we preceive everything.
Doug C
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:26 am

Post by Doug C »

Does anyone know if Chris King has that jacket zipped in the shot of the back, that panel doesn't seem quite as wide, but if it was zipped perhaps. Also did Chris ever post his personal measurements or size?

Doug C
PLATON
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 1961
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:11 am

Post by PLATON »

I also do not think that TOD jacket was longer.
Perhaps the case is that it is narrower in the chest and this gives it a slimmer appearance that gives the illusion of being longer.

Holt, nice effort, I recommend to study the photos showing the collar a bit more because wings collar is way off.
User avatar
Cassidy
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1175
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 10:24 am
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada...

Post by Cassidy »

agent5 wrote:It also matters where Ford wore his pants in both movies. If he wore them even slightly higher in Raiders than TOD, it will change how we preceive everything.
Agreed - and given his level of fitness in ToD it's possible the pants were worn higher than in Raiders. Does that make any sense or was that a stupid thing to say? :oops:
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44456
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Oh, I don't know....no worse than me saying many years ago there HAD to be two buckles on the bag strap. :-k 8-[

Regards! Michaelson
Dutch_jones
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1438
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Holland
Contact:

Post by Dutch_jones »

It could very well be that he wore them much higher in tod. In Lc and in CS he wore his pants pretty high too, thus creating an image of a longer body in the jacket.

But when I saw some of the photos of the ford sized CS jackets by Tony Nowak, they didn't appear to be that long in the body. So I also think its the way he wears his pants.
Doug C
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:26 am

Post by Doug C »

I just wanted to point out that even Short Round's jacket looks long in the above picture of him on the elephant with Indy. So, that's not a good reference pic to make the argument that the TofD jacket was long IMHO. Take a look..

Doug C
User avatar
crismans
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: southeast KY

Post by crismans »

Things are progressing well on the Wings Temple of Doom jacket project. I emailed Sgt. Hack to double check a few things and the price will still be $300 for the jacket. It will be a limited edition of only 100 jackets made.

He says he's been busy gearing up for making the military their jackets, McCain sunglasses, and having the lotteries removing their claims that their jackets were manufactured by Wings but he's excited about making a COW jacket.
User avatar
Indiana G
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3918
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: in the Temple of Insanity

Post by Indiana G »

so how do we get on the list? :wink:
Indy_Mic
Dig Worker
Dig Worker
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Rocky Mountains

Post by Indy_Mic »

Will any of the 100 be talls / longs?
User avatar
JC1972
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1134
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:38 pm
Location: Lake Mary, FL

Post by JC1972 »

Indy_Mic wrote:Will any of the 100 be talls / longs?
I doubt it if its only a 100 made.
HDRnR
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: Where Forrestal cashed in

Post by HDRnR »

Mark me down...
User avatar
crismans
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: southeast KY

Post by crismans »

Indy_Mic wrote:Will any of the 100 be talls / longs?
I forgot to ask that! ](*,) I try not to flood the Sgt. with too many emails so I'll wait a couple of days and ask him.
User avatar
JC1972
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1134
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:38 pm
Location: Lake Mary, FL

Post by JC1972 »

HDRnR wrote:Mark me down...
Yeah, how would that work? A lot of people can say "put me down for one" but I would think you would have to actually put money down to be in line. No?
User avatar
Holt
Craftsman
Posts: 14391
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

lets just whait until we recieve the proto jacket from US Wings.

we will look over the jacket and do a contol check to make sure it has every detail it needs to have before it is made a limit of 100 jacket.

thats all I can say for now.

but we are getting close and we are about to send of the specs to David Hack

bests
Holt
HDRnR
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: Where Forrestal cashed in

Post by HDRnR »

Any new developments ?
User avatar
crismans
Expeditionary Hero
Expeditionary Hero
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: southeast KY

Post by crismans »

The spec sheet for changes to the prototype jacket is pretty much done, just a tweak here and there. We're waiting to get some buckles that will hopefully do the trick. Then everything is off to Wings.
HDRnR
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: Where Forrestal cashed in

Post by HDRnR »

Cool, looking forward to it. Has the leather been decided yet ?
User avatar
Holt
Craftsman
Posts: 14391
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

the leather will be lambskin.

regards
Holt
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44456
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Since the project is soon to go into production, may as well 'unstickie' this one now.

Regard! Michaelson
Bemo
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:23 pm
Location: Boise, ID

leather choice

Post by Bemo »

As much as I like the idea behind this project, I'm really not interested in a lambskin; but that's just me. If this project takes off, I hope it's eventually offered in goat. But that's just me.

Peace.
User avatar
Holt
Craftsman
Posts: 14391
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:40 am
Location: COW's Watch Tower

Post by Holt »

just an update.

I dont know how many countless of hours we have used on this project but the spec sheet is ready.

the only part left for now is to whait on the buckles.

the spec sheet and the proto jacket will very soon be sendt of to US Wings.

the leather will either be the vintage Lambskin,It looks new out of the box, but ages rapidly and in the proper places of stress and wear.

or the vintage cowhide.which is a vinner in my opinion.it just has the temple jacket leather look.but might be a tad to thick.just a tad..

and a freind of mine has a wings goat and the leather just has a rubbery and plasticley look and feel to it.maby over a the many years to come and with lots of wear and tear it might look the part?..


bests
Holt
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Post by Raider S »

I'd want the lamb over the cowhide. The cowhide is excellent, but since I already have one... :wink:
User avatar
Indiana Strones
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1760
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:48 pm
Location: Roma, Italy

Post by Indiana Strones »

I don't understand. We all here are looking for SA in every incredibly small detail, and then... someone asks for a completely not SA hide as cowhide or goat. People ready to kill their mothers for the right buckle or pocket, are indifferent to SA hide.
I think this is a complete nonsense. :?:
Last edited by Indiana Strones on Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
CM
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by CM »

Indiana Strones wrote:I don't understand. We all here are looking for SA in every incredibly small detail, and then... someone ask for a completely not SA hide as cowhide or goat. People ready to kill their mothers for the right buckle or pocket, are indifferent to SA hide.
I think this is a complete nonsense. :?:


:rolling:

Yeah, that's ture. I'm one of them. I want the design, but made from a better, stronger hide. The drape, etc doesn't matter to me because the only way to get the identical look to the film one is to get hide from the same sheep and that ain't gonna happen. I actually think that the ToD look can be had pretty easily in goat. Unlike the thin Raiders jacket, the ToD doesn't flop about much. And I would never distress a jacket so I, like some of us here, don't really care to copy absolutely everything about the jacket.

Just my thoughts - cheers CM
HDRnR
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: Where Forrestal cashed in

Post by HDRnR »

The VIP cowhide is awesome and it really should be considered. Its thick but like butter, I think it would give the best of both worlds.
Post Reply