Raiders hats

In-depth discussion of the Fedora of Indiana Jones and all other hats appearing in the Indiana Jones movies

Moderators: Indiana Jeff, Dalexs

Post Reply
User avatar
Fedoraman
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Hanging off the edge of a cliff...

Raiders hats

Post by Fedoraman »

Something that has always bugged me about the fedora used in Raiders of the lost ark: THEY USED SEVERAL DIFFERENT HATS

Just take a look at these and tell me that they are the same lid:

Image

The bashes are very similar - surely done by the same costumer and are all probably HJ's, but the hats themselves vary from scene to scene just as the hats used in TOD.
Feraud
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 9:31 am

Post by Feraud »

That is probably true. Could it also be the lighting?
As was well discussed here, lighting can do amazing things to hat color! :wink:
User avatar
Dakota Ellison
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 4:59 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Dakota Ellison »

Pic 1 is a newer hat used in the last scenes filmed in Hawaii. The other two are the same hat, IMHO. The Chachapoyan temple and The Raven Bar were filmed at Elstree Studios, London.
Feraud
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 9:31 am

Post by Feraud »

Hawaii was filmed last? I thought Alfred Molina(Satipo, Sapito, estupido, etc. :wink: ) talked in an interview about Hawaii as the 'first days of shooting'?
Was he referring to his first days of filming or the first for the project?
Mola Ram
Vendor
Posts: 1306
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 11:08 am
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Post by Mola Ram »

they were the first shot.
User avatar
ShanghaiJack
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 833
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:39 am
Location: Bourbon Country

Post by ShanghaiJack »

Besides the lighting which Feraud mentioned, all of these frames were taken from different angles. The second and third clips are a little closer to being taken from the same angle, but the difference is still there. As Pagey mentioned in another thread, the hat changes its shape remarkably when viewed from a different angle. That being said, I would not be surprised if they used a large number of hats in the filming of Raiders. It just wouldn't make sense to use one hat, and hope that it wasn't damaged beyond repair during filming.
User avatar
indy81
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:57 pm
Location: Mountain View, MO
Contact:

Post by indy81 »

I believe they used numerous hats that were predistressed at various levels to show how beat up it became throughout the adventures. That makes since if they used a new hat in the filming of the Hawaii locations. It was first in the movie, but last in filming so they couldn't have used a beaten up hat. '81
agent5
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3911
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:02 pm

Post by agent5 »

I thought LaRochelle was the first shooting location?

In any case, I always thought that the outdoor Temple scene hat was a completely different hat than all the rest. Maybe even by a different hatter than HJ. There were other hatters who've claimed to have made hats for Rauders, so you never know.
User avatar
Dakota Ellison
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 4:59 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Dakota Ellison »

Molina was refering to to his first day on the set at Elstree, not Hawaii. You are right, Agent 5, La Rochelle was the first.
Last edited by Dakota Ellison on Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Feraud
Professor of Archaeology
Professor of Archaeology
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 9:31 am

Post by Feraud »

Dakota Ellison wrote:Molina was refering to to his first day on the set at Elstree, not Hawaii.
Got it, thanks!
User avatar
Fedoraman
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Hanging off the edge of a cliff...

Post by Fedoraman »

I am not talking about lighting or coloring. I am talking about brim length, crown height and ribon position. The first pic is obviously a VERY tall crown (at least 6" unbashed) while the second and third pics look to be about 5 1/2 or so.
User avatar
Dakota Ellison
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 4:59 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Dakota Ellison »

The hat in pic 1 had a shallower center dent than the other hat in pics 2 and 3.
User avatar
Fedoraman
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Hanging off the edge of a cliff...

Post by Fedoraman »

Dakota Ellison wrote:The hat in pic 1 had a shallower center dent than the other hat in pics 2 and 3.
What about the ribbon position? :twisted:
User avatar
indy81
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:57 pm
Location: Mountain View, MO
Contact:

Post by indy81 »

Could the first hat pictured have been Ford's Christie's hat. I remember hearing that he was rumored to have used it in a few scenes.
User avatar
Fedoraman
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Hanging off the edge of a cliff...

Post by Fedoraman »

indy81 wrote:Could the first hat pictured have been Ford's Christie's hat. I remember hearing that he was rumored to have used it in a few scenes.
What is the "Christie's" hat? You mean the one that was auctioned?
User avatar
indy81
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:57 pm
Location: Mountain View, MO
Contact:

Post by indy81 »

That could've been it.
User avatar
Dakota Ellison
Dig Leader
Dig Leader
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 4:59 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Dakota Ellison »

Then again they could've all been HJs.
User avatar
IndyK
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 4:59 am
Location: In DK (get it?)
Contact:

Post by IndyK »

IMO all 3 photos could easily be the same hat. Light has been mentioned as one way to explain the color differences, but the choice of lens certainly has an effect too. Not on the color but on the perspective and thats where it sometimes becomes impossible to shape a hat from a picture. You cannot make a real-life 3-dimensional hat look like a 2-D screenshot that may have been shot with a wideanglelens. Not whithout a bulldozer that is :D

When talking about crownheight etc. try looking at the picture in generel also. Spielberg uses a wide variety of lenses to get the effects he wants, just remember how he explained the use of a telephotolens in the LC scene where the motorboat is being chopped up (I know, Indy is not wearing a fedora in that scene...) to make it look like they were fighting closer to the screw than they actually were. Photographers can use special lenses to make small buildings look taller (taper?) and visa versa.

Looking at the 3 photos I would even say, that Harrisons face looks rounder on the right photo than on the left (look at his cheeks), and the picture in the middle has always bothered me because it doesn't look like Harrison at all!

Cheers
agent5
Legendary Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
Posts: 3911
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:02 pm

Post by agent5 »

The hat in pic 1 had a shallower center dent than the other hat in pics 2 and 3.
Correct. This is what leads me to believe it may have been made by another hatter or at the very least, the same hat on a totally different block. If the hat was open crowned, there should be a taper to the hat until you push in the front/sides to make the center dent. That's what makes the taper go away. However, on this hat, iut has a much shallower center dent and the sides are not pushed back nearly as far as on the other hats in the film. If the dent is smaller then the hat should have slight taper, but it seems it has less taper than the rest.

Comments? Thoughts? Suggestions? :?:
Post Reply