Wells Lamont at Wal Mart

Bags, Boots, Shirts and all other gear should be discussed here.

Moderators: Mike, Cajunkraut, Tennessee Smith

Post Reply
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Wells Lamont at Wal Mart

Post by Raider S »

FYI to anyone looking for the Wells Lamont gloves, I picked a pair up at Wal Mart this evening for $8.99.

These are the Grips version with only a small mule logo embossed on the cuff of the left glove.

There are other versions with a much bigger embossed name, some that have straps to make them tighter, and rather odd stitching. So make sure to rumage around and get the ones that seem the least cluttered.

To weather I'll use the old fashioned way - working outside in the dirt!

Image
User avatar
myamoebafriend
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:26 am
Location: Birmingham, AL

Post by myamoebafriend »

Nice find! I need to go there or Lowes or somewhere so I can get a pair.
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Post by Raider S »

My Lowes only had the odd looking ones (I was actually needing to buy gloves for work so this is why I know) so I decided not to get any and use some gloves I already had.

Was in the Wal Mart looking for something else when I came across these in the men's clothing section on a rack next to some ugly looking hats. So check there first if wanting a pair.
User avatar
JimL
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 777
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:37 pm
Location: CT, Long Island, NY
Contact:

Post by JimL »

I get mine there too...

Not for costuming (although that is an interesting coincidence) but to actually use...

I should sell my "worn out" ones here! REAL distressing! Only $50.00!

Operators are standing by...
User avatar
scot2525
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 9:56 pm
Location: Northeast of Indy

Post by scot2525 »

I got my pair at Wal Mart as well. They had the grips in the palm but I cut them out.
Image

That is mostly natural distressing. I put some alcohol on them the first time I went out do do yard work and then added some bronzing sun tan lotion to soften them and darken them a little.
User avatar
IndianaBogart
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:25 am
Location: ...listening to a tinny piano playing in the parlor downstairs....

Post by IndianaBogart »

That's exactly where I found my Wells-Lamont gloves. On a rack in the mens underwear/sock rack. :-s I have two pairs. One is the pair I use that got naturally distressed, the other pair I artificially distressed. See if you can tell which is which. :wink:

Image


Image
RobocopIndy
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:24 am
Location: Hillsborough, NC

Post by RobocopIndy »

I picked up the same ones at Sears last week in the lawn & garden area.
gmarthe
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:38 pm
Location: Davie, FL

Post by gmarthe »

I got mine at Sears a couple of years ago. Good to know they still have them!
User avatar
RobbyT43
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: Well depending on the time, I could be in one spot or several...
Contact:

Post by RobbyT43 »

Yep. I got my gloves at Wally World too. Its was good deal for that price.

-Robby 8)
User avatar
scot2525
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 9:56 pm
Location: Northeast of Indy

Post by scot2525 »

IndianaBogart wrote:That's exactly where I found my Wells-Lamont gloves. On a rack in the mens underwear/sock rack. :-s I have two pairs. One is the pair I use that got naturally distressed, the other pair I artificially distressed. See if you can tell which is which. :wink:

Image


Image
I say the top pair is artificial as the gloves really do not look worn in. The bottom pair look as if they have been worn alot even though they appear to be less dirty.
User avatar
IndianaBogart
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:25 am
Location: ...listening to a tinny piano playing in the parlor downstairs....

Post by IndianaBogart »

I hate to have to say it, but the top pair is the pair that I've used the most, and hence has the natural distressing. I think the reason they don't look very broken-in is because I worked in the rain with them once and they got soaked and after they dried they became a little stiff. The bottom pair I've used occasionally, but they never got very distressed looking, so I decided to artificially distress them. It was a good guess though. :)
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Post by Raider S »

The new gloves after getting them damp then working in the yard for a couple hours. A few more hours of work and you have a perfect item. Much better than using paint, in my opinion, plus you get something accomplished at the same time. The little dark spots are rain drops during the picture taking.

Image
Doug C
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:26 am

Post by Doug C »

Since there isn't a note about it on the main page's gear section, under accessories - what is the exact model gloves that were used, and is this what you guys are showing off (no palm pictures).

Doug C
User avatar
BOINKFFD
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Franklin, Tn

Post by BOINKFFD »

I think mine are 1130 from Walmart. But they have the palm patch.
Indiana Rich
Archaeology Student
Archaeology Student
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Cincinnati OH

Post by Indiana Rich »

Hi,

Picked up a pair at Walmart last night. Now I need to remove the grips. Any ideas on the best way to do this? I am especially concerned on where the grips meet the seam on the side of the gloves?

Any help would be appreciated

Thanks

IR
User avatar
Zombie Jones
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:29 am
Location: So. California

Post by Zombie Jones »

Doug C wrote:Since there isn't a note about it on the main page's gear section, under accessories - what is the exact model gloves that were used, and is this what you guys are showing off (no palm pictures).

Doug C
Some people believe the gloves in Raiders were Wells Lamont model 1123, which are no longer being manufactured. However, others have stated they were definitely not the 1123's, and that the 1130's are the gloves that were used. The debate seems to focus on the suede palm patch, which was apparently not present on the gloves used in Raiders:

Image

Wells Lamont currently makes a glove similar to the 1130 without the suede palm patch, model number 1750. They are goatskin rather than cowhide, and (judging by the photos on Wells Lamont's website) they are considerable whiter in color than the 1130:

1130:

http://www.wellslamont.com/pg_styledeta ... style=1757

1750:

http://www.wellslamont.com/pg_styledeta ... style=1774

However, my 1130's are quite a bit lighter/whiter than the 1130's in their photo (or they were before I started using them), so this may be yet another Indy gear item that doesn't photograph it's true color. :roll:
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44486
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Considering the fact that both Wells Lamont and MidWest gloves were BOTH present and in use on the set of Raiders, there will always be debate as to which gloves were actually in use at any given time during the filming.

Regards! Michaelson
agent5
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3911
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:02 pm

Post by agent5 »

I'd say that based on the screen caps they were not Midwest gloves, but the Wells Lamont. I think it was speculative for a while but newer screen caps put that one to rest, or so I thought. One thing is 100% though, they were not 1123's.
The debate seems to focus on the suede palm patch, which was apparently not present on the gloves used in Raiders:
Not at all. The older 1130's had no palm patch until about 2003 or so. The debate is about the pattern of the glove, not the palm patch.

Do all of your new gloves have the palm patch?
User avatar
BOINKFFD
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Franklin, Tn

Post by BOINKFFD »

I looked again and they all have the patch. I have an old set of WL from my days of Wildland Firefighting and they seem to be the correct version.Unfortunatly they are trashed with hold in the fingers.
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Post by Raider S »

Indiana Rich wrote:Hi,

Picked up a pair at Walmart last night. Now I need to remove the grips. Any ideas on the best way to do this? I am especially concerned on where the grips meet the seam on the side of the gloves?

Any help would be appreciated

Thanks

IR
Leave the patch on and use the gloves is my opinion.

Do some work in them and in a few hours they'll be weathered. I'm actually a little shocked people will pay extra for pre-distressed gloves. Simply put them on, stick your hands under water for a minute, then work in the yard for a couple hours - grab a shovel and play in the dirt.
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44486
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

agent5 wrote:I'd say that based on the screen caps they were not Midwest gloves, but the Wells Lamont. I think it was speculative for a while but newer screen caps put that one to rest, or so I thought.
Not really. Several of us saw the set invoices years ago, and MidWest was as well represented as Wells Lamont for use on set by all parties involved.

I remember when all the screen cap discussion were going on, and it was assumed that door had been closed. It was for many, but not for all, as it only proved those screen caps had Wells Lamonts represented. It didn't remove the fact that MidWest gloves were also available on set, and from production personnel conversations, were used by the actors too. :lol: :wink:

With that, you can find Mid-West gloves at Wal-Mart too, but out in the Lawn and Garden area. Why they sell them in two completely different departments of the store is beyond me! :roll: I have found that the MidWest glove fits my hand better than Wells Lamont too!

Regards! Michaelson
User avatar
Zombie Jones
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:29 am
Location: So. California

Post by Zombie Jones »

agent5 wrote:
Zombie Jones wrote:The debate seems to focus on the suede palm patch, which was apparently not present on the gloves used in Raiders:
Not at all. The older 1130's had no palm patch until about 2003 or so. The debate is about the pattern of the glove, not the palm patch.
Thank you for correcting me. Most of the online discussions I've read regarding these gloves focused on the palm patch, and I didn't realize the pattern was a larger issue. Quite frankly, except for the palm patch I don't see much difference. But then, I can't tell one film-used jacket from another, so... :oops:
User avatar
Kt Templar
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 4715
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:32 am
Location: London.

Post by Kt Templar »

I'm like the 0122 at gloves online, gun cut and no palm patch.

http://www.gloves-online.com/proddetail ... od=WK-0122

Image
User avatar
BOINKFFD
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Franklin, Tn

Post by BOINKFFD »

If people need to distress their gloves, I have a lot of weed removal and garden work to be done.
User avatar
Zombie Jones
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:29 am
Location: So. California

Post by Zombie Jones »

BOINKFFD wrote:If people need to distress their gloves, I have a lot of weed removal and garden work to be done.
No problem. Bring your yard to Southern California and I'll have a go at it. Image
User avatar
Raider S
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Post by Raider S »

Danny Dravot wrote: You assume that every gearhead actually has a "yard" with "dirt" in which to play! I've lived in apartments or townhouses for the last 22 years...
Certainly there's a park nearby. Go and swing on some trees, collect exotic weeds, and do handstands.
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44486
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Danny Dravot wrote:You assume that every gearhead actually has a "yard" with "dirt" in which to play! I've lived in apartments or townhouses for the last 22 years...
You lucky son of a gun! :( :wink:

Regards! Michaelson
User avatar
scot2525
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 9:56 pm
Location: Northeast of Indy

Post by scot2525 »

Raider S wrote:
Indiana Rich wrote:Hi,

Picked up a pair at Walmart last night. Now I need to remove the grips. Any ideas on the best way to do this? I am especially concerned on where the grips meet the seam on the side of the gloves?

Any help would be appreciated

Thanks

IR



I removed the patch and still use the gloves around the house when doing yard work. Removing the patches was easy, I slipped a small knife under a couple of stiches and cut them on top of the patch and this opened a small little hole between the patch and and the glove and then just ran the knife along the rest of the stitching. After this is done you have the patch hanging off the side. Take a pair of really sharp scissors and cut the patch off as close as you can to the seam. Took laess than 5 minutes to do it
Post Reply