Was the Smithsonian jacket actually in the movie or...
Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg
Was the Smithsonian jacket actually in the movie or...
Please only answer this if you know...
Was the jacket displayed actually used in LC? Is it part of a lot that didn't get used but WAS made for the film? Or is there another story to it? I'd also like to know if it wasn't used is it is an exact copy of one used in LC.
Cheers
Was the jacket displayed actually used in LC? Is it part of a lot that didn't get used but WAS made for the film? Or is there another story to it? I'd also like to know if it wasn't used is it is an exact copy of one used in LC.
Cheers
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44486
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 2:41 pm
- Location: Messin' with Saquatch...
- Contact:
That's what I get for assuming.... I was not aware of that, I stand corrected! Thank's for the info my friend!_ wrote:The jacket in the display was not ever used during production. In fact, when the donation was made, they pulled the jacket from the archives and it had not even been distressed. Somebody from the property room did it with sandpaper and they shipped it off to Washington...
Jacket and Fedora at the Smithsonian
Last edited by Minnesota Jones on Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
No, you're right. But even if the jacket you have shown was in the movie -I have yet to see any screen captures with those narrow pocket flaps. They all look like the ones in the Smithsonian.Indiana Holt wrote:ok thanks.
suddenly I noticed that the pocket size are different on both the LC jackets..
or is it just me?
Holt
Thanks for that... when you say archives... I'm assuming that you mean LC archives? Or not..._ wrote:The jacket in the display was not ever used during production. In fact, when the donation was made, they pulled the jacket from the archives and it had not even been distressed. Somebody from the property room did it with sandpaper and they shipped it off to Washington...
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44486
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- Chewing Wax
- Field Surveyor
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:46 pm
- Location: BUFFALO
What's the point?
That's like if Archy Bunker's chair wasn't the one Carroll O'Connor sat in on the set. I don't see what the point of having that jacket on display is. Do they say it isn't the one worn in the movie?_ wrote:The jacket in the display was not ever used during production. In fact, when the donation was made, they pulled the jacket from the archives and it had not even been distressed. Somebody from the property room did it with sandpaper and they shipped it off to Washington...
Re: What's the point?
Well yeah... they coudl have hung my jacket in there... However, it may have been one made for LC that was not used. Does anyone know?Chewing Wax wrote:That's like if Archy Bunker's chair wasn't the one Carroll O'Connor sat in on the set. I don't see what the point of having that jacket on display is. Do they say it isn't the one worn in the movie?_ wrote:The jacket in the display was not ever used during production. In fact, when the donation was made, they pulled the jacket from the archives and it had not even been distressed. Somebody from the property room did it with sandpaper and they shipped it off to Washington...
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 2:41 pm
- Location: Messin' with Saquatch...
- Contact:
Re: What's the point?
Don't forget, they ALSO state that the Jacket and Hat both (or just the Jacket?) were ALSO in Raiders, besides LC... we've told them many times it was an LC Jacket (distressing, storm flap snaps, etc), but they've refused to change the sign...Chewing Wax wrote:That's like if Archy Bunker's chair wasn't the one Carroll O'Connor sat in on the set. I don't see what the point of having that jacket on display is. Do they say it isn't the one worn in the movie?_ wrote:The jacket in the display was not ever used during production. In fact, when the donation was made, they pulled the jacket from the archives and it had not even been distressed. Somebody from the property room did it with sandpaper and they shipped it off to Washington...
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44486
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- Tennessee Smith
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10583
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:47 pm
- Location: Everything we need is right here.
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44486
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- myamoebafriend
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:26 am
- Location: Birmingham, AL
- Bruce Wayne
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:56 pm
- Location: Gotham City by way of Hoosierville 46304
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44486
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- DanielJones
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:52 pm
- Location: The Left Coast
- TheMechanic
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:56 pm
- Location: In a skillet with potatoes & onions
They couldn't have found a screen used jacket to give to the Smithsonian?? Where did they all go? There must be 100 jackets from all the movies out there somewhere.
Also, why bother archiving the jackets? (if that's what they're doing with them.) It's not like they hang onto them to copy for the next movie. If that was the case all of his jackets would have looked like the Raiders jacket.
Who knows.
Also, why bother archiving the jackets? (if that's what they're doing with them.) It's not like they hang onto them to copy for the next movie. If that was the case all of his jackets would have looked like the Raiders jacket.
Who knows.
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44486
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44486
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
this is Dave Crowther at Lucasfilm Archives in Marin county during spring break of 1991.
he is a friend of Don Bies who is an archivist at skywalker ranch.
He arranged for a small group of people to have a private, unguided and open tour of the archives.
bests
Holt
he is a friend of Don Bies who is an archivist at skywalker ranch.
He arranged for a small group of people to have a private, unguided and open tour of the archives.
bests
Holt
Last edited by Holt on Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Tennessee Smith
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10583
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:47 pm
- Location: Everything we need is right here.
In the film in most shots it looks cow as well. But it's more like a G&B thick lamb. When the film came out my friends and I all thought that the jacket was made of bike leather...Indiana Holt wrote:allways when I looked at this picture I never got the impression that this jacket is made from lambskin..it looks so much thicker...it looks like a cow hide..
alltough Peter tells me that all the LC jackets were made from Lamb....
bests
Holt
Well that's just silly... they passed a law in 1987 prohibiting the killing and skinning of bikes!CM wrote:In the film in most shots it looks cow as well. But it's more like a G&B thick lamb. When the film came out my friends and I all thought that the jacket was made of bike leather...
I think it looks like cow too (and actually I've always just assumed that it was!!)... but if Peter says lamb, then it must have been lamb!
Shane
- Indiana Strones
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:48 pm
- Location: Roma, Italy
Sorry, I don't agree. I think that the jacket was used, and the proof is in this production photo. As you can see, it's the same jacket._ wrote:The jacket in the display was not ever used during production. In fact, when the donation was made, they pulled the jacket from the archives and it had not even been distressed. Somebody from the property room did it with sandpaper and they shipped it off to Washington...
-
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 1:18 pm
- Location: Canada... most of the time
This is very true... BUT... if you look at the scene on the beach check out how the leather flaps in the wind around Fords chest after Connery does his bird trick. You can really see there how thin the leather is. Ahhhh.... the illusion of filmIndiana Holt wrote:allways when I looked at this picture I never got the impression that this jacket is made from lambskin..it looks so much thicker...it looks like a cow hide..
alltough Peter tells me that all the LC jackets were made from Lamb....
bests
Holt
- Indiana Strones
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:48 pm
- Location: Roma, Italy
That's amazing... well done. Now is that teh Smithsonian jacket or the one from the Chicago display? Or are they the same jacket?Indiana Strones wrote:Sorry, I don't agree. I think that the jacket was used, and the proof is in this production photo. As you can see, it's the same jacket._ wrote:The jacket in the display was not ever used during production. In fact, when the donation was made, they pulled the jacket from the archives and it had not even been distressed. Somebody from the property room did it with sandpaper and they shipped it off to Washington...
Cheers
- Indiana Strones
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:48 pm
- Location: Roma, Italy
- Indiana Strones
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:48 pm
- Location: Roma, Italy
No, I don't agree. Look at this official Smithsonian photo. It's the same jacket.CM wrote:I don't think this display jacket is the Smithsonian jacket we're looking at. The one on display here (not being worn) is probably from the Chicago display. If you source other Smithsonain photos, you'll see that those markings are not present.
Cheers