Wested makes the best jacket & the LC pocket was small
Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Mike, Indydawg
Wested makes the best jacket & the LC pocket was small
Let's talk facts.
Look at Wested LC below
I hear many people saying that the LC jacket has large pockets (I believe we all agree that the jacket in the photo is LC) and that FS make the most screen accurate jacket.
It is also accepted by this forum that the Raiders jacket had small pockets, smaller than the LCs. I remember also reading that TOD had small pockets too.
Now if we say that the Raiders had small pockets (or at least smaller than LC's) and we all agree that TOD had smaller pockets, (I think Peter also agrees on that) and also we all agree that the pockets in the photo above are small, then my friends look at the photo of the new FS below
and tell me where do you see the small pockets and where is the screen accuracy?
Look at Wested LC below
I hear many people saying that the LC jacket has large pockets (I believe we all agree that the jacket in the photo is LC) and that FS make the most screen accurate jacket.
It is also accepted by this forum that the Raiders jacket had small pockets, smaller than the LCs. I remember also reading that TOD had small pockets too.
Now if we say that the Raiders had small pockets (or at least smaller than LC's) and we all agree that TOD had smaller pockets, (I think Peter also agrees on that) and also we all agree that the pockets in the photo above are small, then my friends look at the photo of the new FS below
and tell me where do you see the small pockets and where is the screen accuracy?
Last edited by PLATON on Mon Dec 04, 2006 2:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:39 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
Hard to tell, Platon. We know Ford wore a size 44R in LC. What size is the FS jacket you're showing in the second photo. We need to know if we're comparing apples to apples in sizes here.
We've also heard a LOT of reports like Masterfulks above. Wested pockets have been all OVER the chart, but it's going to depend on the actual jacket sizes. In the past, the pockets were already pre-cut, and many times you'll find the same pocket on a size 40 as you'd find on a 48. Needless to say, the pocket is HUGE on a 40 (appearing like the second photo), and tiny on a 48. Same pocket, different jacket sizes.
So, with this in mind, continue your proof of the 'hypothesis' in your subject title? Not saying you're wrong, but I'm curious how you think these photos prove that hypothesis?
Regards! Michaelson
We've also heard a LOT of reports like Masterfulks above. Wested pockets have been all OVER the chart, but it's going to depend on the actual jacket sizes. In the past, the pockets were already pre-cut, and many times you'll find the same pocket on a size 40 as you'd find on a 48. Needless to say, the pocket is HUGE on a 40 (appearing like the second photo), and tiny on a 48. Same pocket, different jacket sizes.
So, with this in mind, continue your proof of the 'hypothesis' in your subject title? Not saying you're wrong, but I'm curious how you think these photos prove that hypothesis?
Regards! Michaelson
Last edited by Michaelson on Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Indy Magnoli
- Staff Member
- Posts: 6970
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 4:00 am
- Location: Middle Earth, New Zealand
- Contact:
-
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:39 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
Michaelson wrote:Hard to tell, Platon. We know Ford wore a size 44R in LC. What size is the FS jacket you're showing in the second photo. We need to know if we're comparing apples to apples in sizes here.
We've also heard a LOT of reports like Masterfulks above. Wested pockets have been all OVER the chart, but it's going to depend on the actual jacket sizes. In the past, the pockets were already pre-cut, and many times you'll find the same pocket on a size 40 as you'd find on a 48. Needless to say, the pocket is HUGE on a 40 (appearing like the second photo), and tiny on a 48. Same pocket, different jacket sizes.
So, with this in mind, continue your proof of the 'hypothesis' in your subject title? Not saying you're wrong, but I'm curious how you think these photos prove that hypothesis?
Regards! Michaelson
My Jacket is a 44R btw. It's suposed to be the Temple cut, but the distance between the jacket bottom and the pocket bottom is closer to the FS pic above, rather than the LC pic.
Although I'm one of those people that feels that if you have to line up a stream of pictures to tell what's what then it's close enough for me.
Re: Wested makes the best jacket - with proof.
I'm not so sure the Raiders pockets were as small as you make them out to be (or as small as you claim everyone makes them out to be, I guess). I'm also not so sure that the long held belief about the LC pockets being bigger is true. According to the IndyGear jacket page, it was the INTERIOR pocket that was made larger to accomodate the grail diary, not the external pockets. Here are some shots of the RAIDERS jacket. Comparing it to the picture of the FS you posted, the pocket size seems much closer, and FS is, I believe, only reputed to be screen accurate when compared with the RAIDERS jacket.PLATON wrote:Let's talk facts.
Look at Wested LC below
I hear many people saying that the LC jacket has large pockets (I believe we all agree that the jacket in the photo is LC) and that FS make the most screen accurate jacket.
It is also accepted by this forum that the Raiders jacket had small pockets, smaller than the LCs. I remember also reading that TOD had small pockets too.
Now if we say that the Raiders had small pockets (or at least smaller than LC's) and we all agree that TOD had smaller pockets, (I think Peter also agrees on that) and also we all agree that the pockets in the photo above are small, then my friends look at the photo of the new FS below
and tell me where do you see the small pockets and where is the screen accuracy?
Pockets look fairly big here.
Pretty big here, too.
And this one is harder to make out, but it also puts the location of the pockets (in relation to the bottom of the jacket) in perspective.
Also, I agree that the FS jacket in that pic does seem a bit on the large side, an accurate comparison can only really be made between jackets of the same size, and who knows what size EITHER of those jackets is? The Smithsonian jacket could have been Ford's, which would make it 44R. My 44R Wested looks MUCH smaller in overall size when compared to the pic of the FS. Besides, who knows what strange adjustments or alterations might have been made to the jacket pattern by the time LC rolled around. If my memory serves, Peter Botwright didn't even make the jakets for ToD, as they were instead copies of the original Raiders jacket made by a French company. That would leave a good 8 or so years in between when Peter made the jackets for Raiders and when he was then commissioned to produce new jackets for LC. We know they added the press studs on the storm flap, so who knows what other changes might have been made? I'm not trying to say that FS is the best and Wested stinks, so don't get me wrong. I only own one Indy jacket, and it's a Wested. I just don't think your comparison is totally reliable, as you're asking us to compare a Botwright made LC jacket of unknown size with a Raiders style FS, also of unknown size. If you can find a screen-used Raiders jacket, and an FS in the same size, then by all means, let the comparison and reviews begin! But to say that Wested is the Best, without even including a current Wested design in your analysis, that doesn't seem quite right to me.
-GCR
-
- Professor of Archaeology
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 1:22 pm
- Location: York County, PA
Although I may be mistaken, but...
If I remember correctly, the second pic that Platon posted as supposedly a "new Flightsuits jacket" is NOT actually a new Flightsuits jacket afterall.
I think I have seen that pic a long time ago when Lee Keppler first began his Flightsuits Indy jacket project. This Flightsuits jacket pic, that Platon has listed for us, is actually a pic of one of the first Flightsuits jackets ever produced by Lee Keppler and is indeed one of the prototypes. Since then, better front pockets were altered in order to be more Raiders screen-accurate and have already been changed on today's Flightsuits Indy jackets.
Unless I'm wrong (someone please correct me if I am), that is a prototype Flightsuits jacket since back when, and is not the latest Flightsuits offering as far as the pockets are concerned....
Kindest Regards,
Captain D
If I remember correctly, the second pic that Platon posted as supposedly a "new Flightsuits jacket" is NOT actually a new Flightsuits jacket afterall.
I think I have seen that pic a long time ago when Lee Keppler first began his Flightsuits Indy jacket project. This Flightsuits jacket pic, that Platon has listed for us, is actually a pic of one of the first Flightsuits jackets ever produced by Lee Keppler and is indeed one of the prototypes. Since then, better front pockets were altered in order to be more Raiders screen-accurate and have already been changed on today's Flightsuits Indy jackets.
Unless I'm wrong (someone please correct me if I am), that is a prototype Flightsuits jacket since back when, and is not the latest Flightsuits offering as far as the pockets are concerned....
Kindest Regards,
Captain D
- Texas Raider
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 1820
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:47 am
- Location: Back in Texas, AGAIN! (but still under my hat)
Here are pics of the two jacket pockets. Wested on the left, Flighsuits(Gibson and Barnes) on the right. Wested is much larger, as you can see. I have two Flightsuits, both have the same size pockets(screen accurate Raiders)
[img][img]http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/1720/1001478nv5.th.jpg[/img][/img] And the full pic- [img][url=http ... .jpg[/img][/img][/url]
[img][img]http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5797/1001483sg1.th.jpg[/img][/img]
TR
[img][img]http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/1720/1001478nv5.th.jpg[/img][/img] And the full pic- [img][url=http ... .jpg[/img][/img][/url]
[img][img]http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5797/1001483sg1.th.jpg[/img][/img]
TR
viewtopic.php?t=18208
According to this, you are mistaken about Ford's size being a 44.
He is ...
Noel J. Howard : NHowardUk@aol.com
Harrison Ford's sizes :
5' 9 1/2" (1.765 m) height, 40 chest and 34 waist with a 15 1/2" collar.
Shirt : Medium
Trousers : 34"
Web belt : 44"
Gunbelt : 38"
Bag Strap : 65"
Boots : 10.5
and that makes him a size 40R.
And now if you compare this photo
with this...
you will see that again Wested is a winner.
In that photo the FS pocket looks more than a A-2 pocket. The Indy jacket has distinctively larger pockets than the A-2.
According to this, you are mistaken about Ford's size being a 44.
He is ...
Noel J. Howard : NHowardUk@aol.com
Harrison Ford's sizes :
5' 9 1/2" (1.765 m) height, 40 chest and 34 waist with a 15 1/2" collar.
Shirt : Medium
Trousers : 34"
Web belt : 44"
Gunbelt : 38"
Bag Strap : 65"
Boots : 10.5
and that makes him a size 40R.
And now if you compare this photo
with this...
you will see that again Wested is a winner.
In that photo the FS pocket looks more than a A-2 pocket. The Indy jacket has distinctively larger pockets than the A-2.
- Texas Raider
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 1820
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:47 am
- Location: Back in Texas, AGAIN! (but still under my hat)
- Texas Raider
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 1820
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:47 am
- Location: Back in Texas, AGAIN! (but still under my hat)
- mark seven
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:50 pm
- Location: Bath,UK
-
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: East of Swindiana
Not to mention Ford's head is almost the same size as the Idol, and the Idol is supposed to be roughly the same height as the pocket... that is a weird pic, perspective-wise.Texas Raider wrote:That picture has always been up for debate. It's taken with a 'fish eye' lens or something and is distorted in dimensions. Look at the bottom of the pocket seem, it's almost righ at the jacket bottom, something is wrong with that..
Which of the below jackets have the largest pockets?
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
According to Noel Howard in an email to me, Ford was a 40R for Raiders, and a 44R for LC, as the movies were made 9 years apart, and he had put on a little more middle aged spread by the 3rd movie. The jacket in the first photo is an LC jacket. If we take Noel at his word, and the jacket shown IS an LC jacket worn by Ford, then it's a 44R.
Peter Botwright himself has stated on many occasions here that the outside pockets on the LC jackets were intentionally made big to allow for the journal to be slid in if required, so Peter is the source for the 'large pocket' on the LC jacket information. So, you're saying Peter Botwright of Wested Leather is wrong, and yet he still makes the best jacket out there. I'm confused now.
So, once again, what does all this have to do with your subject title regarding who makes the best jacket?
Regards! Michaelson
Peter Botwright himself has stated on many occasions here that the outside pockets on the LC jackets were intentionally made big to allow for the journal to be slid in if required, so Peter is the source for the 'large pocket' on the LC jacket information. So, you're saying Peter Botwright of Wested Leather is wrong, and yet he still makes the best jacket out there. I'm confused now.
So, once again, what does all this have to do with your subject title regarding who makes the best jacket?
Regards! Michaelson
This is the reason I had to ask for smaller pockets on my next Wested after this one. I had asked Peter to take one inch off the bottom of the standard length for a Raiders jacket in my size and with the standard pocket size being what it was, this is how it turned out. Rediculous in terms of screen accuracy. I think it looks cool, but I was going after what was in the film and as you can see, something is way off. Keep in mind the bottom of the jacket is still several inches below my pant line.
I honestly think alot of this has to do with camera angles and as with ribbon on hats, even a half an inch off will give you a different perception of the entire outcome. It begins to create illusions.
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
-
- Professor of Archaeology
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 1:22 pm
- Location: York County, PA
I agree w/ Michaelson, I'm also a lil' confused about Platon's point he's trying to make. Especially, when Platon mentions how the prototype FS was more screen-accurate than today's modified FS pockets...
I'm assuming that he is suggesting that the FS prototype, with the larger pockets, appear to be more screen-accurate based on these photos from Raiders....
In the pic of Indy holding the idol, look how large his right hand is. It's huge! I bet he could wrap his entire hand around my head, lol.
Kind regards,
Captain D
I'm assuming that he is suggesting that the FS prototype, with the larger pockets, appear to be more screen-accurate based on these photos from Raiders....
In the pic of Indy holding the idol, look how large his right hand is. It's huge! I bet he could wrap his entire hand around my head, lol.
Kind regards,
Captain D
Last edited by Captain D on Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
I have another photo of this Smithsonian jacket, sent to me by a member here last year, that's a head on shot. What you don't see in the photo above are the snaps that are installed on the storm flap of the jacket. Were these installed on the TofD jacket as well?
I've sent the photo to Mike to post here for me when he gets a chance so you can see what I'm talking about.
Regards! Michaelson
I've sent the photo to Mike to post here for me when he gets a chance so you can see what I'm talking about.
Regards! Michaelson
- randystokes
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:22 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
I'm lost, too. But let me say this: A year or so ago, I ordered a Raiders jacket from Wested, with no real modifications. I think it's a 46R. In any event, the pockets on my jacket are definitely big enough to hold a Grail Diary -- I've tried it with the Grail Diary I got from Magnoli. I don't know if that means Wested is (now?) making pockets on all its models large enough to hold the Grail Diary, or if they are (now?) scaling the sizes of the pockets to match the size of the jacket (so my diary fits my pockets because of my, uh, girth).
Randy
Randy
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- randystokes
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:22 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- randystokes
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:22 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
-
- Laboratory Technician
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:46 pm
-
- Laboratory Technician
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:46 pm
-
- Museum Curator
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: East of Swindiana
Thank you, milesfides! Here's the thread on the jacket, edited per your request...milesfides wrote:That is an outstanding jacket. Pockets are sized perfectly. Distressing is pitch perfect. Give us the specs on that!
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
Agreed. I can honestly say I've never USED the side entry pockets on ANY of the Indy jackets I've owned over the years. They're 'screen accurate', but totally useless in my case, as I have large hands, and they just don't fit, so they're a lint catcher._ wrote: Personally? I would not mind seeing them drop the handwarmer and just sticking with the patch-pocket. Simple and more period-accurate. Also eliminates an infamous stress point - I've had a few Wested's fail there and have had to have the pockets restitched...
Regards! Michaelson
-
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:39 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
- Michaelson
- Knower of Things
- Posts: 44484
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Out here knowing stuff and things and wishing I were with the family at Universal Studios Orlando
- Texas Raider
- Expeditionary Hero
- Posts: 1820
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:47 am
- Location: Back in Texas, AGAIN! (but still under my hat)
-
- Laboratory Technician
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:46 pm
Honestly, of all the jackets posted here, and all the threads about distressing, few have looked as screen accurate as yours.Scandinavia Jones wrote:Thank you, milesfides! Here's the thread on the jacket, edited per your request...milesfides wrote:That is an outstanding jacket. Pockets are sized perfectly. Distressing is pitch perfect. Give us the specs on that!
You have inspired me to go for the authentic lamb temple, but in size 38 I hope the pockets and collar are proportional to the jacket as those on yours.
- randystokes
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:22 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona