Genuine Last Crusade Jacket Pics

Discuss all of the intricacies of the jacket in full detail

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg

Post Reply
User avatar
Technonut
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
Location: Wild, Wonderful, West "By Gawd" Virginia

Genuine Last Crusade Jacket Pics

Post by Technonut »

I came across these detailed pics of the genuine Last Crusade jacket that was auctioned-off by Profiles In History for $94,400 :shock:

I hope that the Mods will relax the 6 pic limit on these... I think that these detailed leather jacket pics are the essence of what this forum is all about... ;)

I have not seen these posted here... If I have missed them somehow, LMK, and I will edit this post... :)


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
St. Dumas
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Bartertown

Post by St. Dumas »

I know that jacket's been often identified as the Crusade jacket (likely even at the auction), but it's not the hero jacket from the film. You can tell even by only looking at the collar stand and button configuration (not to mention the cheesy distressing job).

SD
GCR
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 637
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 10:59 pm
Location: At the Indylounge

Post by GCR »

I could be wrong, but I recall hearing somewhere before that this jacket was actually a fraud. It certainly looks a bit suspicious to me, anyway.

By the way, I'm not trying to detract from your thread or anything, just figured I'd give you the FYI on this jacket. These are still great pics, and if I am wrong and this jacket IS the real deal, all the better that you posted them here. Thanks for that. :tup:

-GCR
User avatar
Technonut
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
Location: Wild, Wonderful, West "By Gawd" Virginia

Post by Technonut »

GCR wrote:I could be wrong, but I recall hearing somewhere before that this jacket was actually a fraud. It certainly looks a bit suspicious to me, anyway.

By the way, I'm not trying to detract from your thread or anything, just figured I'd give you the FYI on this jacket. These are still great pics, and if I am wrong and this jacket IS the real deal, all the better that you posted them here. Thanks for that. :tup:

-GCR
No, not at all... I would like to know about it.. ;) I would also like to know if the winning bidder got their $94,400 back if the jacket was indeed a fraud.... :-k :shock:

Maybe one of the forum jacket experts will chime-in to give the "genuine" low-down... ;)
User avatar
Technonut
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
Location: Wild, Wonderful, West "By Gawd" Virginia

Post by Technonut »

St. Dumas wrote:I know that jacket's been often identified as the Crusade jacket (likely even at the auction), but it's not the hero jacket from the film. You can tell even by only looking at the collar stand and button configuration (not to mention the cheesy distressing job).

SD
I don't know.... Look at the "cheesy distressing job" around the seams and pocket flaps in these screen grabs: It is possible that some shoe polish or something was used on the distressed areas, and wore off, leaving the raw look in the auction pics....

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Kaplan
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Mid by Midwest

Post by Kaplan »

User avatar
Technonut
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
Location: Wild, Wonderful, West "By Gawd" Virginia

Post by Technonut »

Very good... :) This has been discussed before. Good topic Kaplan... It's funny that I had the same pics of the seams already stored from my scalloped pocket flap post that were discussed in your thread... :)

Anyhow.... there was no mention of the jacket being a fraud in your post. Have you come up with any further info, or is it safe to assume that the auction pics are the genuine article?

EDIT: If no one minds, I think I will leave this post go for a while... It seems that there are a few like me that have not seen these pics before, and it makes for just as good discussion as when Kaplan posted about it last year.
User avatar
Kt Templar
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 4715
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:32 am
Location: London.

Post by Kt Templar »

There is one tell missing on the auction jacket that is evident on the pics from the film that you posted. The jacket's left pocket flap (Ford's right) has a distinct lighter line/area corresponding with the pocket underneath. The auction jacket is unmarked in this area. It may very well be a jacket from LC just not that one. There's been discussion here in the past that this auction jacket may have been worked on after filming to make it appear more distressed.

Afterall most accounts put 10 jackets or more in Raiders, the may be the same or more for LC.
User avatar
St. Dumas
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Bartertown

Post by St. Dumas »

It's not even close to being a Crusade film jacket. The collar stand on the film jacket was taller, and made of leather, not cloth. This is what gives it the look of a much larger collar than in the other films. The seam joining the collar to the stand is actually visible on the top/front of the collar as it folds over: that wouldn't be possible if the inside of the collar stand was made of cloth, like in the photo. What's more, the button snaps on the film jacket are below the collar stand, not on the collar stand like the one in the pics.

It's all in the collar.

SD
User avatar
coronado3
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:45 pm
Location: indiana

Post by coronado3 »

It oculd be that this one is simply a stunt jacket...Perhaps when Indy went into the drink after obtaining the cross of coronado..

Coronado3
User avatar
Captain Ron Solo
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:52 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by Captain Ron Solo »

Since seeing the original thread on this topic, I have always thought that the funky jacket was used mainly for this scene:

Image

The seams look fairly overdone to me.

JKL
Ron
User avatar
St. Dumas
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Bartertown

Post by St. Dumas »

You might very well be right about that, Solo. A scene-specific jacket would still technically be a jacket used in the film, so the description of it at the auction may have been accurate after all, albeit probably misleading.

Good call.

SD
CM
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by CM »

It's a bloody terrible looking jacket alright. Stunt jacket? Maybe. The tank scene does seem a likely candidate. Notice the inside pocket - a Wested type facing. Maybe it was one of Peter's experiments as he tried to remember the original design back in the late 1980's....
User avatar
djd
Museum Curator
Museum Curator
Posts: 1272
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:52 am
Location: Tranquility Base

Post by djd »

Not sure it's a terrible jacket so much as a dumb distressing job! What jacket wears around the seams like that? Sure seams get worn, but not all around to that degree. Silly :?
User avatar
Indiana Kev
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

Post by Indiana Kev »

Here is a question...is that what a bermans and nathan's tag looks like?
User avatar
Technonut
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
Location: Wild, Wonderful, West "By Gawd" Virginia

Post by Technonut »

EDIT: What I posted before about the collar snap in this picture: viewtopic.php?t=21563.. being on the collar stand looks different to me now that I stared at it awhile....

Any opinions on where the snap is located in that pic?
User avatar
Kt Templar
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 4715
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:32 am
Location: London.

Post by Kt Templar »

The female part of the snap is on the storm flap it also has a visible cover on the outside of the storm flap in the shot from the Charlemagne scene.

The Auction jacket does not have the cover on the outside, the female part has become detached from the stormflap and is attached to the male part on the other side of the jacket.
Captain D
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1045
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 1:22 pm
Location: York County, PA

Post by Captain D »

Looks like the arm sleeve seam is 1'' inch lower than the yoke, like in Raiders.
Plus, look at the two shades of brown...the color of the back versus a lighter brown/reddish tone towards the front of the jacket...
User avatar
Indiana Max
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Europe/Germany/munich
Contact:

Post by Indiana Max »

Screen accurate or not, that is one of my favorite jackets all over :wink:
Indiana Neri
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 567
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 3:25 pm
Location: Rhode Island: The Tiny State That's Actually NOT An Island...and no, I'm not from "Quahog"

Post by Indiana Neri »

_ wrote:Anybody notice the inside pocket is on the wrong side?
Yeah, I noticed that too. In fact, I had my Wested beside me when viewing this thread and I had to look at my jacket to be sure, :lol:

:wink:
User avatar
Technonut
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
Location: Wild, Wonderful, West "By Gawd" Virginia

Post by Technonut »

_ wrote:Anybody notice the inside pocket is on the wrong side?
Do you know anything conclusive about the authenticity of this jacket _? I was hoping someone knowledgeable regarding it would stop by... ;)

I could not find any info online about it being a fraud... But then again, if I dropped 94 GRAND on a jacket that turned out to be a fake, I probably would not scream to the media about it. :roll: The auction house, yes.... Media... No...

BTW... If you search under "Indiana Jones Jacket "on the popular site by the bay,... ;) you will find an "original" LC jacket... The guy says he can get 1000,000.00 dollars for it, but he is a reasonable person.... :rolling:
User avatar
Technonut
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
Location: Wild, Wonderful, West "By Gawd" Virginia

Post by Technonut »

Thanks for the info _. :) So, we have a jacket with good provenance... I wonder if any info was included to point where / when it appeared on film?

Even if I HAD 94 grand to throw-around, I would at least like to be able to roll LC in my home theater, and be able to point at the scene(s) saying, "Yep, there it is!".... :lol:

Hmmmm... I wonder if the Tux I wore in "Broadcast News" during the scene where Holly Hunter went down the escalator is worth anything?... :-k
User avatar
St. Dumas
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Bartertown

Post by St. Dumas »

So the purchaser shelled out $94K for a back-up jacket that was never onscreen, has considerable design departures from the Crusade hero jacket and was artificially distressed well after the film left theatres.

Having had access to the paperwork, that purchaser got what he wanted: a jacket he could say was from the Last Crusade costume collection that was donated by Lucasfilm and put on display at the Smithsonian.

SD
User avatar
Michaelson
Knower of Things
Posts: 44484
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando

Post by Michaelson »

Well, yeah. Like YOU pointed out....the inside pocket is on the wrong side. :wink:

Regards! Michaelson
User avatar
St. Dumas
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Bartertown

Post by St. Dumas »

Actually, the only point I was trying to make was that we now know what is the exact price of bragging rights to owning an "official Lucasfilm-issued Last Crusade film jacket". (Likely chump change to the purchaser.)

SD
Post Reply