How'd you sneak back in?!_ wrote:Man! A guy leaves the country for few weeks and all heck breaks loose...
Hope you're rested and reinvigorated!
Mike
Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg
Vivli wrote:Okay, that makes a lot more sense. Although I suppose now US Wings have lost the licence, it means that they're pretty much in the same boat as any other vendor, and so can't use the name.WeeMadHamish wrote: I think the difference is this: The Stormtrooper costume is an iconic design immediately recognizable as belonging to the Star Wars universe (LFL's IP) and ONLY to the Star Wars universe. "Indy" gear, on the other hand, has a basis in real-world design and is in itself not as inherently iconic until you put it all together. It's just a jacket, until you put it together with the hat and the whip. They're clothes, and not as immediately recognizable as the white armor.
LFL has a responsibility to protect not only itself, but its licensees, from illicit use of its intellectual property. If they choose to overlook a violation of their IP for whatever reason, it sets a precedent that can cause them all sorts of legal problems when a real challenge to their property arises.
It's surprising, though, that this would be an issue for US Wings, since they /were/ a licensee at some point, weren't they?
Would it be a problem for Peter at Wested too though? I mean, he uses the copyrighted name in a sense, writing on his website that he made the Indy jackets specifically etc. I only ask 'cause I'd hate to see Peter get in trouble, since he's such an amazing guy and works so hard on creating these replicas for us.
I mean, I know I'm probably being a bit paranoid, but if US Wings had to stop using it and they were an licensee at one point, I can imagine the same thing happening to Wested.