Question about a S&W .45 acp I found today

Need help finding an Indy Gun, want to discuss film used guns...

Moderator: Cajunkraut

Post Reply
User avatar
Wraith1031
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Question about a S&W .45 acp I found today

Post by Wraith1031 »

Ok, I went into a local gun store today and lo and behold in the used case is a S&W .45 acp pistol, swivel on the butt and all. Here is my delima it is NOT a 1917, the guy said it is basically the exact same gun but it is the commercial version and has a flat finish. He is asking $400 for it and it could stand to be refinished, but otherwise seems to be in great shape. Is it worth that not being an actual 1917 model or should I pass? :?:
User avatar
Pyroxene
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 1820
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 9:35 am
Location: San Marcos, TX
Contact:

Post by Pyroxene »

It doesn't have to be a 1917. I have a S&W 1937 which is the exact same gun just produced for a different contract.

Image


The "flat finish" sorta puzzles me a little. But the price is tempting.
User avatar
Wraith1031
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Post by Wraith1031 »

From what I understand commercial just means it was not made for the military.
carebear
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:09 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Post by carebear »

Wraith1031 wrote:From what I understand commercial just means it was not made for the military.
Same gun. It'll be "screen accurate" except for the markings. If you have it reblued the current finish won't matter.

That's a good price, if I saw a clean and functinonal '17 or '37 or a Brazilian contract in a shop for $400 I'd buy it right then. They aren't making any more of any of the variations after all.
User avatar
bigrex
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1188
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:21 pm
Location: Alfecca Meridiana

Post by bigrex »

If the gun is in working order, that is a very reasonable price. For a top grade gun you might be looking at upwards of $600-700 I would imagine. Do a search on a gun auction site such as gunbroker and get some price comparisons. I just ran a search on gunbroker for a S&W 1937 and came up with an interesting Brazilian contract gun.
User avatar
binkmeisterRick
Stealer of Wallets
Posts: 16926
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Chattering with these old bones

Post by binkmeisterRick »

The 1937's were essentially 1917's sold to the Brazilian government in 1937. The only real difference is the added markings on the revolver. Often you'll find the Brazillian contract guns cheaper than the 1917's. I saw one in a shop some years ago that had been refinished with a dull, matte finish (I would've reblued it) and for a great price, but I simply didn't have the cash at the time. $400 seems a good catch to me.
User avatar
Lee Keppler
Vendor
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 5:43 pm
Location: So. California (San Diego Area)
Contact:

Post by Lee Keppler »

The commercial model IS a 1917. If it's a .45 A.C.P. and the timing is good, no prob.
User avatar
Wraith1031
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Post by Wraith1031 »

I think I am going back tomorrow to pick it up. Thanks All!
theinterchange
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 am

Post by theinterchange »

I was at Gander Mountain yesterday and saw a 1917 for $1,600. Is that outrageous or about right? Just to be clear it was in very good shape.
The Pilot
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 1:30 pm
Location: The Great Green Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Post by The Pilot »

OK, I've had to break out the Non-Volatile Random Access Storage Medium (the book).

According to Standard Catalog Of Smith & Wesson published in 2006:

Code: Select all

As New     $2,000
Exc+       $1,350
Exc        $  950
VG         $  700
Good       $  475
Fair       $  375
Poor       $  275
That's for the military version with the 1 - 209791 serial number range, which were produced from c.1917 to 1946.

A Post-War revolver was introduced in May of 1946. These had 'Magna' style grips and a blue commercial finish.
At the conclusion of WWII 10,000 frames and spare parts stamped in the 1930s were purchased back from the government, assembled and sold as late as 1949 and 1950 again as the Model 1917 Army. Believed fewer than 1000 commercial versions were made in a serial number range of S209792 - S210782 with an 'S' serial prefix to indicate the new postwar hammer block and continued within the 1917 serial number range.
Judging only by the grips, I'm guessing the gun in the OP isn't one of those. (Check the s/n.) Prices listed in this book for the 1946 - 1950 postwar model are:

Code: Select all

As New     $3,000
Exc        $1,800
VG         $1,000
Good       $  500
Fair       $  375
Poor       $  275
User avatar
Magnum Jones
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:36 pm
Location: N W Indiana

Post by Magnum Jones »

theinterchange wrote:I was at Gander Mountain yesterday and saw a 1917 for $1,600. Is that outrageous or about right? Just to be clear it was in very good shape.
In my opinion thats insane, You could get a Kimber run it through the shop and still have change left.
theinterchange
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 am

Post by theinterchange »

Magnum Jones wrote:
theinterchange wrote:I was at Gander Mountain yesterday and saw a 1917 for $1,600. Is that outrageous or about right? Just to be clear it was in very good shape.
In my opinion thats insane, You could get a Kimber run it through the shop and still have change left.
I was thinking it was more than a tad on the high side of things. I wasn't interested in buying it but was just curious for future reference.
User avatar
ddibling
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Casablanca...where I wait, and wait, and wait...

Post by ddibling »

I wouldn't sweat the M1917 thing if I were you. As I understand it, Indy's wasn't an M1917 anyway, it was a Hand Ejector Model II. ( I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong! :wink: ) But the HEII and the M1917 are almost dead ringers for each other so, personally, I don't think it's important enough to get hung up on. Personally, I bought one of the new re-issue M1917's because I intend to shoot it quite a bit and I was a little leery of buying a 90 year old gun to actually fire!

If you're not going to buy the real Stembridge (which you're not :wink: ) then you're only getting "close enough" anyway.

Dean
User avatar
Wraith1031
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Post by Wraith1031 »

Was it an old 1917 or the reissue that they started producing again?
User avatar
ddibling
Field Surveyor
Field Surveyor
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Casablanca...where I wait, and wait, and wait...

Post by ddibling »

Wraith,

If you're asking me, I bought one of the new production models from S&W.

Dean
theinterchange
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 am

Post by theinterchange »

and if asking me.. I'm not 100% sure. It was behind glass and employees were elusive so I couldn't get a real good look or hold it. I don't believe it was a reissue though, if so it looked old for it's age.
User avatar
Luke Warmwater
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 414
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:28 pm
Location: Kensington, MD
Contact:

Post by Luke Warmwater »

theinterchange wrote:I was at Gander Mountain yesterday and saw a 1917 for $1,600. Is that outrageous or about right? Just to be clear it was in very good shape.
I got mine for half that. Don't bother.
theinterchange
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 am

Post by theinterchange »

Yeah. I'm currently shopping around for a good 22 for target practice. I was searching GunBroker.com and saw that S&W makes a 22 clone of a 1917. Anyone know something about them?
User avatar
Lee Keppler
Vendor
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 5:43 pm
Location: So. California (San Diego Area)
Contact:

Post by Lee Keppler »

The Bapty gun is a Second Model Hand Ejector Cal .455 webley. It was produced , along with some First Models(Triple Lock) for the British in WW1 for the USA's "Lend Lease" program. The US didn't enter the war until 1917, hence the creation of the Second Model HE in .45 ACP known as the 1917. This was done because there were not enough 1911 Govt. Models for every soldier. S&W came up with the half moon clip concept to allow revolvers to eject rimless cartridges. S&W made the 1917 on the "N" frame and Colt used the New Service for their 1917. After the war ended, S&W continued to make the 1917 Commercial, with silver medallion grips and some frame marking changes. In 1937, Brazil ordered a quantity of 1917 Commercials for military and police. These were quite rare until the 1990's when a large quantity were inported to the USA. When they packed them, they were just thrown or shoveled in crates (Yes, you read that right) and the already worn guns were further degraded. Many with the high gloss commercial finish were completly ruined, so many were bead blasted and matt blued. Yes, the 1917 Military, Commercial, and the 1937 Brizilian contract guns are all .45 ACP cal. and versions of the 1917.

Sorry about the long post, but this needed to be posted. Boy, are my fingers tired.
carebear
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:09 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Post by carebear »

theinterchange wrote:Yeah. I'm currently shopping around for a good 22 for target practice. I was searching GunBroker.com and saw that S&W makes a 22 clone of a 1917. Anyone know something about them?
Are you referring to the Mdl. 22 Smith? That's a modern recreation of the .45 cal.

If you want a Hand Ejector in .22 LR you can get the real vintage deal, it's a medium (K) frame though, not the large "N".

K-22's are sweet shooters and you'll be shooting a piece of history.
theinterchange
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 am

Post by theinterchange »

carebear wrote:
theinterchange wrote:Yeah. I'm currently shopping around for a good 22 for target practice. I was searching GunBroker.com and saw that S&W makes a 22 clone of a 1917. Anyone know something about them?
Are you referring to the Mdl. 22 Smith? That's a modern recreation of the .45 cal.

If you want a Hand Ejector in .22 LR you can get the real vintage deal, it's a medium (K) frame though, not the large "N".

K-22's are sweet shooters and you'll be shooting a piece of history.
Ahh, ok I just did a search on S&W's site and it is indeed a model 22. My bad.

The one you're talking about sounds good. I was looking at a Smith model 617 which is a 10 round .22LR [the 6" barrel not the 4"] What's the model of the hand ejector?
carebear
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:09 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Post by carebear »

"Hand Ejector" is just what Smith called their earliest swing out cylinder revolvers.

As Smith created more and more versions in different calibers they went to a standardized numbering system.

For example, the "6XX" means it's in stainless steel.

If you aren't concerned about it being "Indy" style just search generally under Smith .22 revolvers.

K-22 and .22 Kit Gun are a couple common descriptions that refer to a type, not a particular model number.

Your choices will be defined by:
finish (blue or stainless),
frame size and type (small "J" or medium "K/L", square or round butt), material (steel or alloy or titanium),
barrel length and sights (fixed or adjustable)
and capacity (the older models will just be 6 shooters).

You need to refine exactly what you're looking for, the best way to do that is to go look and figure out what you like.

Then, for other "classic" makers, you can check out the Colt's and H&R's as well.

Fortunately .22s are cheap to buy and shoot, there's always room for one more. :D
theinterchange
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 am

Post by theinterchange »

That's why I'm interested in a .22 cheapness of shooting. I'm not overly familiar with handguns but am learning. I've been around hunting rifles more.

I was thinking you had a particular model in mind when you were describing it. haha

I've been looking at my options and really like the feel of revolvers, though the Sig Mosquito is a nice handling gun.
User avatar
bigrex
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1188
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:21 pm
Location: Alfecca Meridiana

Post by bigrex »

The Smith & Wesson model 22's actually shoot 45 ACP just like the 1917. It has nothing to do with the 22 caliber rifle "plinker" round. It's just the name of the model group that are reproductions of some of their old revolvers. I'm not sure if you were confused over that or not, but you at least had me confused as to what you might or might not know about them.
User avatar
Kaplan
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Mid by Midwest

Post by Kaplan »

1917 commercial model = Hand Ejector 2nd model

As far as I know these terms are analogous.
theinterchange
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 am

Post by theinterchange »

bigrex wrote:The Smith & Wesson model 22's actually shoot 45 ACP just like the 1917. It has nothing to do with the 22 caliber rifle "plinker" round. It's just the name of the model group that are reproductions of some of their old revolvers. I'm not sure if you were confused over that or not, but you at least had me confused as to what you might or might not know about them.
I initially thought it was a .22 caliber.. but carebear and a visit to Smith's site cleared it up. It was a confusing listing on gunbroker.com that give me this impression. I should have did more research.. I thought it sounded too good to be true!
Post Reply