Guilt of altering original MK-VII
Moderators: Mike, Cajunkraut, Tennessee Smith
- IllinoisJones
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Guilt of altering original MK-VII
I have ordered a strap for my bag, and now have to face removing the old strap from the bag. I am having issues because the bag has survived since 1942 without alteration. Any ideas on how to remove the strap without destroying it? Illinois.
I like the original straps better then the leather ones. The original straps are much more comfortable.
Swindiana helped me overcome my own 'strap dilemma' by kindly giving me a great original strap, except its on quick-release clips so I can take it on and off and use the leather strap when I feel like it.
To remove the original strap , you can try and carefully pick out the stitching rather than atacking it with scissors, that way it can always be sewn back on later if you desire.
Or...just keep the original strap.
Al
Swindiana helped me overcome my own 'strap dilemma' by kindly giving me a great original strap, except its on quick-release clips so I can take it on and off and use the leather strap when I feel like it.
To remove the original strap , you can try and carefully pick out the stitching rather than atacking it with scissors, that way it can always be sewn back on later if you desire.
Or...just keep the original strap.
Al
- IllinoisJones
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
- Indiana Williams
- Professor of Archaeology
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 3:29 am
- Location: 34°5' -117°34'
- Kt Templar
- Legendary Adventurer
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:32 am
- Location: London.
Think about it this way if it helps. Most of these bags have been stashed away for over 50 years not seeing the light of day. You have got it and are using it and valuing it in a totally unexpected way.
Removing the strap is the next step in it's aging, keep it by all means but your new leather strap is now part of it's history too.
Removing the strap is the next step in it's aging, keep it by all means but your new leather strap is now part of it's history too.
- GrailHunter
- Laboratory Technician
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:39 pm
Go to a fabric/hobby store, get a stitch remover. It's a little tool witha sharpened, curved pick on the end. You can take out the stitches without damaging the strap. I did this. My wife uses the old strap as a belt (looks great on her!)
I wouldn't worry about "destroying" this item. If you really want to be part of preserving history, buy two, and leave the second one unaltered. So much militaria was coopted, altered, or just destroyed after WWII. You're part of a long tradition of using military gear for civilian purposes.
=jp=
I wouldn't worry about "destroying" this item. If you really want to be part of preserving history, buy two, and leave the second one unaltered. So much militaria was coopted, altered, or just destroyed after WWII. You're part of a long tradition of using military gear for civilian purposes.
=jp=
- Harrison_Davies
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:55 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne - England
- Contact:
- IllinoisJones
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
- Harrison_Davies
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:55 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne - England
- Contact:
- IllinoisJones
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
- Harrison_Davies
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:55 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne - England
- Contact:
-
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:14 am
- Location: Why don't ya come on down here and I'll show ya!
- Contact:
Harrison,
The bag was originally a civilian issue respirator bag with a gas mask and filter. They weren't designed to be worn diagonally like Indy's. You're supposed to sling it around your neck and let it hang down on your chest. While weraing the gasmask the bag supported the filter. To keep it from flopping around the "quick fix" idea of the lanyard and disc was added. You wrap the lanyard around your back and wrap it around that disc. It functions exactly like the closure on a file folder. It was basically a cheap, "afterthought" method of adding a second strap for the waist.
As far as removing the strap, it's easier than people think. You need to get rid of the rings, too. The Raiders bag had thicker, heavier rings. In some scenes they're bright silver. The welds on the stock rings are hastily done and can be easily cut with a dremel tool with minimal damage. You can carefully bend them and slip them out and you won't have to destroy anything. You can find the heavier, accurate replacement rings at most hardware stores. Un fortunately, putting the new ones in is far harder than removing the old ones. But it just takes a bit of patience
The bag was originally a civilian issue respirator bag with a gas mask and filter. They weren't designed to be worn diagonally like Indy's. You're supposed to sling it around your neck and let it hang down on your chest. While weraing the gasmask the bag supported the filter. To keep it from flopping around the "quick fix" idea of the lanyard and disc was added. You wrap the lanyard around your back and wrap it around that disc. It functions exactly like the closure on a file folder. It was basically a cheap, "afterthought" method of adding a second strap for the waist.
As far as removing the strap, it's easier than people think. You need to get rid of the rings, too. The Raiders bag had thicker, heavier rings. In some scenes they're bright silver. The welds on the stock rings are hastily done and can be easily cut with a dremel tool with minimal damage. You can carefully bend them and slip them out and you won't have to destroy anything. You can find the heavier, accurate replacement rings at most hardware stores. Un fortunately, putting the new ones in is far harder than removing the old ones. But it just takes a bit of patience
- Bufflehead Jones
- Legendary Adventurer
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 10:11 pm
- Location: Maryland
I think it was a British military bag, not civilian. I have seen an awful lot of pictures of British soldiers wearing them on their chest while in combat. Can't really remember any pictures of a civilian wearing one, until Indy came along.
Maybe it was the civilian model that didn't have grooves on the strap. I'm sorry, that comment belongs in another thread, but I just couldn't help myself. Bad Bufflehead, bad Bufflehead.
Maybe it was the civilian model that didn't have grooves on the strap. I'm sorry, that comment belongs in another thread, but I just couldn't help myself. Bad Bufflehead, bad Bufflehead.
- Harrison_Davies
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:55 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne - England
- Contact:
I think you are right buffle...
If i remember correctly the civilian version from what i remember of my history where made from cardboard.
http://www.enfield.gov.uk/museum/educat ... s_wwii.htm
Thanks for the great explanation really helped to visualise it.
If i remember correctly the civilian version from what i remember of my history where made from cardboard.
http://www.enfield.gov.uk/museum/educat ... s_wwii.htm
Thanks for the great explanation really helped to visualise it.
- IllinoisJones
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
- IllinoisJones
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
- Don't Call Me Junior
- Archaeology Student
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:52 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
I haven't gone back and looked at pictures yet, but is your bag a W&G like was used in the movies? The reason I ask is because I own a W&G and it has what I would consider to be rathar thick and heavy rings. I also own a Woods (Canadian MkVII version) and it has kinda small D-shaped rings that appear to be brass. So maybe an original W&G has the right rings?Shawnkara wrote: You need to get rid of the rings, too. The Raiders bag had thicker, heavier rings. In some scenes they're bright silver.
-
- Dig Leader
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:14 am
- Location: Why don't ya come on down here and I'll show ya!
- Contact:
Junior,
That's possible. I got this from the main site, it's an actual W&G. The rings are the same as mine were. However, my bag is NOT a W&G. Some of them may have had thicker rings.
http://indygear.com/gear/images/Seamus.jpg
That's possible. I got this from the main site, it's an actual W&G. The rings are the same as mine were. However, my bag is NOT a W&G. Some of them may have had thicker rings.
http://indygear.com/gear/images/Seamus.jpg
- IllinoisJones
- Archaeologist
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:05 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Contact: